View Item 

Show simple item record

The Growth–Defense Trade‐Off And Habitat Specialization By Plants In Amazonian Forests

dc.contributor.authorFine, Paul V. A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMiller, Zachariah J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMesones, Italoen_US
dc.contributor.authorIrazuzta, Sebastianen_US
dc.contributor.authorAppel, Heidi M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorStevens, M. Henry H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSääksjärvi, Ilarien_US
dc.contributor.authorSchultz, Jack C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorColey, Phyllis D.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-01T18:49:57Z
dc.date.available2016-02-01T18:49:57Z
dc.date.issued2006-07en_US
dc.identifier.citationFine, Paul V. A.; Miller, Zachariah J.; Mesones, Italo; Irazuzta, Sebastian; Appel, Heidi M.; Stevens, M. Henry H.; Sääksjärvi, Ilari ; Schultz, Jack C.; Coley, Phyllis D. (2006). "The Growth–Defense Trade‐Off And Habitat Specialization By Plants In Amazonian Forests." Ecology 87(sp7): S150-S162.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0012-9658en_US
dc.identifier.issn1939-9170en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/117169
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.publisherEcological Society of Americaen_US
dc.subject.othertropical treesen_US
dc.subject.otherAmazonen_US
dc.subject.otherecological gradienten_US
dc.subject.othergrowth–defense trade-offen_US
dc.subject.otherhabitat specializationen_US
dc.subject.otherherbivoryen_US
dc.subject.otherphenolicsen_US
dc.subject.otherphylogenetic controlen_US
dc.subject.otherrainforesten_US
dc.subject.otherreciprocal-transplant experimenten_US
dc.subject.otherterpenesen_US
dc.titleThe Growth–Defense Trade‐Off And Habitat Specialization By Plants In Amazonian Forestsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1048 USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Botany, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio 45056 USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherEnvironmental and Conservation Programs and Department of Botany, Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, Illinois 60605 USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherZoological Museum, Centre for Biodiversity, FIN-20014, University of Turku, Finlanden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherPesticide Research Laboratory, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802 USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario L8S4K1 Canadaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Forestry, Universidad Nacional de la Amazonía Peruana, Plaza Serafín Filomeno 246, Iquitos, Peruen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/117169/1/ecy200687sp7s150.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[150:TGTAHS]2.0.CO;2en_US
dc.identifier.sourceEcologyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLim, W. and I. Turner. 1996. Resource availability and growth responses to defoliation in seedlings of three early-successional, tropical, woody species. Ecological Research 11: S321 – S324.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFine, P. V A., D. Daly, G. Villa, I. Mesones, and K. Cameron. 2005. The contribution of edaphic heterogeneity to the evolution and diversity of Burseraceae trees in the western Amazon. Evolution 59: S1464 – S1478.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFine, P. V A., I. Mesones, and P. D. Coley. 2004. Herbivores promote habitat specialization by trees in Amazonian forests. Science 305: S663 – S665.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGarcía, R., M. Ahuite, and M. Olórtegui. 2003. Clasificación de bosques sobre arena blanca de la zona reservada Allpahuayo-Mishana. Folia Amazónica 14: S17 – S26.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGentry, A. H.. 1986. Endemism in tropical versus temperate plant communities. Pages. S153 – S181. in M. E. Soulé, editor. Conservation biology: the science of scarcity and diversity Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGershenzon, J. and R. Croteau. 1991. Terpenoids. Pages. S165 – S219. in G. A. Rosenthal and M. R. Berenbaum, editors. Herbivores, their interactions with secondary metabolites. Volume 1. The chemical participants Academic Press, New York, New York, USA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrover, J. P. and R. D. Holt. 1998. Disentangling resource and apparent competition: realistic models for plant–herbivore communities. Journal of Theoretical Biology 19: S353 – S376.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrubb, P. J.. 1986. Sclerophylls, pachyphylls, and pycnophylls: the nature and significance of hard leaf surfaces. Pages. S137 – S150. in B. Juniper and T. Southwood, editors. Insects and the plant surface Edward Arnold, London, UK.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHagerman, A. E. and K. M. Klucher. 1986. Tannin–protein interactions. Pages. S67 – S76. in V. Cody, E. Middleton, and J. Harborne, editors. Plant flavonoids in biology and medicine: biochemical, pharmacological and structure activity relationships Alan R. Liss, New York, New York, USA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarborne, J. B.. 1991. Recent advances in the ecological chemistry of plant terpenoids. Pages. S399 – S426. in J. B. Harborne and F. A. Tomes-Barberan, editors. Ecological chemistry and biochemistry of plant terpenoids Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarley, C. D G.. 2003. Abiotic stress and herbivory interact to set range limits across a two-dimensional stress gradient. Ecology 84: S1477 – S1488.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarvey, P. H. and M. D. Pagel. 