Show simple item record

Manually Classifying User Search Queries on an Academic Library Web Site

dc.contributor.authorChapman, Suzanne
dc.contributor.authorDesai, Shevon
dc.contributor.authorHagedorn, Kat
dc.contributor.authorVarnum, Kenneth J.
dc.contributor.authorMishra, Sonali
dc.contributor.authorPiacentine, Julie
dc.date.accessioned2013-12-05T13:39:47Z
dc.date.available2013-12-05T13:39:47Z
dc.date.issued2013-12-04
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Web Librarianship, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 401-421 <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/101884>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1932-2909
dc.identifier.issn1932-2917
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/101884
dc.description.abstractThe University of Michigan Library wanted to learn more about the kinds of searches its users were conducting through the “one search” search box on the Library Web site. Library staff conducted two investigations. A preliminary investigation in 2011 involved the manual review of the 100 most frequently occurring queries con- ducted through the site search box over the course of a month. Those 100 search terms accounted for 16 percent of total queries and were largely one-word searches for databases. In the follow-up investigation, the Library embarked on a more ambitious exploration of the 454,443 searches conducted during the winter 2011 semester, devising a method for selecting, categorizing, and summarizing user search queries. A sample of 1,201 searches from the search query logs was examined; after eliminating duplicate searches, there were 992 unique terms available for categorization. Using a non-overlapping sample of queries, a rubric was developed for categorizing user searches. Each of seven library staff members reviewed all unique terms in the sample to categorize them into the best fitting category from the rubric. After establishing a threshold for reliability among the individuals categorizing the queries, 862 unique search terms were analyzed. Based on this analysis, the most frequent kinds of searches conducted in the winter semester in 2011 on the University of Michigan Library’s Web site were specific databases (28 percent), topical/exploratory types of queries (28 percent), and books (including searches by title, ISBN, call number, or a combination thereof) (16 percent).Within the sample, known-item searches comprised nearly half (44 percent) of searches in the sample. An- other fifth (20 percent) of total searches were categorized as “exploratory,” supporting the need to provide broader, subject-based paths to information through the site. Somewhat surprisingly, there were a small number of article searches (article titles, or mixed searches of journal names and authors and/or title words) in the search box—an indication that users understand the University of Michigan Library primary search box is not for articles.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectSearch Query Analysis, Manual Query Classification, User Intent, One Search, Ambiguous Query, Federated Search, Broadcast Search, Methods, Information Retrieval, Library Web Sitesen_US
dc.titleManually Classifying User Search Queries on an Academic Library Web Siteen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInformation and Library Science
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity Libraryen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUniversity of Chicagoen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/101884/1/search query analysis manuscript.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/19322909.2013.842096
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Web Librarianshipen_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-0598-0795en_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-2730-5341en_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-2310-5852en_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-0091-1037en_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-1923-650Xen_US
dc.identifier.name-orcidDesai, Shevon; 0000-0003-2730-5341en_US
dc.identifier.name-orcidMishra, Sonali; 0000-0003-1923-650Xen_US
dc.identifier.name-orcidHagedorn, Kat; 0000-0003-2310-5852en_US
dc.identifier.name-orcidChapman, Suzanne; 0000-0002-0598-0795en_US
dc.identifier.name-orcidVarnum, Ken; 0000-0002-0091-1037en_US
dc.owningcollnameLibrary (University of Michigan Library)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.