Show simple item record

An integrated versus a history-centered arrangement of social studies content used by full-time Islamic schools in the United States.

dc.contributor.authorSelby, Karen Lynnen_US
dc.contributor.advisorWixson, Karenen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-02-24T16:18:48Z
dc.date.available2014-02-24T16:18:48Z
dc.date.issued1994en_US
dc.identifier.other(UMI)AAI9423313en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:9423313en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/104033
dc.description.abstractAs a cultural minority, Muslim American students need to become reflective citizens of the United States who are able to balance their rights and responsibilities as members of both an international Muslim community and a national community of Americans. A central mission of schooling in the United States is to prepare students for participation as citizens in a pluralistic democracy, but can this be achieved while respecting students' cultural identity as Muslims? The purpose of this study was to look at the contribution of elementary social studies curricula to this preparation. The study examined two research hypotheses. The first hypothesis was that an integrated curriculum arrangement of social studies content would increase students' ability to produce writing which evidences a critical Islamic perspective. The second hypothesis was that a history-centered curriculum arrangement of social studies content would increase students' historical understanding. The differentiation between an integrated curriculum arrangement versus a history-centered curriculum arrangement was a reflection of two competing conceptions of social studies reflected in the professional literature. The hypotheses of this study were explored through instructional interventions in full-time Islamic Schools. The integrated curriculum intervention which used a focus question meant to contribute to students' participating in civic decision making as Muslim Americans. The history-centered intervention which used historical themes to build students' historical literacy. To make cross group comparisons, students wrote a persuasive essay to measure their critical Islamic perspective and completed a multiple choice measure on their historical understanding. No statistically significant differences were found between groups due to limitations of the study. The lack of statistical significance in the results of this study was most likely due to limitations in the design. However, this study does contribute a preliminary method for measuring students' critical Islamic perspective. This was viewed as an important outcome because it has implications for how the needs of cultural minorities might be addressed, even in a public school setting.en_US
dc.format.extent168 p.en_US
dc.subjectEducation, Elementaryen_US
dc.subjectEducation, Religiousen_US
dc.subjectEducation, Social Sciencesen_US
dc.titleAn integrated versus a history-centered arrangement of social studies content used by full-time Islamic schools in the United States.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineEducation and Psychologyen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/104033/1/9423313.pdf
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of 9423313.pdf : Restricted to UM users only.en_US
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.