Taxonomy and Folksonomy Musings =============================== January 16, 2008 Thomas Vander Wal, group hour WordMap - Norway WordMap.com - open source framework Paul Miller UK - interviewed the guy behind WordMap (see YouTube) Tallis - nodalities experts view of terms - how to fit that into a system terms changing over time news vines - for newbies connectbeam - optimized social search http://www.systemone.at/en/ systemone - austria http://www.systemone.at/en/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- January 16, 2008 Thomas Vander Wal STIET Seminar Purposes of Tags * Simple metadata * Sorting * Aggregating information * Identifier * Personal markers Folksonomy - result of personal free tagging of pages/objects for one's own retrieval Tagging usually occurs in a social environment that is shared and open. Act of tagging usually done by consumers of information, not publishers Taggers use their own vocabulary, not a predefined one, which every person is an expert in People do not necessarily use tags to categorize--they are providing a means to connect to their understanding. Carefully thinking out tags does not improve retrievability Every tag is sacred. According to Jennifer Trant of steve.museum, 70% of folksonomy tags were not in the taxonomy (a conservative estimate) Value of tagging for businesses * Intranet * B2B * Customers * External services Improved understanding of customer All current terminology market ementation Target message to language, not taste Intranet >-Refindability improvement >-Context understanding >-Easy sharing by perspective >-Cost-effective way of building a taxonomy >-Term use across silos >-Eases networking and collaboration Analysis and Monitoring * Monitor >-Use >-Inbound/outbound >-Spam >-External tagging systems * Analysis >-System usage patterns >-Term use - synonyms, identifying those near in though, order/structure Understanding Scaling Cold-Start problem 1) Personal use 2) Serendipity 3) Mature social tagging 4) Complex social system NEW | Saving and tagging | Refinding | Clicking and pivoting | Searching \/ Group interaction MATURE 7% of people tag daily (10% according to Forrester) Why Tag * Personal Use >-Perspective/Context (missing metadata, emergent vocabulary, personal descriptors) * Refindability >-Aggregate info based on similarity of content >-Aggregate based on task * Indicate interest Tools Social Bookmarking - del.icio.us, clipmarks, Ma.gnolia Media - flickr, dabble, LastFM, Viddler Shopping - Amazon, Buzzillion Geo - Platial, Socialite Museums - Steve.museum, Powerhouse Intranet - connectBeam, cognenz, dogear, IBM Dating - Consummating Raw Sugar - disambiguation