Consumer regret: The exploration of a cognitive /affective construct.
dc.contributor.author | Aron, David | |
dc.contributor.advisor | Bagozzi, Richard P. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-08-30T15:37:59Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-08-30T15:37:59Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1999 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3006413 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/124457 | |
dc.description.abstract | Consumer regret is an appraisal-based emotional construct representing a consumer's response to (or anticipation of) an unpleasant product- (or service-) related experience. This research is designed to define consumer regret, to distinguish it from other consumption-related appraisals (including dissatisfaction), and to consider other variables influencing consumer regret in an applied context. In the first of three studies, higher levels of regret were experienced when consumers attributed responsibility for their negative outcome to themselves while higher levels of dissatisfaction were found in the low self-attribution condition. The second study elaborated on different coping responses to consumer regret and consumer dissatisfaction. Consumers wrote of experiences of regret or dissatisfaction, and many of their coping responses (categorized as feelings, thoughts, actions, action tendencies, emotivational goals, and complaining behavior) to regret differed from those related to dissatisfaction. The third study explored variables yet to be considered in the regret context: the size of the decision making unit, the level of agreement of an individual consumer within that unit, and consumer's gender. The only significant main effect indicates that a group member who does not strongly agree with the group purchase decision experiences more regret than one who does strongly agree. Further investigation suggests that there is a significant interaction among gender, group size, and agreement level: men experienced greater regret when they fail to strongly agree in groups of two, and women when they fail to strongly agree in groups of three or more. Implications and suggested future research are also discussed. | |
dc.format.extent | 153 p. | |
dc.language | English | |
dc.language.iso | EN | |
dc.subject | Cognitive/affective | |
dc.subject | Construct | |
dc.subject | Consumer Regret | |
dc.subject | Exploration | |
dc.title | Consumer regret: The exploration of a cognitive /affective construct. | |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.description.thesisdegreename | PhD | en_US |
dc.description.thesisdegreediscipline | Cognitive psychology | |
dc.description.thesisdegreediscipline | Marketing | |
dc.description.thesisdegreediscipline | Psychology | |
dc.description.thesisdegreediscipline | Social Sciences | |
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantor | University of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies | |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/124457/2/3006413.pdf | |
dc.owningcollname | Dissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's) |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.