Show simple item record

Neoplastic and non‐neoplastic complications of solid organ transplantation in patients with preexisting monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance

dc.contributor.authorGoebel, Teresa E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSchiltz, Nicholas K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWoodside, Kenneth J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorChandran Pillai, Aiswaryaen_US
dc.contributor.authorCaimi, Paolo F.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLazarus, Hillard M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKoroukian, Siran M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCampagnaro, Erica L.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-10-07T20:43:20Z
dc.date.available2016-10-10T14:50:23Zen
dc.date.issued2015-09en_US
dc.identifier.citationGoebel, Teresa E.; Schiltz, Nicholas K.; Woodside, Kenneth J.; Chandran Pillai, Aiswarya; Caimi, Paolo F.; Lazarus, Hillard M.; Koroukian, Siran M.; Campagnaro, Erica L. (2015). "Neoplastic and non‐neoplastic complications of solid organ transplantation in patients with preexisting monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance." Clinical Transplantation 29(9): 851-857.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0902-0063en_US
dc.identifier.issn1399-0012en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/113779
dc.description.abstractMonoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) occurs in 3–7% of the elderly population, with higher prevalence in renal failure patients, and is associated with a 25‐fold increased lifetime risk for plasma cell myeloma (PCM), also known as multiple myeloma. Using the California State Inpatient, Emergency Department, and Ambulatory Surgery Databases components of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP), we sought to determine whether patients with MGUS who undergo solid organ allograft (n = 22 062) are at increased adjusted relative risk (aRR) for hematologic malignancy and other complications. Among solid organ transplant patients, patients with preexisting MGUS had higher aRR of PCM (aRR 19.46; 95% CI 7.05, 53.73; p < 0.001), venous thromboembolic events (aRR 1.66; 95% CI 1.15, 2.41; p = 0.007), and infection (aRR 1.24; 95% CI 1.06, 1.45; p = 0.007). However, when comparing MGUS patients with and without solid organ transplant, there was decreased aRR for PCM with transplant (aRR 0.34; 95% CI 0.13, 0.88; p = 0.027), and increased venous thromboembolic events (aRR 2.33; 95% CI 1.58, 3.44; p < 0.001) and infectious risks (aRR 1.44; 95% CI 1.23, 1.70; p < 0.001). While MGUS increased the risk of PCM overall following solid organ transplantation, there was lower risk of PCM development compared to MGUS patients who did not receive a transplant. MGUS should not preclude solid organ transplant.en_US
dc.publisherAgency for Healthcare Research and Qualityen_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherHealthcare Cost and Utilization Projecten_US
dc.subject.othermonoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significanceen_US
dc.subject.othermultiple myelomaen_US
dc.subject.otherplasma cell myelomaen_US
dc.subject.otherpost‐transplant lymphoproliferative disorderen_US
dc.subject.othersolid organ transplantationen_US
dc.subject.othervenous thromboembolismen_US
dc.titleNeoplastic and non‐neoplastic complications of solid organ transplantation in patients with preexisting monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significanceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/113779/1/ctr12595_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/113779/2/ctr12595.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ctr.12595en_US
dc.identifier.sourceClinical Transplantationen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMassie AB, Kuricka LM, Segev DL. Big data in organ transplantation: registries and administrative claims. Am J Transplant 2014: 14: 1723.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSallah S, Husain A, Wan J, Vos P, Nguyen NP. The risk of venous thromboembolic disease in patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Ann Oncol 2004: 15: 1490.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSrkalovic G, Cameron MG, Rybicki L, Deitcher SR, Kattke‐Marchant K, Hussein MA. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and multiple myeloma are associated with an increased incidence of venothromboembolic disease. Cancer 2004: 101: 558.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKristinsson SY, Fears TR, Gridley G et al. Deep vein thrombosis after monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and multiple myeloma. Blood 2008: 112: 3582.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMuslimani AA, Spiro TP, Chaudhry AA, Taylor HC, Jaiyesimi I, Daw HA. Venous thromboembolism in patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol 2009: 7: 827.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKristinsson SY, Pfeiffer RM, Björkholm M et al. Arterial and venous thrombosis in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and multiple myeloma: a population‐based study. Blood 2010: 115: 4991.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGregersen H, Nørgaard M, Severinsen MT, Engebjerg MC, Jensen P, Sørensen HT. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and risk of venous thromboembolism. Eur J Haematol 2011: 86: 129.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZa T, De Stefano V, Rossi E et al. Arterial and venous thrombosis in patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: incidence and risk factors in a cohort of 1491 patients. Br J Haematol 2013: 160: 673.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKristensson SY, Tang M, Pfeiffer RM et al. