Show simple item record

The effects of social support on the well-being of Japanese caregivers of demented elders.

dc.contributor.authorYamada, Hirokoen_US
dc.contributor.advisorFeld, Sheilaen_US
dc.contributor.advisorAntonucci, Toni C.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-02-24T16:20:02Z
dc.date.available2014-02-24T16:20:02Z
dc.date.issued1994en_US
dc.identifier.other(UMI)AAI9501067en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:9501067en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/104223
dc.description.abstractThis study investigated the well-being of 127 caregivers of Japanese demented elderly. Data were gathered through interviews or self-administered questionnaires from members of organizations which helped caregivers in three Japanese prefectures. A model was developed to clarify the effects of specific caregiving stressors and the main and buffering effects of specific types of social support on five aspects of caregiver's well-being. The study also explored the effects of the relationship of caregivers to the elder (spouse, daughter, and daughter-in-law) on the caregiver's well-being. Major findings were: (1) Three identified stressors (Elder's ADLs, Elder's Problem Behaviors, and Financial Condition) had harmful effects on caregivers' well-being, however, different stressors had more impact on particular outcomes. Elder's ADLs had more impact on caregiver's physical well-being, elder's Problem Behavior had more impact on psychological well-being, and Financial Condition had pervasive effects on well-being. (2) Satisfaction with three types of support (Tangible, Informational, and Emotional) had main effects on well-being, but each had significant effects on only certain aspects of well-being: Tangible support affected Self-Rated Health. Informational support affected Depressive Symptoms and Quality of Living. Emotional support affected Depressive Symptoms, Self-Rated Health, and Quality of Living. Problems with support affected all aspects of measured well-being. (3) Informational and Emotional support had buffering effects on Elder's ADLs. (4) Informational and emotional support had significantly amplifying effects on poor Financial condition. (5) Caregivers in different relationships to the elder duffered in support and well-being. Daughters-in-law tended to have more satisfaction with three types of support and had significantly more problems with support than the other two groups. Both daughters and daughters-in-law reported more depressive symptoms, poorer self-rated health, and higher physical symptoms than spouse caregivers. Social support had more positive effects on well-being for daughters and daughters-in-law than for spouses. Overall, the results support the main effects model for stressors and social support, but provide only limited support for social support as a buffer.en_US
dc.format.extent264 p.en_US
dc.subjectGerontologyen_US
dc.subjectPsychology, Socialen_US
dc.subjectSociology, Individual and Family Studiesen_US
dc.subjectSociology, Ethnic and Racial Studiesen_US
dc.titleThe effects of social support on the well-being of Japanese caregivers of demented elders.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineSocial Work and Psychologyen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/104223/1/9501067.pdf
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of 9501067.pdf : Restricted to UM users only.en_US
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.