Show simple item record

Estimating infant head injury tolerance and impact response.

dc.contributor.authorKlinich, Kathleen DeSantis
dc.contributor.advisorHulbert, Gregory M.
dc.contributor.advisorSchneider, Lawrence W.
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-30T15:59:06Z
dc.date.available2016-08-30T15:59:06Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.identifier.urihttp://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3208303
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/125586
dc.description.abstractA unique mechanism of infant death in motor-vehicle crashes has developed in the past decade. In relatively minor frontal impacts, infants have sustained serious head injuries while restrained in rear-facing child restraint systems (CRS) that were loaded by deploying passenger-side airbags. This study combines finite element modeling (FEM) and physical reconstructions of infant head injury scenarios to investigate infant head impact response and skull fracture tolerance. FEM supplemented the results from reconstruction testing to examine the role of cranial sutures on infant skull response and to estimate stresses associated with infant skull fracture. A secondary goal was to assess the ability of the current CRABI anthropomorphic test device (ATD) to evaluate safety countermeasures for infants. The specific injury scenarios selected for laboratory reconstruction involved infants in rear-facing CRS who sustained skull fractures from deploying passenger-side airbags. Approximations of the loading conditions for three injury cases, as well as estimates of loading conditions not expected to result in head injury, were produced in the laboratory. Concurrently, a FEM of a 6-month-old infant was developed, and a parameter study was performed to evaluate the effect of different material properties. A method was developed to use the CRS acceleration data measured in the reconstruction tests to load the infant head FEM. The infant head FEM was used to simulate different loading conditions estimated in the reconstruction tests. The parameter study showed that skull modulus and brain incompressibility had the greatest effect on head impact response, while cranial suture modulus had a negligible effect. Infant head FEM acceleration results and stress distributions are consistent with the level of injury for each case. Estimates of threshold stresses associated with skull fracture were made through logistic regression analysis. The acceleration responses of the infant head FEM and the CRABI ATD were compared for the no-injury and injury-producing conditions. Results suggest that the biofidelic loading range of the CRABI ATD may be limited to those below injury-producing loading severities. Injury assessment reference values corresponding to the threshold for minor skull fracture were estimated for the current CRABI ATD, in addition to recommended improvements for the CRABI ATD head.
dc.format.extent275 p.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoEN
dc.subjectAutomobile Crashes
dc.subjectChild Restraint Systems
dc.subjectEstimating
dc.subjectHead Injury
dc.subjectImpact
dc.subjectInfant
dc.subjectResponse
dc.subjectTolerance
dc.titleEstimating infant head injury tolerance and impact response.
dc.typeThesis
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineApplied Sciences
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineAutomotive engineering
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineBiomedical engineering
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineMechanical engineering
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/125586/2/3208303.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.