Show simple item record

Race, women and depression: The role of marriage and socioeconomic status.

dc.contributor.authorGazmararian, Julie Anooshen_US
dc.contributor.advisorJames, Sherman A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-02-24T16:12:42Z
dc.date.available2014-02-24T16:12:42Z
dc.date.issued1992en_US
dc.identifier.other(UMI)AAI9303737en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:9303737en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/103075
dc.description.abstractThe relationship between race and depression in a national population sample of black and white women, 25-64 years old, was investigated. It was hypothesized that black women would report higher levels of depression symptomatology than white women and that race differences in depression would be modified by both socioeconomic status and marital status. Depression was measured by an abbreviated form of the Centers for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale (CESD-11); those individuals scoring in the upper 20% were classified as depressed. Socioeconomic status was determined by education, income, and poverty measures; marital status was categorized as married or not married; and potential confounders examined were age, support from friends/relatives, number of confidants, religious participation, employment, life events, physical activity, body mass index, and chronic conditions. Results indicated that the crude prevalence of depression for black women was almost twice that for white women (34% versus 19%). Socioeconomic status modified the race difference in depression. Specifically, the significant race difference appeared only among the nonpoor (OR = 2.3, 95% CI: 1.3, 3.8) rather than the poor (OR = 1.3, 95% CI: 0.7, 2.1) and among those with at least some college education (OR = 2.4, 95% CI: 1.6, 3.7) rather than those with less than a high school education (OR = 1.6, 95% CI: 0.8, 1.6). Marital status also modified the race effect, in that a more pronounced race difference was observed for the married (OR = 2.0, 95% CI: 1.4, 3.0) than the unmarried (OR = 1.6, 95% CI: 1.1, 2.5). These effects persisted after controlling for known confounders. Additional exploratory analyses examined marital status within poverty and education strata. These analyses revealed that significant racial differences appeared only among the married nonpoor women (OR = 2.4, 95% CI: 1.6, 3.5) or the married higher educated women (OR = 3.0, 95% CI: 1.7, 5.3), findings which persisted after controlling for known confounders. Three psychosocial factors (financial stress, responsibility for helping others, and quality of the marriage) were subsequently explored as possible explanations for these findings. Financial stress and responsibility for helping others proved unimportant; however, controlling for marital quality reduced the excess odds of depression for nonpoor married black women 34% and the excess for better educated, married black women 27%. Potential methodological and substantive explanations of these findings are discussed and several recommendations for future research are offered.en_US
dc.format.extent181 p.en_US
dc.subjectPsychology, Socialen_US
dc.subjectHealth Sciences, Public Healthen_US
dc.subjectSociology, Ethnic and Racial Studiesen_US
dc.titleRace, women and depression: The role of marriage and socioeconomic status.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineEpidemiologic Scienceen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/103075/1/9303737.pdf
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of 9303737.pdf : Restricted to UM users only.en_US
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.