1991. The comparative method in evolutionary biology Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHerms, D. A. and W. J. Mattson. 1992. The dilemma of plants: to grow or defend. Quarterly Review of Biology 67: S283 – S335.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJanzen, D. H.. 1974. Tropical blackwater rivers, animals, and mast fruiting by the Dipterocarpaceae. Biotropica 6: S69 – S103.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJørgensen, P. and S. Léon-Yánez. 1999. Catalogue of the vascular plants of Ecuador Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKauffman, S., G. Paredes Arce, and R. Marquina. 1998. Suelos de la zona de Iquitos. Pages. S139 – S230. in R. Kalliola and S. Flores Paitán, editors. Geoecologia y desarrollo Amazonico: estudio integrado en la zona de Iquitos, Peru University of Turku Press, Turku, Finland.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKoricheva, J., H. Nykanen, and E. Gianoli. 2004. Meta analysis of trade-offs among plant antiherbivore defenses: Are plants jacks-of-all-trades, masters of all? American Naturalist 163: SE64 – SE75.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLangenheim, J.. 1994. Higher plant terpenoids: a phytocentric overview of their ecological roles. Journal of Chemical Ecology 20: S1223 – S1280.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLerdau, M. T. and J. Penuelas. 1993. Terpenes in plants: links between the biosphere and the atmosphere. Mundo Cientifico 13: S60 – S64.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLouda, S. M.. 1982. Distribution ecology: variation in plant recruitment over a gradient in relation to insect seed predation. Ecological Monographs 52: S25 – S41.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLouda, S. M.. 1983. Seed predation and seedling mortality in the recruitment of a shrub Haplopappus venetus (Asteraceae), along a climatic gradient. Ecology 64: S511 – S521.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLouda, S. M., K. H. Keeler, and R. D. Holt. 1990. Herbivore influences on plant performance and competitive interactions. Pages. S413 – S444. in J. Grace and D. Tilman, editors. Perspectives in plant competition Academic Press, New York, New York, USA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLouda, S. M. and J. Rodman. 1996. Insect herbivory as a major factor in the shade distribution of a native crucifer ( Cardamine cordifolia A. Gray, bittercress). Journal of Ecology 84: S229 – S237.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMabry, T. J. and J. E. Gill. 1979. Sesquiterpene lactones and other terpenoids. Pages. S502 – S538. in G. Rosenthal and D. H. Janzen, editors. Herbivores: their interaction with secondary plant metabolites Academic Press, New York, New York, USA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarengo, J.. 1998. Climatologia de la zona de Iquitos, Peru. Pages. S35 – S57. in R. Kalliola and S. Flores Paitán, editors. Geoecologia y desarrollo Amazonico: estudio integrado en la zona de Iquitos, Peru University of Turku Press, Turku, Finland.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMedina, E. and E. Cuevas. 1989. Patterns of nutrient accumulation and release in Amazonian forests of the upper Rio Negro basin. Pages. S217 – S240. in J. Proctor, editor. Mineral nutrients in tropical forest and savanna ecosystems Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, UK.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoran, J. A., M. G. Barker, A. J. Moran, P. Becker, and S. M. Ross. 2000. A comparison of the soil water, nutrient status, and litterfall characteristics of tropical heath and mixed dipterocarp forest sites in Brunei. Biotropica 32: S2 – S13.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoran, N. and W. D. Hamilton. 1980. Low nutritive quality as defense against herbivores. Journal of Theoretical Biology 86: S247 – S254.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNichols-Orians, C.. 1991. The effects of light on foliar chemistry growth and susceptibility of seedlings of a canopy tree to an attine ant. Oecologia 86: S552 – S560.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOlff, H. and M. E. Ritchie. 1998. Effects of herbivores on grassland plant diversity. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13: S261 – S265.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceParker, M. A. and R. B. Root. 1981. Insect herbivores limit habitat distribution of a native composite, Machaeranthera canescens. Ecology 62: S1390 – S1392.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRuokolainen, K. and H. Tuomisto. 1998. Vegetación de la zona de Iquitos. Pages. S253 – S368. in R. Kalliola and S. Flores Paitán, editors. Geoecologia y desarrollo Amazonico: estudio integrado en la zona de Iquitos, Peru University of Turku Press, Turku, Finland.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSääksjärvi, I. E.. 2003. Diversity of parasitic wasps (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) in a lowland rain forest mosaic in Peruvian Amazonia. Dissertation University of Turku, Turku, Finland.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchiers, J., L. de Bruyn, and R. Verhagen. 2003. Host nutritive quality and host plant choice in two grass miners: Primary roles for primary compounds? Journal of Chemical Ecology 29: S1373 – S1389.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchultes, R. E. and R. F. Raffauf. 1990. The healing forest: medicinal and toxic plants of the northwest Amazonia Dioscorides, Portland, Oregon, USA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSimms, E. and M. Rausher. 1987. Cost and benefits of plant resistance to herbivory. American Naturalist 130: S570 – S581.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSokal, R. R. and F. J. Rohlf. 