Show simple item record

Relative black male employment among business establishments: Relation to management orientation toward affirmative action, organizational context, and organizational characteristics.

dc.contributor.authorWalker, James Titus, Jr.en_US
dc.contributor.advisorGoldberg, Daviden_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-02-24T16:30:38Z
dc.date.available2014-02-24T16:30:38Z
dc.date.issued1990en_US
dc.identifier.other(UMI)AAI9023663en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:9023663en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/105831
dc.description.abstractThe economic status of the black population relative to the white population rose dramatically during the 1960's and the early to mid-1970's. Since the mid- to late 1970's, there has been a slowdown in the rise in black economic status, and presently a significant deficit exists, compared to the white population. Part of the increasing racial gap in economic status may stem from differences among business establishments in the relative level of black employment, which in turn is partly due to establishments locating further from the black population. Theoretical approaches to the problem of differences among business establishments in relative employment of blacks have focused on bigoted forms of behavior by employers and workers. Empirical analyses have explained this problem as due to various firm and union arrangements for recruitment, hiring, training and promotion, and due to informal social organization in companies. This dissertation explores relative black male employment across establishments as a function of the context of the organization (geographic location, unionization, and government influence), management orientation toward affirmative action, and organizational characteristics (size, proportion white collar, formalization, and centralization). The data used are from interviews made in 1972 with the top manager, the director of personnel, and the most representative first-line supervisor in a sample of 128 business establishments in the Detroit, Michigan, Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area. The study finds that management attitude toward affirmative action, city location of establishment, centralization of personnel decisions, and formalization of meetings had a positive effect on relative black male employment, which was derived from actual and expected black male employment. Size, unionization, federal contracts, and proportion white collar were negatively related to relative black male employment. A significant study result is the importance of central city location of establishments as a determinant of relative black male employment. This suggests that future efforts to ameliorate black-white economic inequalities will probably be stymied if: the black population continues to be concentrated in central cities; public transportation between the central city and the suburb remains poor; and establishments continue to move from the central city to the suburbs.en_US
dc.format.extent142 p.en_US
dc.subjectBlack Studiesen_US
dc.subjectGeographyen_US
dc.subjectSociology, Industrial and Labor Relationsen_US
dc.subjectSociology, Ethnic and Racial Studiesen_US
dc.titleRelative black male employment among business establishments: Relation to management orientation toward affirmative action, organizational context, and organizational characteristics.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineSociologyen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/105831/1/9023663.pdf
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of 9023663.pdf : Restricted to UM users only.en_US
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.