View Item 

Show simple item record

Postbrushing and fine‐needle aspiration biopsy follow‐up and treatment options for patients with pancreatobiliary lesions: The papanicolaou society of cytopathology guidelines

dc.contributor.authorKurtycz, Danielen_US
dc.contributor.authorTabatabai, Z. Lauraen_US
dc.contributor.authorMichaels, Claireen_US
dc.contributor.authorYoung, Nancyen_US
dc.contributor.authorSchmidt, C. Maxen_US
dc.contributor.authorFarrell, Jamesen_US
dc.contributor.authorGopal, Deepaken_US
dc.contributor.authorSimeone, Dianeen_US
dc.contributor.authorMerchant, Nipun B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorField, Andrewen_US
dc.contributor.authorPitman, Martha Bishopen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-21T18:02:32Z
dc.date.availableWITHHELD_13_MONTHSen_US
dc.date.available2014-05-21T18:02:32Z
dc.date.issued2014-04en_US
dc.identifier.citationKurtycz, Daniel; Tabatabai, Z. Laura; Michaels, Claire; Young, Nancy; Schmidt, C. Max; Farrell, James; Gopal, Deepak; Simeone, Diane; Merchant, Nipun B.; Field, Andrew; Pitman, Martha Bishop (2014). "Postbrushing and fine‐needle aspiration biopsy follow‐up and treatment options for patients with pancreatobiliary lesions: The papanicolaou society of cytopathology guidelines." Diagnostic Cytopathology 42(4): 363-371.en_US
dc.identifier.issn8755-1039en_US
dc.identifier.issn1097-0339en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/106662
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.publisherMcGraw Hillen_US
dc.subject.otherGuidelinesen_US
dc.subject.otherTreatmenten_US
dc.subject.otherManagementen_US
dc.subject.otherCytologyen_US
dc.subject.otherPancreasen_US
dc.subject.otherPSCen_US
dc.titlePostbrushing and fine‐needle aspiration biopsy follow‐up and treatment options for patients with pancreatobiliary lesions: The papanicolaou society of cytopathology guidelinesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPathologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/106662/1/dc23121.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/dc.23121en_US
dc.identifier.sourceDiagnostic Cytopathologyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFisher W, Andersen D, Bell R, Saluja A. Pancreas. In: Brunicardi C, editor. Schwartz's principles of surgery. 9 ed. New York: McGraw‐Hill; 2010. p 1217 – 1237.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilentz RE, Iacobuzio‐Donahue CA, Argani P, et al. Loss of expression of Dpc4 in pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia: Evidence that DPC4 inactivation occurs late in neoplastic progression. Cancer Res 2000; 60: 2002 – 2006.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTseng JF, Warshaw AL, Sahani DV, Lauwers GY, Rattner DW, Castillo CF‐D. Serous cystadenoma of the pancreas. Ann Surg 2005; 123: 111 – 118.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrandwein SL, Farrell JJ, Centeno BA, Brugge WR. Detection and tumor staging of malignancy in cystic, intraductal, and solid tumors of the pancreas by EUS. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 53: 722 – 727.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIto T, Igarashi H, Jensen RT. Therapy of metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs): Recent insights and advances. J Gastroenterol [Internet]. 2012; 47: 941 – 960. Available from: http://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=22886480&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSyversen U, Ramstad H, Gamme K, Qvigstad G, Falkmer S, Waldum HL. Clinical significance of elevated serum chromogranin A levels. Scand J Gastroenterol [Internet]. 2004; 39: 969 – 973. Available from: http://informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00365520410003362.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKlimstra DS. Pathology reporting of neuroendocrine tumors: Essential elements for accurate diagnosis, classification, and staging. Semin Oncol 2013; 40: 23 – 36.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKlimstra DS, Modlin IR, Coppola D, Lloyd R, Suster S. The pathologic classification or neuroendocrine tumors [Internet]. Pancreas 2010; 39: 707 – 712. Available from: http://sfx.wisconsin.edu/wisc?sid=Entrez:PubMed&id=pmid:20664470.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCouvelard A, Deschamps L, Ravaud P, et al. Heterogeneity of tumor prognostic markers: A reproducibility study applied to liver metastases of pancreatic endocrine tumors. Mod Pathol 2008; 22: 273 – 281.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYang Z, Tang LH, Klimstra DS. Effect of tumor heterogeneity on the assessment of Ki67 labeling index in well‐differentiated neuroendocrine tumors metastatic to the liver: Implications for prognostic stratification. Am J Surg Pathol 2011; 35: 853 – 860.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) for Neuroendocrine Tumors V.2.2014. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc 2013. Available at: http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/f_guidelines.asp#neuroendocrine. Accessed December 20, 2013.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePlockinger U, Rindi G, Arnold R, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of neuroendocrine gastrointestinal tumours. Neuroendocrinology 2004; 80: 394 – 424.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAbraham SC. DSKREWCJYKCMBJLCT‐TWRHH. Solid‐pseudopapillary tumors of the pancreas are genetically distinct from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas and almost always harbor β‐catenin mutations. Multiple values selected. Am Soc Invest Pathol 2002; 160: 755 – 765.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBasturk O, Coban I, Adsay NV. Pancreatic cysts: Pathologic classification, differential diagnosis, and clinical implications. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2009; 133: 423 – 438. sfx.wisconsin.edu.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTanaka M, et al. International consensus guidelines 2012 for the management of IPMN and MCN of the pancreas. Pancreatology 2012; 12: 183 – 197.