View Item 

Show simple item record

The extraction of community structures from publication networks to support ethnographic observations of field differences in scientific communication

dc.contributor.authorVelden, Theresaen_US
dc.contributor.authorLagoze, Carlen_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-12-04T18:57:56Z
dc.date.available2015-01-05T13:54:43Zen_US
dc.date.issued2013-12en_US
dc.identifier.citationVelden, Theresa; Lagoze, Carl (2013). "The extraction of community structures from publication networks to support ethnographic observations of field differences in scientific communication." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (12): 2405-2427.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1532-2882en_US
dc.identifier.issn1532-2890en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/101853
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.publisherACM Pressen_US
dc.subject.otherNetwork Analysisen_US
dc.subject.otherQualitative Researchen_US
dc.subject.otherScholarly Communicationen_US
dc.titleThe extraction of community structures from publication networks to support ethnographic observations of field differences in scientific communicationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInformation and Library Scienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/101853/1/asi22929.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/asi.22929en_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technologyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRafols, I., & Meyer, M. ( 2006 ). Knowledge‐sourcing strategies for cross‐disciplinarity in bionanotechnology. SPRU Electronic Working Paper Series.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRafols, I., Porter, A.L., & Leydesdorff, L. ( 2010 ). Science overlay maps: A new tool for research policy and library management. Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 61 ( 9 ), 1871 – 1887.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRosvall, M., & Bergstrom, C. ( 2008 ). Maps of information flow reveal community structure in complex networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 1118.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSeglen, P., & Aksnes, D. ( 2000 ). Scientific productivity and group size: A bibliometric analysis of norwegian microbiological research. Scientometrics, 49 ( 1 ), 125 – 143.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShibata, N., Kajikawa, Y., Takeda, Y., & Matsushima, K. ( 2009 ). Comparative study on methods of detecting research fronts using different types of citation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60 ( 3 ), 571 – 580.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmall, H. ( 1973 ). Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for information Science, 24 ( 4 ), 265 – 269.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStrotmann, A., & Zhao, D. ( 2010 ). Combining commercial citation indexes and open‐access bibliographic databases to delimit highly interdisciplinary research fields for citation analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 4 ( 2 ), 194 – 200.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVan den Besselaar, P. ( 2000 ). Communication between science and technology studies journals: A case study in differentiation and integration in scientific fields. Scientometrics, 47 ( 2 ), 169 – 193.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVan House, N. ( 2002 ). Digital libraries and practices of trust: Networked biodiversity information. Social Epistemology, 16 ( 1 ), 99 – 114.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVelden, T. ( 2013, February). Explaining field differences in openness and sharing in scientific communities. CSCW 2013: Computer Supported Cooperative Work, San Antonio, TX.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVelden, T. ( 2011a ). A methodology for studying field differences in scientific communication—Explaining openness and sharing in two scientific communities in the chemical and physical sciences. PhD thesis, Cornell University.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVelden, T., Haque, A., & Lagoze, C. ( 2011, June). Resolving author name homonymy to improve resolution of structures in co‐author networks. In Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL)'11, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVelden, T., Haque, A., & Lagoze, C. ( 2010 ). A new approach to analyzing patterns of collaboration in co‐authorship networks: Mesoscopic analysis and interpretation. Scientometrics, 85 ( 1 ), 219 – 242.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVeugelers, R. ( 2009 ). Towards a multipolar science world: Trends and impact. Scientometrics, 82 ( 2 ), 439 – 456.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWalsh, J.P., & Bayma, T. ( 1996 ). Computer networks and scientific work. Social Studies of Science, 26 ( 3 ), 661 – 703.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWhitley, R. ( 2000 ). The intellectual and social organization of the sciences. New York: Oxford University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZitt, M. ( 2005 ). Facing diversity of science: A challenge for bibliometric indicators. Measurement, 3 ( 1 ), 38 – 49.