Show simple item record

Physician and patient attitudes towards complementary and alternative medicine in obstetrics and gynecology

dc.contributor.authorFurlow, Mandi L
dc.contributor.authorPatel, Divya A
dc.contributor.authorSen, Ananda
dc.contributor.authorRebecca Liu, J
dc.date.accessioned2015-08-07T17:32:25Z
dc.date.available2015-08-07T17:32:25Z
dc.date.issued2008-06-26
dc.identifier.citationBMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2008 Jun 26;8(1):35
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/112512en_US
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background In the U.S., complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use is most prevalent among reproductive age, educated women. We sought to determine general attitudes and approaches to CAM among obstetric and gynecology patients and physicians. Methods Obstetrician-gynecologist members of the American Medical Association in the state of Michigan and obstetric-gynecology patients at the University of Michigan were surveyed. Physician and patient attitudes and practices regarding CAM were characterized. Results Surveys were obtained from 401 physicians and 483 patients. Physicians appeared to have a more positive attitude towards CAM as compared to patients, and most reported routinely endorsing, providing or referring patients for at least one CAM modality. The most commonly used CAM interventions by patients were divergent from those rated highest among physicians, and most patients did not consult with a health care provider prior to starting CAM. Conclusion Although obstetrics/gynecology physicians and patients have a positive attitude towards CAM, physician and patients' view of the most effective CAM therapies were incongruent. Obstetrician/gynecologists should routinely ask their patients about their use of CAM with the goal of providing responsible, evidence-based advice to optimize patient care.
dc.titlePhysician and patient attitudes towards complementary and alternative medicine in obstetrics and gynecology
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/112512/1/12906_2008_Article_194.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1472-6882-8-35en_US
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderFurlow et al.
dc.date.updated2015-08-07T17:32:25Z
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.