Show simple item record

Development and evaluation of an ISO 9000-harmonized occupational health and safety management system.

dc.contributor.authorDyjack, David Thomas
dc.contributor.advisorLevine, Steven
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-30T17:17:37Z
dc.date.available2016-08-30T17:17:37Z
dc.date.issued1996
dc.identifier.urihttp://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:9709170
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/129921
dc.description.abstractCorporate ISO 9000 registration is gaining international acceptance as the hallmark of quality system achievement. The International Organization for Standardization is currently considering development of an ISO harmonized occupational health and safety management systems standard. The purpose of this dissertation was to (1) identify and evaluate the critical issues associated with the development of an ISO occupational health standard, and (2) develop and evaluate a theoretical ISO 9000-harmonized management system. The investigators conducted literature reviews, interviewed industrial, governmental, and non-governmental occupational health professionals, conducted occupational health and safety site audits in collaboration with the US Department of Labor Office of Cooperative Programs, and chaired a national occupational health management systems task force. A modified Delphi process was employed to develop the ISO 9000-harmonized health and safety management system. This system was qualitatively and quantitatively compared against an existing health and safety assessment instrument used in industry. The research revealed numerous advantages and disadvantages of the ISO management systems approach to health and safety. The major advantages included maximizing the efficiency of governmental health and safety compliance personnel, increased emphasis on employee driven health and safety programs, and enhanced efforts for the preventive aspects of workplace health and safety. Major disadvantages were the single vote of the American National Standards Institute at international proceedings, ISO 9000 program development costs, registrar performance and ethics issues, and lack of validated performance measures. The qualitative and quantitative comparison of the ISO 9000 health and safety management system with an existing industrial assessment instrument showed that the scope and content of the two were similar with some subtle but potentially important differences. These differences included root cause identification, prioritization of health and safety related activities, and emphasis on specification standards. The investigators recommend future research be conducted on the identification of prevention oriented health and safety performance measures, ISO 9000 health and safety assessment instrument validity and reliability, and mortality/morbidity outcomes associated with use of the ISO management systems model.
dc.format.extent221 p.
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoEN
dc.subjectAnd
dc.subjectDevelopment
dc.subjectEvaluation
dc.subjectHarmonized
dc.subjectHealth
dc.subjectIso
dc.subjectManagement
dc.subjectOccupational
dc.subjectSafety
dc.subjectSystem
dc.titleDevelopment and evaluation of an ISO 9000-harmonized occupational health and safety management system.
dc.typeThesis
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineHealth and Environmental Sciences
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineManagement
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineOccupational safety
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineSocial Sciences
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies, School of Public Health
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/129921/2/9709170.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.