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZitt, M., & Bassecoulard, E. ( 2006 ). Delineating complex scientific fields by a hybrid lexical‐citation method: An application to nanosciences. Information Processing & Management, 42 ( 6 ), 1513 – 1531.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZuccala, A. ( 2006 ). Modeling the invisible college. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57 ( 2 ), 152 – 168.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAksnes, D., Olsen, T., & Seglen, P. ( 1999, July). Inadequacy of a journal‐based research field delineation. In Proceedings of Seventh Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics. Colima, Mexico.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBaus, D. ( 2010 ). Cultural exchange in a heterogeneous research field: Approaching scientific culture with anthropological thought. Spontaneous Generations: A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science, 3 ( 1 ), 95 – 104.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBeaulieu, A., Scharnhorst, A., & Wouters, P. ( 2007 ). Not another case study: A middle‐range interrogation of ethnographic case studies in the exploration of e‐science. Science, Technology & Human Values, 32 ( 6 ), 672.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBecher, T., & Trowler, P.R. ( 2001 ). Academic tribes and territories. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education (SRHE) & Open University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBirnholtz, J.P., & Bietz, M.J. ( 2003 ). Data at work: Supporting sharing in science and engineering In “GROUP”03 (pp. 339 – 348 ). New York: ACM Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBörner, K., Sanyal, S., & Vespignani, A. ( 2007 ). Network science. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41 ( 1 ), 537 – 607.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoyack, K.W., & Klavans, R. ( 2010 ). Co‐citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately? JASIST, 61 ( 12 ), 2389 – 2404.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCambrosio, A., Keating, P., & Mogoutov, A. ( 2004 ). Mapping collaborative work and innovation in biomedicine: A computer‐assisted analysis of antibody reagent workshops. Social Studies of Science, 34 ( 3 ), 325 – 364.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCana, M. ( 2010 ). Open access repositories in the cultural configuration of disciplines: Applying actor‐network theory to knowledge production by astronomers and philosophers of science. PhD thesis, Rutgers University‐Graduate School‐New Brunswick.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCrane, D. ( 1972 ). Invisible colleges—Diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities, The University of Chicago Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCronin, B. ( 2003 ). Scholarly communication and epistemic cultures. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 9 ( 1 ), 1 – 24.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFry, J., & Talja, S. ( 2004 ). The cultural shaping of scholarly communication: Explaining e‐journal use within and across academic fields. Proceedings of the American Society of Information Science and Technology, 41, 20 – 30.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFry, J., & Talja, S. ( 2007 ). The intellectual and social organization of academic fields and the shaping of digital resources. Journal of Information Science, 33 ( 2 ), 115.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGalison, P. ( 1997 ). Image and logic: A material culture of microphysics. University Of Chicago Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGeels, F.W. ( 2007 ). Feelings of discontent and the promise of middle range theory for STS: Examples from technology dynamics. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 32 ( 6 ), 627 – 651.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGeiger, R., & Ribes, D. ( 2011 ). Trace ethnography: Following coordination through documentary practices. In System Sciences (HICSS), 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference pp. 1 – 10.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGläser, J. ( 2006 ). Wissenschaftliche Produktionsgemeinschaften—die soziale Ordnung der Forschung, Vol. 906. Frankfurt/New York: Campus Verlag.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGläser, J., & Laudel, G. ( 2007 ). The social construction of bibliometric evaluations In R. Whitley & J. Glдser (Eds.), The changing governance of the sciences (pp. 101 – 123 ). The Netherlands: Springer.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGläser, J., & Laudel, G. ( 2001 ). Integrating scientometric indicators into sociological studies: methodical and methodological problems. Scientometrics, 52 ( 3 ), 411 – 434.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGuimera, R., Sales‐Pardo, M., & Amaral, L. ( 2007 ). Classes of complex networks defined by role‐to‐role connectivity profiles. Nature Physics, 3 ( 1 ), 63 – 69.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGuimera, R., Uzzi, B., Spiro, J., & Amaral, L. ( 2005 ). Team assembly mechanisms determine collaboration network structure and team performance. Science, 308 ( 5722 ), 697 – 702.