Show simple item record

In search of 'respect': Culture, authority, and coercion on an Ecuadorian hacienda.

dc.contributor.authorLyons, Barry Jayen_US
dc.contributor.advisorMannheim, Bruceen_US
dc.contributor.advisorOrtner, Sherryen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-02-24T16:20:50Z
dc.date.available2014-02-24T16:20:50Z
dc.date.issued1994en_US
dc.identifier.other(UMI)AAI9513421en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:9513421en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/104345
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation is a study of the relationship between Quichua-speaking indigenous laborers, indigenous authorities, and Hispanic-mestizo bosses on an hacienda in Chimborazo province, Ecuador, during the first six decades of this century. It is based on interviews and ethnographic fieldwork among former hacienda laborers and archival research. The focus is the nature of authority on the hacienda and the question of hegemony. The study contributes to the ongoing reconsideration of Andean culture and its relationship to domination and resistance, and examines the cultural strategies of persuasion associated with coercion on the hacienda. Principles of reciprocity and redistribution were fundamental to indigenous understandings of social relations, of the authority of elders and ritual leaders, and of agricultural production. The relationship between the hacienda and indigenous laborers can be seen in part as a conflictive pact of reciprocity, in which the hacienda gained some legitimacy through providing laborers with land and other benefits. At the same time, laborers condemned the hacienda for its failure to treat labor as a favor, its 'stinginess' with respect to distributions and pasture, and its orientation to indefinite accumulation. One expression of this critique was the tradition that landlords were in league with the devil, who made their plantings fertile. Individuals' compliant or defiant stances towards hacienda authority were strategic choices heavily influenced by coercion. At the same time, such stances were linked to moral judgments and gender conceptions. There was an implicit debate among laborers themselves, as well as with bosses, over the moral interpretation of hacienda labor and discipline. The terms of the debate were drawn from the domain of symbolic representations and practices associated with 'respect' (respeto). Indigenous ritual authorities were responsible for maintaining 'respect' through moral vigilance, guidance, and correction, including ritual admonishment and punishment. Hacienda authority played a similar role, and the two types of authority were indeed overlapping and mutually supportive. 'Respect' was at once an aspect of Hispanic domination and a theme in indigenous culture, the language of coercion and a symbol of morality. As such it also helped shape the interpretation and outcomes of resistance.en_US
dc.format.extent440 p.en_US
dc.subjectAnthropology, Culturalen_US
dc.subjectHistory, Latin Americanen_US
dc.subjectSociology, Ethnic and Racial Studiesen_US
dc.titleIn search of 'respect': Culture, authority, and coercion on an Ecuadorian hacienda.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineAnthropologyen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/104345/1/9513421.pdf
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of 9513421.pdf : Restricted to UM users only.en_US
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.