Show simple item record

Home observations of high-risk premature infants and their mothers during the first year of life: A microanalytic behavioral study.

dc.contributor.authorFriedman, Janet Mannen_US
dc.contributor.advisorSmuts, Barbara B.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-02-24T16:28:32Z
dc.date.available2014-02-24T16:28:32Z
dc.date.issued1991en_US
dc.identifier.other(UMI)AAI9135596en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:9135596en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/105530
dc.description.abstractThis study investigates behavioral interactions among mothers and their extremely low birth weight (ELBW, birth weight $<$ 1250 grams) preterm infants at four and eight months of age from an ethological-evolutionary perspective. The main objective is to determine whether these behavioral patterns support the "compensation" or the "overstimulation" hypothesis. The "compensation" hypothesis suggests that mothers are responding appropriately to the signals and special needs of their ELBW infant, resulting in mutually rewarding engagement. The "overstimulation" hypothesis suggests that mothers are overactive and insensitive to infant signals, causing ELBW infants to withdraw and/or fuss, thus decreasing the likelihood of positive engagement. A second objective was to examine how infant health characteristics affected maternal behavior towards ELBW twins. Naturalistic observations of mothers and 94 singleton infants (41 ELBW and 53 full-term) and 14 ELBW twin infants were conducted at four and eight months of infant age (corrected for gestational age in the ELBW group). Simultaneous and sequential frequencies and durations of behaviors were recorded continuously during home observations. Behaviors were examined in isolation (durations and frequencies), and in context (rates and durations of co-occurring behaviors). Analyses of group (ELBW vs. full-term) behavioral differences at four and eight months supported the "compensation hypothesis." Mothers engaged their ELBW infants in more proximate interactions relative to mothers of full-term infants, resulting in equal amounts of reciprocal engagement between groups. ELBW infants were less vocal than full-term infants, but sequential and contextual analyses of vocal patterns revealed that ELBW infants were not less vocally responsive. Risk status of ELBW infants also affected maternal behavior. Mothers were more attentive to higher-risk ELBW infants compared to lower-risk ELBW infants, although the nature of this involvement differed depending on the child's characteristics. ELBW infants who experienced neurological insult received more proximate stimulation, whereas ELBW infants who experienced severe respiratory problems received more distal stimulation at eight months. However, under more stressful circumstances, such as with ELBW twins, mothers gave preferential treatment to their healthier infant. Overall, mothers of preterm infants are best characterized as adjusting to, not insensitive to, infant signals and characteristics.en_US
dc.format.extent302 p.en_US
dc.subjectPsychology, Developmentalen_US
dc.subjectHealth Sciences, Human Developmenten_US
dc.titleHome observations of high-risk premature infants and their mothers during the first year of life: A microanalytic behavioral study.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplinePsychologyen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/105530/1/9135596.pdf
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of 9135596.pdf : Restricted to UM users only.en_US
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.