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePitman MB. Revised international consensus guidelines for the management of patients with mucinous cysts. Cancer Cytopathology 2012; 120: 361 – 365.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePitman MB, Lewandrowski K, Shen J, Sahani D, Brugge W, Fernández‐del Castillo C. Pancreatic cysts. Cancer Cytopathol 2009; 118: 1 – 13.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFisher W, Andersen D, Bell R, Saluja A. Pancreas. In: Brunicardi C, editor. Schwartz's principles of surgery. 9 ed. New York: McGraw‐Hill; 2010. p 1217 – 1237.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePitman MB, et al. High‐grade atypical epithelial cells in pancreatic mucinous cysts are a more accurate predictor of malignancy than "positive" cytology. Cancer Cytopathol 2010; 118: 434 – 440.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMino‐Kenudson M, et al. Prognosis of invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm depends on histological and precursor epithelial subtypes. Gut 2011; 60: 1712 – 1720.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEltoum IA, Eloubeidi MA, Chhieng DC, et al. Cytologic grade independently predicts survival of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Am J Clin Pathol 2005; 124: 697 – 707.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTempero MA, Arnoletti JP, Behrman SW, et al. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma guidelines, Version 2.2012. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2012; 10: 703 – 713.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGillen S, Schuster T, Meyer zum Bu s ¨ chenfelde C, Friess H, Kleef J. Preoperative/neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of response and resection percentages. Res Dev Disabil 2010; 7: e1000267.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYachida S, Vakiani E, White CM, et al. Small cell and large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas of the pancreas are genetically similar and distinct from well‐differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Am J Surg Pathol 2012; 36: 173 – 184.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoland CL, Bian A, Mansour JC, et al. Survival impact of malignant pancreatic neuroendocrine and islet cell neoplasm phenotypes. J Surg Oncol 2012; 105: 595 – 600.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYamaguchi K, Tanaka M, Committee for Revision of Clinical Guidelines for Pancreatic Cancer of Japan Pancreas Society. EBM based clinical guidelines for pancreatic cancer 2009 from the Japan Pancreas Society: A synopsis. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2011; 41: 836 – 840.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePancreatic Section of the British Society of Gastroenterology, Pancreatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland, Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland, Royal College of Pathologists, Special Interest Group for Gastro‐Intestinal Radiology. Guidelines for the management of patients with pancreatic cancer periampullary and ampullary carcinomas. Gut 2005; 54 ( Suppl V ): v1 – v16. doi: 10.1136/gut.2004.057059.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTanaka M, Castillo CF‐D, Adsay V, et al. et al. International consensus guidelines 2012 for the management of IPMN and MCN of the pancreas. Pancreatology 2012; 12: 183 – 197.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGenevay M, Mino‐Kenudson M, Yaeger K, et al. Cytology adds value to imaging studies for risk assessment of malignancy in pancreatic mucinous cysts. Ann Surg 2011; 254: 977 – 983.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHruban RH, Adsay NV. Molecular classification of neoplasms of the pancreas. Hum Pathol 2009; 40: 612 – 623.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceElek G, Gyokeres T, Schafer E. Early diagnosis of pancreatobiliary duct malignancies by brush cytology and biopsy. Pathol Oncol Res 2005; 11: 145 – 155.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEloubeidi MA, Jhala D, Chhieng DC, et al. Yield of endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine‐needle aspiration biopsy in patients with suspected pancreatic carcinoma. Cancer Cytopathol 2003; 99: 285 – 292.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStewart CJ, Mills PR, Carter R, et al. Brush cytology in the assessment of pancreatico‐biliary strictures: A review of 406 cases. J Clin Pathol 2001; 54: 449 – 455.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKocjan G, Rode J, Lees WR. Percutaneous fine needle aspiration of cytology of the pancreas. J Clin Pathol 1989; 42: 341 – 347.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChong I. Cunningham. Pancreatic cancer. In: Longo, editor. Harrison's principles of internal medicine. 19 ed. New York, NY: McGraw Hill; p 786 – 789.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSpier B, Johnson E, Gopal D, et al. Predictors of malignancy and recommendedfollow‐up for patients with negative endoscopicultrasound‐guided fine‐needle aspiration of suspectedpancreatic lesions. Can J Gastroenterol 2009; 23: 279 – 286.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWani S, Gupta N, Gaddam S, et al. A comparative study of endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration with and without a stylet. Dig Dis Sci 2011; 56: 2409 – 2414.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGimeno‐García AZ, Elwassief A. How to improve the success of endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of pancreatic lesions. J Interv Gastroenterol 2012; 2: 31 – 36.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNoh KW, Wallace MB. Endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine‐needle aspiration in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Medscape General Med 2005; 7: 1 – 5.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSuzuki R, Lee JH, Krishna SG, et al. Repeat endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine needle aspiration for solid pancreatic lesions at a tertiary referral center will alter the initial inconclusive result. J Gastrointest Liver Dis 2013; 22: 183 – 187.