View Item 

Show simple item record

Urinary diversion after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: options, patient selection, and outcomes

dc.contributor.authorLee, Richard K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAbol‐enein, Hassanen_US
dc.contributor.authorArtibani, Walteren_US
dc.contributor.authorBochner, Bernarden_US
dc.contributor.authorDalbagni, Guidoen_US
dc.contributor.authorDaneshmand, Siamaken_US
dc.contributor.authorFradet, Yvesen_US
dc.contributor.authorHautmann, Richard E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLee, Cheryl T.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLerner, Seth P.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPycha, Arminen_US
dc.contributor.authorSievert, Karl‐dietrichen_US
dc.contributor.authorStenzl, Arnulfen_US
dc.contributor.authorThalmann, Georgen_US
dc.contributor.authorShariat, Shahrokh F.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-08T20:34:44Z
dc.date.available2015-03-02T14:35:34Zen_US
dc.date.issued2014-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationLee, Richard K.; Abol‐enein, Hassan ; Artibani, Walter; Bochner, Bernard; Dalbagni, Guido; Daneshmand, Siamak; Fradet, Yves; Hautmann, Richard E.; Lee, Cheryl T.; Lerner, Seth P.; Pycha, Armin; Sievert, Karl‐dietrich ; Stenzl, Arnulf; Thalmann, Georg; Shariat, Shahrokh F. (2014). "Urinary diversion after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: options, patient selection, and outcomes." BJU International (1): 11-23.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1464-4096en_US
dc.identifier.issn1464-410Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/102130
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.publisherMosby‐Year Booken_US
dc.subject.otherUrinary Bladder Neoplasmsen_US
dc.subject.otherRadical Cystectomyen_US
dc.subject.otherUrinary Diversionen_US
dc.subject.otherPatient Selectionen_US
dc.subject.otherOutcome Assessment (Health Care)en_US
dc.subject.otherBladder Canceren_US
dc.titleUrinary diversion after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: options, patient selection, and outcomesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInternal Medicine and Specialtiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/102130/1/bju12121.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/bju.12121en_US
dc.identifier.sourceBJU Internationalen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEl‐Bahnasawy MS, Shaaban H, Gomha MA, Nabeeh A. Clinical and urodynamic efficacy of oxybutynin and verapamil in the treatment of nocturnal enuresis after formation of orthotopic ileal neobladders. A prospective, randomized, crossover study. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2008; 42: 344 – 351en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSumfest JM, Burns MW, Mitchell ME. The Mitrofanoff principle in urinary reconstruction. J Urol 1993; 150: 1875 – 1877en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBihrle R. The Indiana pouch continent urinary reservoir. Urol Clin North Am 1997; 24: 773 – 779en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSheldon CA, Reeves D, Lewis AG. Oxybutynin administration diminishes the high gastric muscular tone associated with bladder reconstruction. J Urol 1995; 153: 461 – 462en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChristmas TJ, Smith GL, Rickards D. Diagnosis and management of high‐pressure peristaltic contractions in cystoplasties. Br J Urol 1997; 79: 879 – 882en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLee CT, Hafez KS, Sheffield JH, Joshi DP, Montie JE. Orthotopic bladder substitution in women: nontraditional applications. J Urol 2004; 171: 1585 – 1588en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStein JP, Grossfeld GD, Freeman JA et al. Orthotopic lower urinary tract reconstruction in women using the Kock ileal neobladder: updated experience in 34 patients. J Urol 1997; 158: 400 – 405en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencevan Savage JG, Slaughenhoupt BL. Approach to urinary diversion in the surgical patient. J Surg Oncol 2000; 73: 33 – 38en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAghazadeh MA, Barocas DA, Salem S et al. Determining factors for hospital discharge status after radical cystectomy in a large contemporary cohort. J Urol 2010; 185: 85 – 89en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLughezzani G, Sun M, Shariat SF et al. A population‐based competing‐risks analysis of the survival of patients treated with radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Cancer 2011; 117: 103 – 109en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDonat SM, Siegrist T, Cronin A, Savage C, Milowsky MI, Herr HW. Radical cystectomy in octogenarians – does morbidity outweigh the potential survival benefits? J Urol 2010; 183: 2171 – 2177en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKoppie TM, Serio AM, Vickers AJ et al. Age‐adjusted Charlson comorbidity score is associated with treatment decisions and clinical outcomes for patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Cancer 2008; 112: 2384 – 2392en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStein JP, Lieskovsky G, Cote R et al. Radical cystectomy in the treatment of invasive bladder cancer: long‐term results in 1054 patients. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19: 666 – 675en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMadersbacher S, Hochreiter W, Burkhard F et al. Radical cystectomy for bladder cancer today – a homogeneous series without neoadjuvant therapy. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 690 – 696en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHautmann RE, Miller K, Steiner U, Wenderoth U. The ileal neobladder: 6 years of experience with more than 200 patients. J Urol 1993; 150: 40 – 45en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHugonnet CL, Danuser H, Springer JP, Studer UE. Decreased sensitivity in the membranous urethra after orthotopic ileal bladder substitute. J Urol 1999; 161: 418 – 421en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKessler TM, Burkhard FC, Perimenis P et al. Attempted nerve sparing surgery and age have a significant effect on urinary continence and erectile function after radical cystoprostatectomy and ileal orthotopic bladder substitution. J Urol 2004; 172: 1323 – 1327en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSogni F, Brausi M, Frea B et al. Morbidity and quality of life in elderly patients receiving ileal conduit or orthotopic neobladder after radical cystectomy for invasive bladder cancer. Urology 2008; 71: 919 – 923en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceClark PE, Stein JP, Groshen SG et al. Radical cystectomy in the elderly: comparison of clincal outcomes between younger and older patients. Cancer 2005; 104: 36 – 43en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLee CT, Dunn RL, Chen BT, Joshi DP, Sheffield J, Montie JE. Impact of body mass index on radical cystectomy. J Urol 2004; 172: 1281 – 1285en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReyes MA, Nieder AM, Kava BR, Soloway MS, Manoharan M. Does body mass index affect outcome after reconstruction of orthotopic neobladder? Urology 2007; 69: 475 – 478en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePerimenis P, Burkhard FC, Kessler TM, Gramann T, Studer UE. Ileal orthotopic bladder substitute combined with an afferent tubular segment: long‐term upper urinary tract changes and voiding pattern. Eur Urol 2004; 46: 604 – 609en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGburek BM, Lieber MM, Blute ML. Comparison of studer ileal neobladder and ileal conduit urinary diversion with respect to perioperative outcome and late complications. J Urol 1998; 160: 721 – 723en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShimogaki H, Okada H, Fujisawa M et al. Long‐term experience with orthotopic reconstruction of the lower urinary tract in women. J Urol 1999; 161: 573 – 577en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMills RD, Studer UE. Female orthotopic bladder substitution: a good operation in the right circumstances. J Urol 2000; 163: 1501 – 1504en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAli‐el‐Dein B, el‐Sobky E, Hohenfellner M, Ghoneim MA. Orthotopic bladder substitution in women: functional evaluation. J Urol 1999; 161: 1875 – 1880en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStuder UE, Zingg EJ. Ileal orthotopic bladder substitutes. What we have learned from 12 years’ experience with 200 patients. Urol Clin North Am 1997; 24: 781 – 793en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMorales P, Golimbu M. Colonic urinary diversion: 10 years of experience. J Urol 1975; 113: 302 – 307en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJahnson S, Pedersen J. Cystectomy and urinary diversion during twenty years – complications and metabolic implications. Eur Urol 1993; 24: 343 – 349en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWood DP Jr, Bianco FJ Jr, Pontes JE, Heath MA, DaJusta D. Incidence and significance of positive urine cultures in patients with an orthotopic neobladder. J Urol 2003; 169: 2196 – 2199en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMills RD, Studer UE. Metabolic consequences of continent urinary diversion. J Urol 1999; 161: 1057 – 1066en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHolmes DG, Park GY, Thrasher JB, Kueker D, Weigel JW. Incidence of cholelithiasis in 125 continent urinary diversions. J Urol 2001; 165: 1897 – 1899en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFujisawa M, Gotoh A, Nakamura I et al. Long‐term assessment of serum vitamin B(12) concentrations in patients with various types of orthotopic intestinal neobladder. Urology 2000; 56: 