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHellsten, I., Lambiotte, R., Scharnhorst, A., & Ausloos, M. ( 2007 ). Self‐citations, co‐authorships and keywords: A new approach to scientists' field mobility? Scientometrics, 72, 469 – 486.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHine, C. ( 2008 ). Systematics as cyberscience: Computers, change, and continuity in science, Cambridge: MIT Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHoward, P. ( 2002 ). Network ethnography and the hypermedia organization: New media, new organizations, new methods. New Media & Society, 4 ( 4 ), 550 – 574.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHuang, C., Notten, A., & Rasters, N. ( 2011 ). Nanoscience and technology publications and patents: A review of social science studies and search strategies. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 36 ( 2 ), 145 – 172.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJamali, H., & Nicholas, D. ( 2008 ). Information‐seeking behaviour of physicists and astronomers. In “Aslib Proceedings,” pp. 444 – 462.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJansen, D., von Gцrtz, R., & Heidler, R. ( 2010 ). Knowledge production and the structure of collaboration networks in two scientific fields. Scientometrics, 83 ( 1 ), 219 – 241.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKling, R., & McKim, G. ( 2000 ). Not just a matter of time: Field differences and the shaping of electronic media in supporting scientific communication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51 ( 14 ), 1306 – 1320.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKling, R., McKim, G., & King, A. ( 2003 ). A bit more of it: Scholarly communication forums as socio‐technical interaction networks. Journal of the American Society of Information Science and Technology, 54, 47 – 67.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKling, R., Spector, L.B., & Fortuna, J. ( 2004 ). The real stakes of virtual publishing: The transformation of E‐Biomed into PubMed central. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55 ( 2 ), 127 – 148.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKnorr Cetina, K. ( 1999 ). Epistemic cultures—How the sciences make knowledge. Harvard University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKretschmer, H. ( 1994 ). Coauthorship networks of invisible colleges and institutionalized communities. Scientometrics, 30 ( 1 ), 363 – 369.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLambiotte, R., & Panzarasa, P. ( 2009 ). Communities, knowledge creation, and information diffusion. Journal of Informetrics, 3 ( 3 ), 180 – 190.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLancichinetti, A., & Fortunato, S. ( 2009 ). Community detection algorithms: a comparative analysis. Physical Review E, 80 ( 5 ), 056117.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLaurens, P., Zitt, M., & Bassecoulard, E. ( 2010 ). Delineation of the genomics field by hybrid citation‐lexical methods: interaction with experts and validation process. Scientometrics, 82 ( 3 ), 647 – 662.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLievrouw, L.A. ( 1990 ). Reconceiling structure and process in the study of scholarly communication. In Borgman C.L. (Ed.), Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLievrouw, L., Rogers, E., Lowe, C., & Nadel, E. ( 1987 ). Triangulation as a research strategy for identifying invisible colleges among biomedical scientists. Social Networks, 9 ( 3 ), 217 – 248.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMelin, G., & Persson, O. ( 1996 ). Studying research collaboration using co‐authorships. Scientometrics, 36 ( 3 ), 363 – 377.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoed, H. ( 2005 ). Citation analysis in research evaluation. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMogoutov, A., & Kahane, B. ( 2007 ). Data search strategy for science and technology emergence: A scalable and evolutionary query for nanotechnology tracking. Research Policy, 36 ( 6 ), 893 – 903.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoran‐Ellis, J. ( 2006 ). Triangulation and integration: Processes, claims and implications. Qualitative Research, 6 ( 1 ), 45 – 59.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMorris, S., & Van der Veer Martens, B. ( 2008 ). Mapping research specialties. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 42 ( 1 ), 213 – 295.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMulkay, M. ( 1977 ). Sociology of the scientific research community. In I. Spiegel‐Rцsing & D. de Solla Price (Eds.), Science, technology, and society: A cross‐disciplinary perspective (pp. 93 – 148 ). Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications Inc.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNentwich, M. ( 2005 ). Cyberscience: Modelling ICT‐induced changes of the scholarly communication system. Information, Communication & Society, 8 ( 4 ), 542 – 560.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
asi22929.pdf
Size:
1.752MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.