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGagovic V, Spier B, DeLee R, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound fine‐needle aspiration characteristics of primary adenocarcinoma versus other malignant neoplasms of the pancreas. Can J Gastroenterol 2012; 26: 691 – 696.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceXie HB, Cornwell R, Grossman JE, Hoerl HD, Kurtycz DFI. Bronchoscopy‐guided transtracheal and transbronchial fine‐needle aspiration biopsy: A 5‐year institutional review of 111 cases. Diagn Cytopathol [Internet]. 2002; 27: 276 – 281. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/ 10.1002/dc.10187.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKarim Z, Walker B, Lam E. Lymphoepithelial cysts of the pancreas: The use of endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine‐needle aspiration in diagnosis. Can J Gastroenterol 2010; 24: 348 – 350. Available from: http://pubget.com/paper/20559575?institution=.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRosch T, Hofrichter K, Frimberger E, et al. ERCP or EUS for tissue diagnosis of biliary strictures? A prospective comparative study. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 60: 390 – 396.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWiersema MJ, Vilmann P. EUS‐guided FNAB. Gastrointest Endosc 1997; 45: 243 – 250.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReddy N, Wilcox CM, Tamhane A, Eloubeidi MA, Varadarajulu S. Protocol‐based medical management of post‐ERCP pancreatitis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 23: 385 – 392.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDel Chiaro M, Verbeke C, Salvia R, et al. European experts consensus statement on cystic tumours of the pancreas. Dig Liver Dis 2013.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFarrell JJ, Fernández‐del Castillo C. Pancreatic cystic neoplasms: Management and unanswered questions. Gastroenterology 2013; 144: 1303 – 1315.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLee LS, Saltzman JR. EUS‐guided FNA of pancreatic cysts. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005; 3: 231 – 236.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEloubeidi MA, Tamhane A. EUS‐guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: A learning curve with 300 consecutive procedures. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61: 700 – 708.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEloubeidie MA, Chen VK. EUS‐guided FNA of suspected cholangiocarcinoma [Internet]. 2004 ed. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004; 2: 209 – 213. Available from: http://sfx.wisconsin.edu/wisc?sid=Entrez:PubMed&id=pmid:15017604.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKlapman JB, Logrono R, Dye CE, Waxman I. Clinical impact of on‐site cytopathology interpretation on endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine needle aspiration. Am J Gastroenterol 2003; 98: 1289 – 1294.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoparty B, Logrono R, Nealon WH, Waxman I, Raju GS, Pasricha PJ. The role of endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine‐needle aspiration in distinguishing pancreatic cystic lesions. Diagn Cytopathol 2007; 35: 18 – 25.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEloubeidi MA, Tamhane A, Varadarajulu S, Wilcox CM. Frequency of major complications after EUS‐guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: A prospective evaluation. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63: 622 – 629.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTrikudanathan G, Navaneethan U, Vege SS. Modern treatment of patients with chronic pancreatitis. Gastroenterol Clin North America 2012; 41: 63 – 76.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceErickson RA, Garza AA. EUS with EUS‐guided fine‐needle aspiration as the first endoscopic test for the evaluation of obstructive jaundice. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 53: 475 – 484.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSugumar A. Diagnosis and management of autoimmune pancreatitis. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2012; 41: 9 – 22. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.gtc.2011.12.008.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceErickson RA, Garza AA. EUS and EUS‐guided FNA as first endoscopic test for the evaluation of obstructive jaundice. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 53: 475 – 484.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSugumar A. Diagnosis and management of auto. Gastroenterol Clin North America 2012; 41: 9 – 22.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTrikudanathan G, Navaneethan U, Vege SS. Modern treatment of patients with chronic pancreatitis. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2012; 41: 63 – 76. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.gtc.2011.12.009.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBasturk O, Coban I, Adsay NV. Pancreatic cysts: Pathologic classification, differential diagnosis, and clinical implications. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2009; 133: 423 – 438. Available from: http://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=19260748&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNasr J, Sanders M, Fasanella K, Khalid A, McGrath K. Lymphoepithelial cysts of the pancreas: an EUS case series. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 68: 170 – 173.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMaitra A, Kern SE, Hruban RH. Molecular pathogenesis of pancreatic cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2006; 20: 211 – 226.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHruban RH, Adsay NV. Molecular classification of neoplasms of the pancreas. Hum Pathol 2009; 40: 612 – 623. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.humpath.2009.01.008.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
dc23121.pdf
Size:
255.3KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.