View Item 

Show simple item record

2015 Gout Classification Criteria: An American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism Collaborative Initiative

dc.contributor.authorNeogi, Tuhinaen_US
dc.contributor.authorJansen, Tim L. Th. A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDalbeth, Nicolaen_US
dc.contributor.authorFransen, Jaapen_US
dc.contributor.authorSchumacher, H. Ralphen_US
dc.contributor.authorBerendsen, Dianneen_US
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Melanieen_US
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Hyonen_US
dc.contributor.authorEdwards, N. Lawrenceen_US
dc.contributor.authorJanssens, Hein J. E. M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLioté, Frédéricen_US
dc.contributor.authorNaden, Raymond P.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNuki, Georgeen_US
dc.contributor.authorOgdie, Alexisen_US
dc.contributor.authorPerez‐ruiz, Fernandoen_US
dc.contributor.authorSaag, Kennethen_US
dc.contributor.authorSingh, Jasvinder A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSundy, John S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorTausche, Anne‐kathrinen_US
dc.contributor.authorVaquez‐mellado, Janitziaen_US
dc.contributor.authorYarows, Steven A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, William J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-10-07T20:42:29Z
dc.date.available2016-12-01T14:33:06Zen
dc.date.issued2015-10en_US
dc.identifier.citationNeogi, Tuhina; Jansen, Tim L. Th. A.; Dalbeth, Nicola; Fransen, Jaap; Schumacher, H. Ralph; Berendsen, Dianne; Brown, Melanie; Choi, Hyon; Edwards, N. Lawrence; Janssens, Hein J. E. M.; Lioté, Frédéric ; Naden, Raymond P.; Nuki, George; Ogdie, Alexis; Perez‐ruiz, Fernando ; Saag, Kenneth; Singh, Jasvinder A.; Sundy, John S.; Tausche, Anne‐kathrin ; Vaquez‐mellado, Janitzia ; Yarows, Steven A.; Taylor, William J. (2015). "2015 Gout Classification Criteria: An American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism Collaborative Initiative." Arthritis & Rheumatology 67(10): 2557-2568.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2326-5191en_US
dc.identifier.issn2326-5205en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/113687
dc.publisherBlackwell Scientificen_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.title2015 Gout Classification Criteria: An American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism Collaborative Initiativeen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelRheumatologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/113687/1/art39254.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/art.39254en_US
dc.identifier.sourceArthritis & Rheumatologyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOgdie A, Taylor WJ, Weatherall M, Fransen J, Jansen TL, Neogi T, et al. Imaging modalities for the classification of gout: systematic literature review and meta‐analysis. Ann Rheum Dis 2014. E‐pub ahead of print.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZhu Y, Pandya BJ, Choi HK. Prevalence of gout and hyperuricemia in the US general population: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2007–2008. Arthritis Rheum 2011; 63: 3136 – 41.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRichette P, Clerson P, Bouee S, Chales G, Doherty M, Flipo RM, et al. Identification of patients with gout: elaboration of a questionnaire for epidemiological studies. Ann Rheum Dis 2014. E‐pub ahead of print.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBardin T, Bouee S, Clerson P, Chales G, Doherty M, Flipo RM, et al. Prevalence of gout in the adult population of France in 2013 [abstract]. Ann Rheum Dis 2014; 73 Suppl 2: 787 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnnemans L, Spaepen E, Gaskin M, Bonnemaire M, Malier V, Gilbert T, et al. Gout in the UK and Germany: prevalence, comorbidities and management in general practice 2000‐2005. Ann Rheum Dis 2008; 67: 960 – 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKuo CF, Grainge MJ, Mallen C, Zhang W, Doherty M. Rising burden of gout in the UK but continuing suboptimal management: a nationwide population study. Ann Rheum Dis 2015; 74: 661 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMikuls TR, Farrar JT, Bilker WB, Fernandes S, Schumacher HR Jr, Saag KG. Gout epidemiology: results from the UK General Practice Research Database, 1990‐1999. Ann Rheum Dis 2005; 64: 267 – 72.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWinnard D, Wright C, Jackson G, Gow P, Kerr A, McLachlan A, et al. Gout, diabetes and cardiovascular disease in the Aotearoa New Zealand adult population: co‐prevalence and implications for clinical practice. N Z Med J 2013; 126: 53 – 64.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNeogi T. Gout. N Engl J Med 2011; 364: 443 – 52.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJohnson SR, Goek ON, Singh‐Grewal D, Vlad SC, Feldman BM, Felton DT, et al. Classification criteria in rheumatic diseases: a review of methodologic properties. Arthritis Rheum 2007; 57: 1119 – 33.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWallace SL, Robinson H, Masi AT, Decker JL, McCarty DJ, Yu TF. Preliminary criteria for the classification of the acute arthritis of primary gout. Arthritis Rheum 1977; 20: 895 – 900.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJanssens HJ, Fransen J, van de Lisdonk EH, van Riel PL, van Weel C, Janssen M. A diagnostic rule for acute gouty arthritis in primary care without joint fluid analysis. Arch Intern Med 2010; 170: 1120 – 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePelaez‐Ballestas I, Hernandez Cuevas C, Burgos‐Vargas R, Hernandez Roque L, Teran L, Espinoza J, et al. Diagnosis of chronic gout: evaluating the American College of Rheumatology proposal, European League Against Rheumatism recommendations, and clinical judgment. J Rheumatol 2010; 37: 1743 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKellgren JH, Jeffrey MR, Ball J. The epidemiology of chronic rheumatism. Vol. I. