View Item 

Show simple item record

Urinary Catheters: What Type Do Men and Their Nurses Prefer?

dc.contributor.authorSaint, Sanjayen_US
dc.contributor.authorLipsky, Benjamin A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBaker, Paul D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMcDonald, Linda L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorOssenkop, Kathleenen_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-04T20:35:39Z
dc.date.available2015-05-04T20:35:39Z
dc.date.issued1999-12en_US
dc.identifier.citationSaint, Sanjay; Lipsky, Benjamin A.; Baker, Paul D.; McDonald, Linda L.; Ossenkop, Kathleen (1999). "Urinary Catheters: What Type Do Men and Their Nurses Prefer?." Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 47(12).en_US
dc.identifier.issn0002-8614en_US
dc.identifier.issn1532-5415en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/111067
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherincontinenceen_US
dc.subject.othercomforten_US
dc.subject.otherurinary tract infectionen_US
dc.subject.othercondom catheteren_US
dc.subject.otherurinary catheteren_US
dc.titleUrinary Catheters: What Type Do Men and Their Nurses Prefer?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelGeriatricsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Medicine, University of Michigan Health Systemen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherVeterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care Systemen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherHealth Services Research and Development, Ann Arbor Veterans Affairs Medical Center.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicineen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/111067/1/j.1532-5415.1999.tb01567.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1532-5415.1999.tb01567.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of the American Geriatrics Societyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceArmstrong EP, Ferguson TA. Urinary incontinence: Healthcare resource consumption in veterans affairs medical centers. Veterans Health Syst J 1998;October: 37 – 42.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWarren JW. Catheter‐associated urinary tract infections. Infect Dis Clin North Am 1997; 11: 609 – 622.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSaint S.. The clinical and economic consequences of nosocomial catheter‐related bacteriuria. Am J Infect Control, in press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZimakoff J., Stickler DJ, Pontoppidan B., Larsen SO. Bladder management and urinary tract infections in Danish hospitals, nursing homes, and home care: A national prevalence study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1996; 17: 215 – 221.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWarren JW. Urethral catheters, condom catheters, and nosocomial urinary tract infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1996; 17: 221 – 214.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStamm WE. Catheter‐associated urinary tract infections: Epidemiology, pathogenesis, and prevention. Am J Med 1991; 91: 65 – 71S.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOuslander JG, Greengold B., Chen S.. Complications of chronic indwelling urinary catheters among male nursing home patients: A prospective study. J Urol 1987; 138: 1191 – 5.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOuslander JG, Greengold B., Chen S.. External catheter use and urinary tract infections among incontinent male nursing home patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 1987; 35: 1063 – 1070.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKunin CM. Can we build a better urinary catheter? (editorial). N Engl J Med 1988; 319: 365 – 366.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoe BH, Reid FJ, Brocklehurst JC. Comparison of four urine drainage systems. J Adv Nurs 1988; 13: 374 – 382.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoe BH, Brocklehurst JC. Study of patients with indwelling catheters. J Adv Nurs 1987; 12: 713 – 18.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcMurdo ME, Davey PG, Elder MA et al. A cost‐effectiveness study of the management of intractable urinary incontinence by urinary catheterisation or incontinence pads. J Epidemiol Community Health 1992; 46: 222 – 226.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWarren JW, Steinberg L., Hebel JR, Tenney JH. The prevalence of urethral catheterization in Maryland nursing homes. Arch Intern Med 1989; 149: 1535 – 1537.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrandeis GH, Baumann MM, Hossain M. et al. The prevalence of potentially remediable urinary incontinence in frail older people: A study using the Minimum Data Set. J Am Geriatr Soc 1997; 45: 179 – 184.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOuslander JG, Fowler E.. Management of urinary incontinence in Veterans Administration nursing homes. J Am Geriatr Soc 1985; 33: 33 – 40.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHaley RW, Hooton TM, Culver DH et al. Nosocomial infections in U.S. hospitals, 1975–1976: Estimated frequency by selected characteristics of patients. Am J Med 1981; 70: 947 – 959.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHartstein AI, Garber SB, Ward TT et al. Nosocomial urinary tract infection: A prospective evaluation of 108 catheterized patients. Infect Control 1981; 2: 380 – 386.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJain P., Parada JP, David A., Smith LG. Overuse of the indwelling urinary tract catheter in hospitalized medical patients. Arch Intern Med 1995; 155: 1425 – 1429.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSaint S., Lipsky BA. Preventing catheter‐related bacteriuria: Can we? Should we? How? Arch Intern Med 1999; 159: 800 – 808.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHirsh DD, Fainstein V., Musher DM. Do condom catheter collecting systems cause urinary tract infection? JAMA 1979; 242: 340 – 341.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.1532-5415.1999.tb01567.x.pdf
Size:
525.2KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.