236 – 240en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGanesan T, Khadra MH, Wallis J, Neal DE. Vitamin B12 malabsorption following bladder reconstruction or diversion with bowel segments. ANZ J Surg 2002; 72: 479 – 482en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStuder UE, Danuser H, Thalmann GN, Springer JP, Turner WH. Antireflux nipples or afferent tubular segments in 70 patients with ileal low pressure bladder substitutes: long‐term results of a prospective randomized trial. J Urol 1996; 156: 1913 – 1917en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoxer RJ, Fritzsche P, Skinner DG et al. Replacement of the ureter by small intestine: clinical application and results of the ileal ureter in 89 patients. J Urol 1979; 121: 728 – 731en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAusten M, Kalble T. Secondary malignancies in different forms of urinary diversion using isolated gut. J Urol 2004; 172: 831 – 838en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAli‐El‐Dein B, El‐Tabey N, Abdel‐Latif M, Abdel‐Rahim M, El‐Bahnasawy MS. Late uro‐ileal cancer after incorporation of ileum into the urinary tract. J Urol 2002; 167: 84 – 88en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStein R, Fisch M, Beetz R et al. Urinary diversion in children and young adults using the Mainz Pouch I technique. Br J Urol 1997; 79: 354 – 361en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKoch MO, McDougal WS. Bone demineralization following ureterosigmoid anastomosis: an experimental study in rats. J Urol 1988; 140: 856 – 859en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKock NG, Ghoneim MA, Lycke KG, Mahran MR. Urinary diversion to the augmented and valved rectum: preliminary results with a novel surgical procedure. J Urol 1988; 140: 1375 – 1379en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRink R, Retik A. Ureteroileocecal sigmoidostomy and avoidance of carcinoma of the colon. In King L, Stone A, Webster G eds, Bladder Reconstruction and Continent Urinary Diversion, St. Louis, MO: Mosby‐Year Book, 1991: 221en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTurnbull RB Jr. Intestinal stomas. Surg Clin North Am 1958; 38: 1361 – 1372en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHolmes DG, Thrasher JB, Park GY, Kueker DC, Weigel JW. Long‐term complications related to the modified Indiana pouch. Urology 2002; 60: 603 – 606en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBochner BH, McCreath WA, Aubey JJ et al. Use of an ureteroileocecal appendicostomy urinary reservoir in patients with recurrent pelvic malignancies treated with radiation. Gynecol Oncol 2004; 94: 140 – 146en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMirhashemi R, Lamrbou N, Hus N, Salom E, Penalver MA, Averette HE. The gastrointestinal complications of the Miami Pouch: a review of 77 cases. Gynecol Oncol 2004; 92: 220 – 224en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAngioli R, Estape R, Cantuaria G et al. Urinary complications of Miami pouch: trend of conservative management. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 179: 343 – 348en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGschwend JE. Bladder substitution. Curr Opin Urol 2003; 13: 477 – 482en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStenzl A, Holtl L. Orthotopic bladder reconstruction in women – what we have learned over the last decade. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2003; 47: 147 – 154en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarre PH, Herve JM, Botto H, Camey M. Update on the Camey II procedure. World J Urol 1996; 14: 27 – 28en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCancrini A, De Carli P, Pompeo V et al. Lower urinary tract reconstruction following cystectomy: experience and results in 96 patients using the orthotopic ileal bladder substitution of Studer et al. Eur Urol 1996; 29: 204 – 209en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceElmajian DA, Stein JP, Esrig D et al. The Kock ileal neobladder: updated experience in 295 male patients. J Urol 1996; 156: 920 – 925en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHautmann RE, de Petriconi R, Gottfried HW, Kleinschmidt K, Mattes R, Paiss T. The ileal neobladder: complications and functional results in 363 patients after 11 years of followup. J Urol 1999; 161: 422 – 428en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSteven K, Poulsen AL. The orthotopic Kock ileal neobladder: functional results, urodynamic features, complications and survival in 166 men. J Urol 2000; 164: 288 – 295en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAbol‐Enein H, Ghoneim MA. Functional results of orthotopic ileal neobladder with serous‐lined extramural ureteral reimplantation: experience with 450 patients. J Urol 2001; 165: 1427 – 1432en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMadersbacher S, Mohrle