Show simple item record

Consumer regret: The exploration of a cognitive /affective construct.

dc.contributor.authorAron, David
dc.contributor.advisorBagozzi, Richard P.
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-30T15:37:59Z
dc.date.available2016-08-30T15:37:59Z
dc.date.issued1999
dc.identifier.urihttp://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3006413
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/124457
dc.description.abstractConsumer regret is an appraisal-based emotional construct representing a consumer's response to (or anticipation of) an unpleasant product- (or service-) related experience. This research is designed to define consumer regret, to distinguish it from other consumption-related appraisals (including dissatisfaction), and to consider other variables influencing consumer regret in an applied context. In the first of three studies, higher levels of regret were experienced when consumers attributed responsibility for their negative outcome to themselves while higher levels of dissatisfaction were found in the low self-attribution condition. The second study elaborated on different coping responses to consumer regret and consumer dissatisfaction. Consumers wrote of experiences of regret or dissatisfaction, and many of their coping responses (categorized as feelings, thoughts, actions, action tendencies, emotivational goals, and complaining behavior) to regret differed from those related to dissatisfaction. The third study explored variables yet to be considered in the regret context: the size of the decision making unit, the level of agreement of an individual consumer within that unit, and consumer's gender. The only significant main effect indicates that a group member who does not strongly agree with the group purchase decision experiences more regret than one who does strongly agree. Further investigation suggests that there is a significant interaction among gender, group size, and agreement level: men experienced greater regret when they fail to strongly agree in groups of two, and women when they fail to strongly agree in groups of three or more. Implications and suggested future research are also discussed.
dc.format.extent153 p.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoEN
dc.subjectCognitive/affective
dc.subjectConstruct
dc.subjectConsumer Regret
dc.subjectExploration
dc.titleConsumer regret: The exploration of a cognitive /affective construct.
dc.typeThesis
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineCognitive psychology
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineMarketing
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplinePsychology
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineSocial Sciences
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/124457/2/3006413.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.