Show simple item record

Kitchens and dining rooms at Pompeii: The spatial and social relationship of cooking to eating in the Roman household. (Volumes I and II).

dc.contributor.authorFoss, Pedar William
dc.contributor.advisorAlcock, Susan E.
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-30T17:08:30Z
dc.date.available2016-08-30T17:08:30Z
dc.date.issued1994
dc.identifier.urihttp://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:9513356
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/129446
dc.description.abstractThe physical, environmental, decorative, and ritual arrangements for cooking and dining are documented in a large sample of residences from six contiguous insulae at Pompeii. The descriptions, measurements, photographs, and plans will prove an invaluable resource for Pompeian archaeologists and architects, and historians of Roman domestic life and foodways. An analysis of this archaeological evidence shows how residents organized domestic space for the purposes of taking their daily meals. The units of analysis are groups of buildings carefully defined by architectural criteria, and which represent the place of their occupants along the socio-economic spectrum of the community. Against a background of ancient literature and modern scholarship, I investigate how meals structured Roman social relationships. The preparation and consumption of meals in Pompeii and the Roman world acted as a social barometer. Larger households had larger, better decorated, and more numerous dining areas, and a larger cooking capacity than smaller households. Larger households not only had more mouths to feed, but their dinners were social occasions to which guests were invited, and at which status was evaluated. In order to impress their guests, cultivate social ties and reinforce their position, owners constructed arrays of dining areas that were environmentally moderated, highly decorated and had views onto gardens and water-play. The number and size of dining areas, the expense given over to their elaboration, the physical distance between dining and cooking areas, and the social distance between free and slave household members all decreased toward the lower end of the socio-economic spectrum. In larger households, intra-household social distinctions between slave and free were highlighted and formalized at dinner. Kitchens were located far from dining areas, and sections of the largest houses were reserved for slaves to cook and eat their food. In the smallest shops, eating and cooking were done informally in the same space, with no contingency for mealtime social interaction with outside guests--company was enjoyed at neighborhood meeting places, over the snacks and drinks of lunch counters and diners. In sum, socially proximate individuals tended to eat together, in environments that befit their status.
dc.format.extent492 p.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoEN
dc.subjectCooking
dc.subjectDining
dc.subjectEating
dc.subjectEatingroman
dc.subjectHousehold
dc.subjectIi
dc.subjectItaly
dc.subjectKitchens
dc.subjectPompeii
dc.subjectRelationship
dc.subjectRoman
dc.subjectRooms
dc.subjectSocial
dc.subjectSpatial
dc.subjectVolumes
dc.titleKitchens and dining rooms at Pompeii: The spatial and social relationship of cooking to eating in the Roman household. (Volumes I and II).
dc.typeThesis
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineAncient history
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineArchaeology
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineArchitecture
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineClassical literature
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineCommunication and the Arts
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineLanguage, Literature and Linguistics
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineSocial Sciences
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/129446/2/9513356.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.