Show simple item record

Comatulid Crinoids in the Fossil Record: Methods and Results for the Extremely Imperfect.

dc.contributor.authorPurens, Kristopher J. S.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-01-30T20:11:43Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONen_US
dc.date.available2015-01-30T20:11:43Z
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.date.submitted2014en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/110401
dc.description.abstractPaleontologists' attempts to understand patterns of evolutionary change have always been influenced by biases in both the fossil record and collection/description. This dissertation has two basic goals: to better understand biases, and to better understand patterns of evolutionary change. Comatulid crinoids, the most abundant modern crinoids, have a depauperate described fossil record, with an order of magnitude lower generic diversity reported from any stage than that described from the modern ocean. Two methods are used to address potential bias in the described record: morphological analysis of comatulid centrodorsals to test the role of differential material for modern and paleontological taxonomic descriptions, and a capture-mark-recapture (CMR) method to understand regional and temporal difference in detection rate. To address patterns of morphological change, we examine the disparity of comatulid centrodorsals, both within species, and for the whole group through geologic time. Investigation of intraspecific variation of comatulid centrodorsals finds no evidence of lumping bias in fossil taxonomic descriptions. However, analysis using CMR found substantial differences in detection rate both regionally and temporally. Extremely low detection rates, especially in the non-European Cenozoic, mean that there are substantial biases that hide a significant increase in comatulid diversity over the Cenozoic. Collection efforts should be undertaken to better understand whether the bias is in the fossil record, or in efforts to collect and describe comatulid material from the Cenozoic. Previous efforts to describe the pattern of morphological change in crinoids have shown a pattern of rapid expansion into morphospace followed by stasis. Such a pattern can be explained by a decrease in rates of evolution, or as constraints preventing further dispersion into morphospace. These explanations have differing signatures on subclade disparity and homoplasy. A lowering rate of change scenario should mean homoplasy is rare and subclade disparity to be low, while the constraints scenario should result in homoplasy being more common and subclade disparity being high. We found evidence for common homoplasy and high subclade disparity for the comatulids. This supports constraints as the explanation for the pattern of early expansion into morphospace followed by stasis.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectfossil recorden_US
dc.subjectmorphological disparityen_US
dc.subjectcomatulid crinoidsen_US
dc.subjectgeometric morphometricsen_US
dc.subjectcapture mark recaptureen_US
dc.titleComatulid Crinoids in the Fossil Record: Methods and Results for the Extremely Imperfect.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineGeologyen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberBaumiller, Tomasz K.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberSmith, Gerald Rayen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberWilson, Jeffrey A.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberZelditch, Miriam L.en_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelGeology and Earth Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/110401/1/kjrhodes_1.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.