Show simple item record

Public Interest in Medical Research Participation: Differences by Volunteer Status and Study Type

dc.contributor.authorCobb, Enesha M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSinger, Dianne C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDavis, Matthew M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-23T15:59:50Z
dc.date.available2015-06-01T15:48:46Zen_US
dc.date.issued2014-04en_US
dc.identifier.citationCobb, Enesha M.; Singer, Dianne C.; Davis, Matthew M. (2014). "Public Interest in Medical Research Participation: Differences by Volunteer Status and Study Type." Clinical and Translational Science 7(2): 145-149.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1752-8054en_US
dc.identifier.issn1752-8062en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/106963
dc.description.abstractPurpose We assessed national levels of public interest in medical research participation (MRP) and factors associated with interest as a healthy volunteer; as a diagnosed volunteer; and in seven study types. Method Cross‐sectional, Web‐based survey of the US population in June 2012. Descriptive statistics estimated interest in MRP and multivariable logistic regression determined associations between respondent‐level predictors and interest in MRP. Results Of 2,668 respondents (response rate = 61%), 41% were interested in MRP as healthy volunteers and 60% as diagnosed volunteers. Respondents with some college (OR = 1.54, 1.09–2.19) or higher education (OR = 1.86, 1.29–2.70) had higher adjusted odds of interest as healthy volunteers. Non‐Hispanic black race (OR = 0.56, 0.37–0.86) and education below high school (OR = 0.57, 0.35–0.92) were associated with lower adjusted odds of interest as diagnosed volunteers. Non‐Hispanic black race was associated with lower odds of interest in medication trials as diagnosed volunteers (OR = 0.61, 0.40–0.93). Conclusions We found high levels of interest in MRP that contrast with low levels of prior research participation. Interest is higher in medical research involving noninvasive designs. Comparatively lower levels of interest in MRP among non‐Hispanic blacks and those with less education raise concerns about disparities in future study enrollment.en_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherClinical Trial Behavioren_US
dc.subject.otherMental Healthen_US
dc.subject.otherNutritionen_US
dc.subject.otherVolunteeren_US
dc.subject.otherResearch Participationen_US
dc.subject.otherNon‐Hispanic Blacken_US
dc.subject.otherHispanicen_US
dc.subject.otherDrugsen_US
dc.subject.otherDevicesen_US
dc.subject.otherVaccinesen_US
dc.titlePublic Interest in Medical Research Participation: Differences by Volunteer Status and Study Typeen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPharmacy and Pharmacologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/106963/1/cts12142.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/cts.12142en_US
dc.identifier.sourceClinical and Translational Scienceen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDempsey AF, Singer D, Clark SJ, Davis MM. Parents’ views on 3 shot‐related visits: implications for use of adolescent vaccines like human papillomavirus vaccine. Acad Pediatr. 2009; 9 ( 5 ): 348 – 352.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCorbie‐Smith G, Thomas SB, Williams MV, Moody‐Ayers S. Attitudes and beliefs of African Americans toward participation in medical research. J Gen Intern Med. 1999; 14 ( 9 ): 537 – 546.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCorbie‐Smith G, Thomas SB, St George DMM. Distrust, race, and research. Arch Intern Med. 2002; 162 ( 21 ): 2458 – 2463.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOdulana A, Kim MM, Green M, Taylor Y, Howard DL, Godley P, Corbie‐Smith G. Participating in research: attitudes within the African American Church. J Relig Health. 2012; Aug 11 [Epub ahead of print].en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDurant RW, Davis RB, St George DMM, Williams IC, Blumenthal C, Corbie‐Smith GM. Participation in research studies: factors associated with failing to meet minority recruitment goals. Ann Epidemiol. 2007; 17 ( 8 ): 634 – 642.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoberson NL. Clinical trial participation. Viewpoints from racial/ethnic groups. Cancer. 1994; 74 ( 9 Suppl ): 2687 – 2691.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePayne JK, Hendrix CC. Clinical trial recruitment challenges with older adults with cancer. Appl Nurs Res. 2010; 23 ( 4 ): 233 – 237.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZúñiga ML, Blanco E, Martínez P, Strathdee SA, Gifford AL. Perceptions of barriers and facilitators to participation in clinical trials in HIV‐positive Latinas: a pilot study. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2007; 16 ( 9 ): 1322 – 1330.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSheppard VB, Cox LS, Kanamori MJ, Cañar J, Rodríguez Y, Goodman M, Pomeroy J, Mandelblatt J, Huerta EE; Latin American Cancer Research Coalition (LACRC). Brief report: if you build it, they will come: methods for recruiting Latinos into cancer research. J Gen Intern Med. 2005; 20 ( 5 ): 444 – 447.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFord JG, Howerton MW, Lai GY, Gary TL, Bolen S, Gibbons MC, Tilburt J, Baffi C, Tanpitukpongse TP, Wilson RF, et al. Barriers to recruiting underrepresented populations to cancer clinical trials: a systematic review. Cancer. 