K, Burkhard F, Studer UE. Long‐term voiding pattern of patients with ileal orthotopic bladder substitutes. J Urol 2002; 167: 2052 – 2057en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarrion R, Arap S, Corcione G et al. A multi‐institutional study of orthotopic neobladders: functional results in men and women. BJU Int 2004; 93: 803 – 806en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSevin G, Soyupek S, Armagan A, Hoscan MB, Oksay T. Ileal orthotopic neobladder (modified Hautmann) via a shorter detubularized ileal segment: experience and results. BJU Int 2004; 94: 355 – 359en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStein JP, Dunn MD, Quek ML, Miranda G, Skinner DG. The orthotopic T pouch ileal neobladder: experience with 209 patients. J Urol 2004; 172: 584 – 587en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePantuck AJ, Han KR, Perrotti M, Weiss RE, Cummings KB. Ureteroenteric anastomosis in continent urinary diversion: long‐term results and complications of direct versus nonrefluxing techniques. J Urol 2000; 163: 450 – 455en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSimon J, Bartsch G Jr, Kufer R, Gschwend JE, Volkmer BG, Hautmann RE. Neobladder emptying failure in males: incidence, etiology and therapeutic options. J Urol 2006; 176: 1468 – 1472en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceArai Y, Okubo K, Konami T et al. Voiding function of orthotopic ileal neobladder in women. Urology 1999; 54: 44 – 49en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHautmann RE, de Petriconi R, Kleinschmidt K, Gottfried HW, Gschwend JE. Orthotopic ileal neobladder in females: impact of the urethral resection line on functional results. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2000; 11: 224 – 229; discussion 30en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStenzl A, Jarolim L, Coloby P et al. Urethra‐sparing cystectomy and orthotopic urinary diversion in women with malignant pelvic tumors. Cancer 2001; 92: 1864 – 1871en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStein JP, Ginsberg DA, Skinner DG. Indications and technique of the orthotopic neobladder in women. Urol Clin North Am 2002; 29: 725 – 734, xien_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSteers WD. Voiding dysfunction in the orthotopic neobladder. World J Urol 2000; 18: 330 – 337en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFarnham SB, Cookson MS. Surgical complications of urinary diversion. World J Urol 2004; 22: 157 – 167en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAli‐El‐Dein B, Gomha M, Ghoneim MA. Critical evaluation of the problem of chronic urinary retention after orthotopic bladder substitution in women. J Urol 2002; 168: 587 – 592en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDutta SC, Chang SC, Coffey CS, Smith JA Jr, Jack G, Cookson MS. Health related quality of life assessment after radical cystectomy: comparison of ileal conduit with continent orthotopic neobladder. J Urol 2002; 168: 164 – 167en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePorter MP, Penson DF. Health related quality of life after radical cystectomy and urinary diversion for bladder cancer: a systematic review and critical analysis of the literature. J Urol 2005; 173: 1318 – 1322en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFreeman JA, Tarter TA, Esrig D et al. Urethral recurrence in patients with orthotopic ileal neobladders. J Urol 1996; 156: 1615 – 1619en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLevinson AK, Johnson DE, Wishnow KI. Indications for urethrectomy in an era of continent urinary diversion. J Urol 1990; 144: 73 – 75en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTobisu K, Tanaka Y, Mizutani T, Kakizoe T. Transitional cell carcinoma of the urethra in men following cystectomy for bladder cancer: multivariate analysis for risk factors. J Urol 1991; 146: 1551 – 1554en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchellhammer PF, Whitmore WF Jr. Transitional cell carcinoma of the urethra in men having cystectomy for bladder cancer. J Urol 1976; 115: 56 – 60en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHerr HW, Donat SM, Bajorin DF. Post‐chemotherapy surgery in patients with unresectable or regionally metastatic bladder cancer. J Urol 2001; 165: 811 – 814en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDonat SM, Wei DC, McGuire MS, Herr HW. The efficacy of transurethral biopsy for predicting the long‐term clinical impact of prostatic invasive bladder cancer. J Urol 2001; 165: 1580 – 1584en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDonat SM, Genega EM, Herr HW, Reuter VE. Mechanisms of prostatic stromal invasion in patients with bladder cancer: clinical significance. J Urol 2001; 165: 1117 – 1120en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHardeman SW, Soloway MS. Urethral recurrence following radical cystectomy. J Urol 