Show simple item record

Impacts of Renewable Portfolio Standards

dc.contributor.authorLyon, Thomas P.
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-17T14:31:58Z
dc.date.available2016-02-17T14:31:58Z
dc.date.issued2016-01
dc.identifier1303en_US
dc.identifier.citationUSAEE Working Paper No. 16-232en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/117360
dc.description.abstractRenewable Portfolio Standards (RPSs) are a key policy measure used by U.S. states to increase their production of renewable electricity. Economic theory shows that RPSs are not first-best policy measures for mitigating greenhouse gas emissions or solving other environmental problems. Nevertheless, they have been politically popular, in part because states hope they will help create new jobs in what they expect will be a growth industry. Research suggests that RPSs tend to be supported by Democratic legislatures in states with good solar and wind potential, are more likely in states with restructured electricity markets, and are less likely in states heavily dependent upon natural gas for electricity generation. Research also suggests RPSs have been successful at increasing renewable generation capacity, have increased the cost of electricity modestly where they have been implemented, and reduce carbon emissions at a cost roughly consistent with estimates of the social cost of carbon.en_US
dc.subjectrenewable energyen_US
dc.subjectstate policyen_US
dc.subjectelectricityen_US
dc.subjectpolitical economyen_US
dc.subject.classificationBusiness Economicsen_US
dc.titleImpacts of Renewable Portfolio Standardsen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelBusiness (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelBusiness
dc.contributor.affiliationumRoss School of Businessen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arbor
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/117360/1/1303_Lyon.pdf
dc.owningcollnameBusiness, Stephen M. Ross School of - Working Papers Series


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.