Show simple item record

The Self in the Song: Identity and Authority in Contemporary American Poetry.

dc.contributor.authorLucas, David Williamen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-13T18:20:35Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONen_US
dc.date.available2014-10-13T18:20:35Z
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.date.submitted2014en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/108995
dc.description.abstractProvocative recent scholarship has sought to revise, historicize, and challenge a commonplace of reading lyric: the illusion of personal encounter in the language of a poem. The work of lyric theorists has enriched and complicated potential answers to a persistent question: what do we encounter when we read a poem? In The Self in the Song, I argue that the work of Adrienne Rich, Mark Strand, Derek Walcott, and Charles Wright articulates similar questions and offers complex and resonant responses. I demonstrate the remarkable skepticism with which they portray the self, as an idea with political, philosophical, geographic, and theological implications. In poems that enact and foreground their own poetics, they enact complex theoretical concerns about the artificiality of the speaking “I” and the belatedness of the self with regard to language. Moreover, I read their poetry as heralding and exemplifying the emergence of our complex contemporary poetics from an historical moment in the 1970s and 1980s when the work of poststructuralist theorists and practicing poets came into productive conversation, often centered around the question of the apparition of the self in literary language and its philosophical and political implications. The lasting influence of that contact demonstrates that the opposition of “experimentation” to “tradition,” as articulated by the Language Poets and other historical poetic avant-gardes, is another false binary among many that have oversimplified the multifaceted history of American poetry. Although the four poets I consider have received varying degrees of scholarly attention, they are almost unanimously considered exemplars of what Charles Bernstein has dismissively called “official verse culture,” both in the praise of its cultural arbiters and in the oppositional avant-garde critique of that culture. I read their work in and against these contexts, also using my reconsideration of their poetry as an opportunity to call for a fresh approach to the complexity of the illusion of personal encounter in the lyric poem, for new avenues to perceive the variety of writing and thinking across the spectrum of poetic practice in the United States, especially as we seek to understand what we mean by authority and identity in poetry.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectAmerican Poetry--20th Century--History and Criticismen_US
dc.subjectLyric Poetry--History and Criticismen_US
dc.subjectSelf in Literatureen_US
dc.subjectPoeticsen_US
dc.titleThe Self in the Song: Identity and Authority in Contemporary American Poetry.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineEnglish Language & Literatureen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberGregerson, Linda K.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberPrins, Yopieen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberWhittier-Ferguson, John A.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberWhite, Gillian Cahillen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEnglish Language and Literatureen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHumanitiesen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/108995/1/dwlucas_1.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.