1990; 144: 666 – 669en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLebret T, Herve JM, Barre P et al. Urethral recurrence of transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. Predictive value of preoperative latero‐montanal biopsies and urethral frozen sections during prostatocystectomy. Eur Urol 1998; 33: 170 – 174en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStein JP, Esrig D, Freeman JA et al. Prospective pathologic analysis of female cystectomy specimens: risk factors for orthotopic diversion in women. Urology 1998; 51: 951 – 955en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMaralani S, Wood DP Jr, Grignon D, Banerjee M, Sakr W, Pontes JE. Incidence of urethral involvement in female bladder cancer: an anatomic pathologic study. Urology 1997; 50: 537 – 541en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAli‐el‐Dein B, Abdel‐Latif M, Ashamallah A, Abdel‐Rahim M, Ghoneim M. Local urethral recurrence after radical cystectomy and orthotopic bladder substitution in women: a prospective study. J Urol 2004; 171: 275 – 278en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStenzl A, Bartsch G, Rogatsch H. The remnant urothelium after reconstructive bladder surgery. Eur Urol 2002; 41: 124 – 131en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHautmann RE, Simon J. Ileal neobladder and local recurrence of bladder cancer: patterns of failure and impact on function in men. J Urol 1999; 162: 1963 – 1966en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSrinivas S, Mahalati K, Freiha FS. Methotrexate tolerance in patients with ileal conduits and continent diversions. Cancer 1998; 82: 1134 – 1136en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHautmann RE. Urinary diversion: ileal conduit to neobladder. J Urol 2003; 169: 834 – 842en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNorth AC, Lakshmanan Y. Malignancy associated with the use of intestinal segments in the urinary tract. Urol Oncol 2007; 25: 165 – 167en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSpence HM, Hoffman WW, Fosmire GP. Tumour of the colon as a late complication of ureterosigmoidostomy for exstrophy of the bladder. Br J Urol 1979; 51: 466 – 470en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAzimuddin K, Khubchandani IT, Stasik JJ, Rosen L, Riether RD. Neoplasia after ureterosigmoidostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1999; 42: 1632 – 1638en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFichtner J. Follow‐up after urinary diversion. Urol Int 1999; 63: 40 – 45en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWoodhouse CR. Guidelines for monitoring of patients with ureterosigmoidostomy. Gut 2002; 51 ( Suppl. 5 ): V15 – 16en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKhan MN, Naqvi AH, Lee RE. Carcinoma of sigmoid colon following urinary diversion: a case report and review of literature. World J Surg Oncol 2004; 2: 20en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHurlstone DP, Wells JM, Bhala N, McAlindon ME. Ureterosigmoid anastomosis: risk of colorectal cancer and implications for colonoscopists. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 59: 248 – 254en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMadersbacher S, Schmidt J, Eberle JM et al. Long‐term outcome of ileal conduit diversion. J Urol 2003; 169: 985 – 990en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRichie JP. Intestinal loop urinary diversion in children. J Urol 1974; 111: 687 – 689en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchmidt JD, Hawtrey CE, Flocks RH, Culp DA. Complications, results and problems of ileal conduit diversions. J Urol 1973; 109: 210 – 216en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcDougal WS. Bladder reconstruction following cystectomy by uretero‐ileo‐colourethrostomy. J Urol 1986; 135: 698 – 701en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDretler SP. The pathogenesis of urinary tract calculi occurring after ileal conduit diversion. I. Clinical study. II. Conduit study. 3. Prevention. J Urol 1973; 109: 204 – 209en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKilleen KP, Libertino JA. Management of bowel and urinary tract complications after urinary diversion. Urol Clin North Am 1988; 15: 183 – 194en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceParekh DJ, Gilbert WB, Koch MO, Smith JA Jr. Continent urinary reconstruction versus ileal conduit: a contemporary single‐institution comparison of perioperative morbidity and mortality. Urology 2000; 55: 852 – 855en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWebster C, Bukkapatnam R, Seigne JD et al. Continent colonic urinary reservoir (Florida pouch): long‐term surgical complications (greater than 11 years). J Urol 2003; 169: 174 – 176en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
bju12121.pdf
Size:
207.1KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.