1995. Biometry. Third edition W. H. Freeman, New York, New York, USA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStork, N. E.. 1988. Insect diversity: facts, fiction and speculation. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 35: S321 – S337.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTurner, I. M.. 1994. Sclerophylly: Primarily protective? Functional Ecology 8: S669 – S675.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVásquez Martínez, R.. 1997. Florula de las reservas biologicas de Iquitos, Peru. Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St Louis, Missouri, USA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZar, J. H.. 1999. Biostatistical analysis. Fourth edition Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAbouheif, E.. 1999. A method for testing the assumption of phylogenetic independence in comparative data. Evolutionary Ecology Research 1: S895 – S909.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAgrawal, A. A. and M. Fishbein. 2006. Plant defense syndromes. Ecology 87: SS132 – SS149.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAgrawal, A. A. and P. M. Kotanen. 2003. Herbivores and the success of exotic plants: a phylogenetically controlled experiment. Ecology Letters 6: S712 – S715.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAppel, H. M., H. Govenor, M. D'Ascenzo, E. Siska, and J. C. Schultz. 2001. Limitations of Folin assays of foliar phenolics in ecological studies. Journal of Chemical Ecology 27: S761 – S778.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAshton, P. S.. 1969. Speciation among tropical forest trees: some deductions in the light of recent evidence. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 1: S155 – S196.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBernays, E. A., G. Cooper Driver, and M. Bilgener. 1989. Herbivores and plant tannins. Advances in Ecological Research 19: S263 – S302.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBinkley, D. and P. Matson. 1983. Ion-exchange resin bag method for assessing forest soil-nitrogen availability. Soil Science Society of America Journal 47: S1050 – S1052.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoege, K. and R. Dirzo. 2004. Intraspecific variation in growth, defense and herbivory in Dialium guianense (Caesalpiniaceae) mediated by edaphic heterogeneity. Plant Ecology 175: S59 – S69.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBunce, J. A., B. F. Chabot, and L. N. Miller. 1979. Role of annual leaf carbon balance in the distribution of plant species along an elevational gradient. Botanical Gazette 140: S288 – S294.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarson, W. and R. Root. 2000. Herbivory and plant species coexistence: community regulation by an outbreaking phytophagous insect. Ecological Monographs 70: S73 – S99.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCavender-Bares, J., D. D. Ackerly, D. A. Baum, and F. A. Bazzaz. 2004. Phylogenetic overdispersion in Floridian oak communities. American Naturalist 163: S823 – S843.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChoong, M., P. Lucas, J. Ong, B. Pereira, H. Tan, and I. Turner. 1992. Leaf fracture toughness and sclerophylly: their correlations and ecological implications. New Phytologist 121: S597 – S610.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceClose, D. C. and C. McArthur. 2002. Rethinking the role of many plant phenolics—Protection from photodamage not herbivores? Oikos 99: S166 – S172.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCody, M. L.. 1978. Distribution ecology of Happlopappus and Chrysothamnus in the Mohave desert. I. Niche position and nice shifts on north-facing granitic slopes. American Journal of Botany 65: S1107 – S1116.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceColey, P. D.. 1983. Herbivory and defensive characteristics of tree species in a lowland tropical forest. Ecological Monographs 53: S209 – S233.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceColey, P. D.. 1987a. Patrones en las defensas de las plantas: ¿porqué los herbívoros prefieren ciertas especies? Revista Biologica Tropical 35 Supplement 1: S151 – S164.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceColey, P. D.. 1987b. Interspecific variation in plant anti-herbivore properties: the role of habitat quality and rate of disturbance. New Phytologist 106 Supplement: S251 – S263.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceColey, P. D., J. P. Bryant, and F. S. Chapin III. 1985. Resource availability and plant anti-herbivore defense. Science 230: S895 – S899.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCoomes, D. A. and P. J. Grubb. 1998. Responses of juvenile trees to above- and belowground competition in nutrient-starved Amazonian rain forest. Ecology 79: S768 – S782.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCraine, J., W. Bond, W. Lee, P. Reich, and S. Ollinger. 2003. The resource economics of chemical and structural defenses across nitrogen supply gradients. Oecologia 442: S547 – S556.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDenno, R. F., C. Gratton, M. A. Peterson, G. A. Langellotto, D. L. Finke, and A. F. Huberty. 2002. Bottom-up forces mediate natural-enemy impact in a phytophagous insect community. Ecology 83: S1443 – S1458.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEdwards, C., J. Read, and G. Sanson. 2000. Characterising sclerophylly: some mechanical properties of leaves from heath and forest. Oecologia 123: S158 – S167.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFine, P. V A.. 2004. Herbivory and the evolution of habitat specialization by trees in Amazonian forests. Dissertation University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
ecy200687sp7s150.pdf
Size:
294.5KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.