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific; 1963. p. 326 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDecker JL. Report from the subcommittee on diagnostic criteria for gout. In: Bennett PH, Wood PH, editors. Proceedings from the Third International Symposium; 1966 June 5‐10; New York, New York. Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica Foundation; 1968: 385 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTaylor WJ, Fransen J, Dalbeth N, Neogi T, Schumacher HR, Brown M, et al. Performance of classification criteria for gout in early and established disease. Ann Rheum Dis 2014. E‐pub ahead of print.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMalik A, Schumacher HR, Dinnella JE, Clayburne GM. Clinical diagnostic criteria for gout: comparison with the gold standard of synovial fluid crystal analysis. J Clin Rheumatol 2009; 15: 22 – 4.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarrold LR, Mazor KM, Negron A, Ogarek J, Firneno C, Yood RA. Primary care providers’ knowledge, beliefs and treatment practices for gout: results of a physician questionnaire. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2013; 52: 1623 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePal B, Foxall M, Dysart T, Carey F, Whittaker M. How is gout managed in primary care? A review of current practice and proposed guidelines. Clin Rheumatol 2000; 19: 21 – 5.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDalbeth N, Fransen J, Jansen TL, Neogi T, Schumacher HR, Taylor WJ. New classification criteria for gout: a framework for progress. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2013; 52: 1748 – 53.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceProwse RL, Dalbeth N, Kavanaugh A, Adebajo AO, Gaffo AL, Terkeltaub R, et al. A Delphi exercise to identify characteristic features of gout—opinions from patients and physicians, the first stage in developing new classification criteria [published erratum appears in J Rheumatol 2013;40:1634]. J Rheumatol 2013; 40: 498 – 505.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTaylor W, Fransen J, Jansen TL, Dalbeth N, Schumacher HR, Brown M, et al. Study for Updated Gout Classification Criteria (SUGAR): identification of features to classify gout. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2015. E‐pub ahead of print.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBerendsen D, Jansen TL, Taylor W, Neogi T, Fransen J, Pascual E, et al. A critical appraisal of the competence of crystal identification by rheumatologists [abstract]. Ann Rheum Dis 2013; 72 Suppl 3: A981 – 2.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ, Funovits J, Felson DT, Bingham CO III, et al. 2010 rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum 2010; 62: 2569 – 81.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ, Funovits J, Felson DT, Bingham CO III, et al. 2010 rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Ann Rheum Dis 2010; 69: 1580 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVan den Hoogen F, Khanna D, Fransen J, Johnson SR, Baron M, Tyndall A, et al. 2013 classification criteria for systemic sclerosis: an American College of Rheumatology/European League against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum 2013; 65: 2737 – 47.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVan den Hoogen F, Khanna D, Fransen J, Johnson SR, Baron M, Tyndall A, et al. 2013 classification criteria for systemic sclerosis: an American college of rheumatology/European league against rheumatism collaborative initiative. Ann Rheum Dis 2013; 72: 1747 – 55.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNeogi T, Aletaha D, Silman AJ, Naden RL, Felson DT, Aggarwal R, et al. The 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis: phase 2 methodological report. Arthritis Rheum 2010; 62: 2582 – 91.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJohnson SR, Naden RP, Fransen J, van den Hoogen F, Pope JE, Baron M, et al. Multicriteria decision analysis methods with 1000Minds for developing systemic sclerosis classification criteria. J Clin Epidemiol 2014; 67: 706 – 14.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHansen P, Ombler F. A new method for scoring additive multi‐attribute value models using pairwise rankings of alternatives. J Multi‐Crit Decis Anal 2008; 15: 87 – 107.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFilippucci E, Di Geso L, Grassi W. Tips and tricks to recognize microcrystalline arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2012; 51 Suppl 7: vii18 – 21.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNaredo E, Uson J, Jimenez‐Palop M, Martinez A, Vicente E, Brito E, et al. Ultrasound‐detected musculoskeletal urate crystal deposition: which joints and what findings should be assessed for diagnosing gout? Ann Rheum Dis 2014; 73: 1522 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGlazebrook KN, Guimaraes LS, Murthy NS, Black DF, Bongartz T, Manek NJ, et al. Identification of intraarticular and periarticular uric acid crystals with dual‐energy CT: initial evaluation. Radiology 2011; 261: 516 – 24.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMallinson PI, Coupal T, Reisinger C, Chou H, Munk PL, Nicolaou S, et al. Artifacts in dual‐energy CT gout protocol: a review of 50 suspected cases with an artifact identification guide. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014; 203: W103 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAggarwal R, Ringold S, Khanna D, Neogi T, Johnson SR, Miller A, et al. Distinctions between diagnostic and classification criteria? Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2015; 67: 891 – 7.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
art39254.pdf
Size:
317.1KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.