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and risk of skeletal fractures; a population‐based study. Blood 2010: 116: 2651.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSoltero L, Carbajal H, Xu J et al. Initial survival data of kidney transplant patients with pre‐transplant monoclonal gammopathy. Clin Transplant 2012: 26: 300.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGiordano M, Santangelo L, Scarasciulli ML et al. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance in pediatric kidney transplantation: a possible role of Epstein‐Barr virus. Pediatr Transplant 2014: 18: 42.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNaina HV, Harris S, Dispenzieri A et al. Long‐term follow‐up of patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance after kidney transplantation. Am J Nephrol 2012: 35: 365.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHCUP Central Distributor SID Availability of Data Elements – 2009. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2010. www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/state/siddist/siddistvarnote2009.jsp (accessed July 3, 2015).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZou G. A modified Poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data. Am J Epidemiol 2004: 159: 702.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAustin PC. An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behav Res 2011: 46: 399.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 1983: 70: 41.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceElixhauser A, Steiner C, Harris DR, Coffey RM. Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Med Care 1998: 36: 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKasiske BL, Kukla A, Thomas D et al. Lymphoproliferative disorders after adult kidney transplant: epidemiology and comparison of registry report with claims‐based diagnoses. Am J Kidney Dis 2011: 58: 971.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSafadi S, Dispenzieri A, Amer H et al. Multiple myeloma after kidney transplantation. Clin Transplant 2015: 29: 76.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJimenez‐Zepeda VH, Heilman RL, Engel RA et al. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance does not affect outcomes in patients undergoing solid organ transplants. Transplantation 2011: 92: 570.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRostaing L, Modesto A, Abbal M, Durand D. Long‐term follow up of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance in transplant patients. Am J Nephrol 1994: 14: 187.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGalioto A, Morando F, Rosi S et al. Monoclonal gammopathy after liver transplantation: a risk factor for long‐term medical complications other than malignancies. Transpl Int 2012: 25: 25.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrown LM, Gridley G, Check D, Landgren O. Risk of multiple myeloma and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance among white and black United States veterans with prior autoimmune, infectious, inflammatory, and allergic disorders. Blood 2008: 111: 3388.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGale RP, Eapen M, Logan B, Zhang M‐J, Lazarus HM. Are there roles for observational database studies and structured quantification of expert opinion to answer therapy controversies in transplants? Bone Marrow Transplant 2009: 43: 435.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGale RP, Lazarus HM. How helpful are meta‐analyses in determining the best therapy of blood diseases? Acta Haematol 2011: 125: 91.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRajkumar SV, Kyle RA, Therneau TM et al. Serum free light chain ratio is an independent risk factor for progression in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Blood 2005: 106: 812.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLeung N, Bridoux F, Hutchinson CA et al. Monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance: when MGUS is no longer undetermined or insignificant. Blood 2012: 120: 4292.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. SEER hematopoietic and lymphoid neoplasm database. URL: seer.cancer.gov/seertools/hemelymph (accessed April 22, 2015).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCenters for Medicare & Medicaid Services. ICD‐9‐CM diagnosis and procedure codes: abbreviated and full code titles. URL: www.cms.gov/Medicare/Coding/ICD9ProviderDiagnosisCodes/codes.html (accessed April 22, 2015).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKyle RA, Therneau TM, Rajkumar SV et al. Prevalence of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. N Engl J Med 2006: 354: 1362.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWeiss BM, Abadie J, Verma P, Howard RS, Kuehl WM. A monoclonal gammopathy precedes multiple myeloma in most patients. Blood 2009: 113: 5418.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKyle RA, Therneau TM, Rajkumar SV et al. A long‐term study of prognosis in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. N Engl J Med 2002: 346: 564.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKyle RA, Rajkumar SV. Monoclonal gammopathies of undetermined significance: a review. Immunol Rev 2003: 194: 112.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBida JP, Kyle RA, Therneau TM et al. Disease associations with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: a population‐based study of 17 398 patients. Mayo Clin Proc 2009: 84: 685.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKristinsson SY, Bjorkhom M, Andersson TM et al. Patterns of survival and causes of death following a diagnosis of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: a population‐based study. Haematologica 2009: 94: 1714.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.