Show simple item record

The effect of stereotype vulnerability on women's math performance.

dc.contributor.authorSpencer, Steven Johnen_US
dc.contributor.advisorSteele, Claude M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-02-24T16:16:33Z
dc.date.available2014-02-24T16:16:33Z
dc.date.issued1993en_US
dc.identifier.other(UMI)AAI9332169en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:9332169en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/103673
dc.description.abstractFive studies manipulated women's vulnerability to being stereotyped while taking a standardized test. Stereotype vulnerability was identified as a condition in which members of stigmatized groups experience a sense of vulnerability to devaluation--a devaluation that alleges a category-based inferiority. In all five studies stereotype vulnerability had a pronounced effect on women's math performance. In Study 1, equally-prepared men and women took difficult math and English tests. They performed equally well on the English test, but on the math test where women were vulnerable to stereotype-based evaluations they underperformed in comparison to men. In Study 2, equally-prepared men and women took either a difficult or an easy math test. We reasoned that on the easy math test women would be less vulnerable to stereotype-based evaluations, as their performance would make a stereotype-consistent evaluation less plausible. Women and men performed equally well on the easier math test, but women again underperformed in comparison to men on the difficult test. In Study 3, we directly manipulated the relevance of the gender stereotype to performance on the math test. Equally-prepared men and women took a math test that was characterized as producing gender differences and a math test that was characterized as not producing gender differences. When subjects thought gender was relevant to the test, women underperformed in comparison to men; however, when the stereotype was irrelevant, women performed just as well as men. In Studies 4 & 5, we manipulated subjects' expectancies about the test demonstrating that the effects of the stereotype vulnerability manipulations in these experiments were not mediated by their effect on subjects' performance expectations. These experiments also demonstrated that when women could attribute their problems and frustrations on the test to the nature of the test rather than to their gender, their stereotype vulnerability decreased and their performance increased. The theoretical significance of stereotype vulnerability was outlined and the practical implications were discussed.en_US
dc.format.extent81 p.en_US
dc.subjectPsychology, Socialen_US
dc.subjectWomen's Studiesen_US
dc.subjectPsychology, Experimentalen_US
dc.titleThe effect of stereotype vulnerability on women's math performance.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplinePsychologyen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/103673/1/9332169.pdf
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of 9332169.pdf : Restricted to UM users only.en_US
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.