No more ‘business as usual’ with audit and feedback interventions: towards an agenda for a reinvigorated intervention
dc.contributor.author | Ivers, Noah M | |
dc.contributor.author | Sales, Anne | |
dc.contributor.author | Colquhoun, Heather | |
dc.contributor.author | Michie, Susan | |
dc.contributor.author | Foy, Robbie | |
dc.contributor.author | Francis, Jill J | |
dc.contributor.author | Grimshaw, Jeremy M | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-12-08T17:46:15Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-12-08T17:46:15Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014-01-17 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Implementation Science. 2014 Jan 17;9(1):14 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/109500 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Abstract Background Audit and feedback interventions in healthcare have been found to be effective, but there has been little progress with respect to understanding their mechanisms of action or identifying their key ‘active ingredients.’ Discussion Given the increasing use of audit and feedback to improve quality of care, it is imperative to focus further research on understanding how and when it works best. In this paper, we argue that continuing the ‘business as usual’ approach to evaluating two-arm trials of audit and feedback interventions against usual care for common problems and settings is unlikely to contribute new generalizable findings. Future audit and feedback trials should incorporate evidence- and theory-based best practices, and address known gaps in the literature. Summary We offer an agenda for high-priority research topics for implementation researchers that focuses on reviewing best practices for designing audit and feedback interventions to optimize effectiveness. | |
dc.title | No more ‘business as usual’ with audit and feedback interventions: towards an agenda for a reinvigorated intervention | |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/109500/1/13012_2013_Article_727.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1186/1748-5908-9-14 | en_US |
dc.language.rfc3066 | en | |
dc.rights.holder | Ivers et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. | |
dc.date.updated | 2014-12-08T17:46:15Z | |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.