2008; 112 ( 2 ): 228 – 242.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeiat A, Gross CP, Krumholz HM. Representation of the elderly, women, and minorities in heart failure clinical trials. Arch Intern Med. 2002; 162 ( 15 ): 1682 – 1688.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMurthy VH, Krumholz HM, Gross CP. Participation in cancer clinical trials: race‐, sex‐, and age‐based disparities. JAMA. 2004; 291 ( 22 ): 2720 – 2726.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSengupta S, Strauss RP, DeVellis R, Quinn SC, DeVellis B, Ware WB. Factors affecting African‐American participation in AIDS research. J Acq Immun Def Synd. 2000; 24 ( 3 ): 275 – 284.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYancey AK, Ortega AN, Kumanyika SK. Effective recruitment and retention of minority research participants. Annu Rev Publ Health. 2006; 27: 1 – 28.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGwadz MV, Colon P, Ritchie AS, Leonard NR, Cleland CM, Riedel M, Bowens D, Banfield AD, Change P, Quiles R, et al. Increasing and supporting the participation of persons of color living with HIV/AIDS in AIDS clinical trials. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2010; 7 ( 4 ): 194 – 200.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDennis J. Knowledge Panel Design Summary. 2011. Available at: http://www.knowledgenetworks.com/knpanel/docs/KnowledgePanel(R)‐Design‐Summary‐Description.pdf. Accessed February 4, 2013.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWoolford SJ, Clark SJ, Gebremariam A, Davis MM, Freed GL. To cut or not to cut: physicians’ perspectives on referring adolescents for bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2010; 20 ( 7 ): 937 – 942.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTarini BA, Goldenberg A, Singer D, Clark SJ, Butchart A, Davis MM. Not without my permission: parents’ willingness to permit use of newborn screening samples for research. Public Health Genomics. 2010; 13 ( 3 ): 125 – 130.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMacy ML, Clark SJ, Freed GL, Butchart AT, Singer DC, Sasson C, Meurer WJ, Davis MM. Carpooling and booster seats: a national survey of parents. Pediatrics. 2012; 129 ( 2 ): 290 – 298.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEisenberg D, Freed GL, Davis MM, Singer D, Prosser LA. Valuing health at different ages: evidence from a nationally representative survey in the US. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2011; 9 ( 3 ): 149 – 156.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGul RB, Ali PA. Clinical trials: the challenge of recruitment and retention of participants. J Clin Nurs. 2010; 19 ( 1–2 ): 227 – 233.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCottler LB, McCloskey DJ, Aguilar‐Gaxiola S, Bennett NM, Strelnick H, Dwyer‐White M, Collyar SA, Seifer SD, O'Leary CC, Striley CW, et al. Community needs, concerns, and perceptions about health research: findings from the clinical and translational science award sentinel network. Am J Public Health. 2013; 13 (9): 1685 – 1692.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBraunstein JB, Sherber NS, Schulman SP, Ding EL, Powe NR. Race, medical researcher distrust, perceived harm, and willingness to participate in cardiovascular prevention trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2008; 87 ( 1 ): 1 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrandt AM. Racism and research: the case of the Tuskegee syphilis study. Hastings Cent Rep. 1978; 8 ( 6 ): 21 – 29.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKatz RV, Green BL, Kressin NR, Kegeles SS, Wang MQ, James SA, Russell SL, Claudio C, McCallum JM. The legacy of the Tuskegee syphilis study: assessing its impact on willingness to participate in biomedical studies. J Health Care Poor U. 2008; 19 ( 4 ): 1168 – 1180.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDearing BA, Chhibber R, Katz RV. Trust in medical researchers and research findings by race/ethnicity. J Dent Res 2009 (Spec Iss A) Abstract #647.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDavis MM, Clark SJ, Butchart AT, Singer DC, Shanley TP, Gipson DS. Public participation in, and awareness about, medical research opportunities in the era of clinical and translational research. Clin Transl Sci. 2013; 6 ( 2 ): 88 – 93.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThe Clinical Trials Enterprise in the United States: A Call for Disruptive Innovation – Institute of Medicine. Available at: http://www.iom.edu/Global/Perspectives/2012/CallforCTE.aspx?page=8. Accessed January 31, 2013.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Healthcare Disparities Report, 2011. April 2012. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. Available at: http://www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/nhqrdr/nhdr11/index.html. Accessed May 22, 2013.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCenters for Disease Control and Prevention. Health Disparities and Inequalities Report—United States. MMWR. 2011; 60 (Suppl): 1 – 116.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMastroianni AC, Faden R, Federman D. Women and health research: a report from the Institute of Medicine. Kennedy Inst Ethic J. 1994; 4 ( 1 ): 55 – 62.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.