Show simple item record

Visualizing biological data in museums: Visitor learning with an interactive tree of life exhibit

dc.contributor.authorHorn, Michael S.
dc.contributor.authorPhillips, Brenda C.
dc.contributor.authorEvans, Evelyn Margaret
dc.contributor.authorBlock, Florian
dc.contributor.authorDiamond, Judy
dc.contributor.authorShen, Chia
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-17T23:53:44Z
dc.date.available2017-11-01T15:31:29Zen
dc.date.issued2016-08
dc.identifier.citationHorn, Michael S.; Phillips, Brenda C.; Evans, Evelyn Margaret; Block, Florian; Diamond, Judy; Shen, Chia (2016). "Visualizing biological data in museums: Visitor learning with an interactive tree of life exhibit." Journal of Research in Science Teaching 53(6): 895-918.
dc.identifier.issn0022-4308
dc.identifier.issn1098-2736
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/133553
dc.description.abstractIn this study, we investigate museum visitor learning and engagement at an interactive visualization of an evolutionary tree of life consisting of over 70,000 species. The study was conducted at two natural history museums where visitors collaboratively explored the tree of life using direct touch gestures on a multi‐touch tabletop display. In the study, 247 youth, aged 8–15 years, were randomly assigned in pairs to one of four conditions. In two of the conditions, pairs of youth interacted with different versions of the tree of life tabletop exhibit for a fixed duration of 10 minutes. In a third condition, pairs watched a 10 minute video on a similar topic. Individual responses on a 53‐item exit interview were then compared to responses from a fourth, baseline condition. Contrasting with the baseline condition, visitors who interacted with the tabletop exhibits were significantly more likely to reason correctly about core evolutionary concepts, particularly common descent and shared ancestry. They were also more likely to correctly interpret phylogenetic tree diagrams. To investigate the factors influencing these learning outcomes, we used linear mixed models to analyze measures of dyads’ verbal engagement and physical interaction with the exhibit. These models indicated that, while our verbal and physical measures were related, they accounted for significant portions of the variance on their own, independent of youth age, prior knowledge, and parental background. Our results provide evidence that multi‐touch interactive exhibits that enable visitors to explore large scientific datasets can provide engaging and effective learning opportunities. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 53: 895–918, 2016
dc.publisherACM Press
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otherinformation visualization
dc.subject.othermuseums
dc.subject.otherevolution
dc.subject.otherinteractive tabletops
dc.subject.otherinformal science learning
dc.titleVisualizing biological data in museums: Visitor learning with an interactive tree of life exhibit
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelManagement
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelScience (General)
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelWomen’s and Gender Studies
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEducation
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelBusiness and Economics
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScience
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHumanities
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/133553/1/tea21318-sup-0001-SuppTable-S1.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/133553/2/tea21318_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/133553/3/tea21318-sup-0002-SuppTable-S2.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/133553/4/tea21318.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/tea.21318
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Research in Science Teaching
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilensky, U., & Reisman, K. ( 2006 ). Thinking like a wolf, a sheep, or a firefly: Learning biology through constructing and testing computational theories—An embodied modeling approach. Cognition and Instruction, 24, 171 – 209.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHinrichs, U., & Carpendale, S. ( 2011 ). Gestures in the wild: Studying multi‐touch gesture sequences on interactive tabletop exhibits. In Proceedings ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 3023 – 3032 ). ACM Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHinrichs, U., Schmidt, H., & Carpendale, S. ( 2008 ). EMDialog: Bringing information visualization into the museum. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 14, 1181 – 1188.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHorn, M. S., Leong, Z. A., Block, F., Diamond, J., Evans, E. M., Phillips, B., & Shen, C. ( 2012 ). Of BATs and APEs: An interactive tabletop game for natural history museums. In Proceedings ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2059 – 2068 ). ACM Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHornecker, E. ( 2008 ). “ I don’t understand it either, but it is cool”‐visitor interactions with a multi‐touch table in a museum. Proceedings IEEE Tabletop, 2008, (pp. 113 – 120 ).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHumphrey, T., & Gutwill, J., Exploratorium APE Team. ( 2005 ). Fostering active prolonged engagement. San Francisco, CA: The Exploratorium.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKorn, R. ( 1995 ). An analysis of differences between visitors at natural history museums and science centers. Curator: The Museum Journal, 38 ( 3 ), 150 – 160.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLegare, C. H., Lane, J. D., & Evans, E. M. ( 2013 ). Anthropomorphizing science: How does it affect the development of evolutionary concepts ? Merrill‐Palmer Quarterly, 59, 168 – 197.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLouw, M., & Crowley, K. ( 2013 ). New ways of looking and learning in natural history museums: The use of gigapixel imaging to bring science and publics together. Curator, 52, 87 – 104.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMa, J., Liao, I., Ma, K. L., & Frazier, J. ( 2012 ). Living liquid: Design and evaluation of an exploratory visualization tool for museum visitors. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 18, 2799 – 2808.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMacDonald, T., & Wiley, E. O. ( 2012 ). Communicating phylogeny: Evolutionary tree diagrams in museums. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 5, 14 – 28.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMacFadden, B. J., Dunckel, B. A., Ellis, S., Dierking, L. D., Abraham‐Silver, L., Kisiel, J., & Koke, J. ( 2007 ). Natural history museum visitors’ understanding of evolution. BioScience, 57, 875 – 882.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcGaugh, J. L. ( 2006 ). Make mild moments memorable: Add a little arousal [Review]. Trends Cognitive Science, 10, 345 – 347.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMeir, E., Perry, J., Herron, J. C., & Kingsolver, J. ( 2007 ). College students’ misconceptions about evolutionary trees. The Amer. Biology Teacher, 69, e71 – e76.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMiller, J. D., Scott, E. C., & Okamoto, S. ( 2006 ). Public acceptance of evolution. Science, 313, 765 – 766.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNewport, F. ( 2014 ). In US, 42% believe creationist view of human origins: Americans’ views related to religiousness, age, education. Gallup Poll, May 2014 [data set]. Retrieved from: http://www.gallup.com/poll/170822/believe-creationist-viewhuman-origins.aspx
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNezlek, J. B. ( 2008 ). An introduction to multilevel modeling for social and personality psychology. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 842 – 860.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNovick, L. R., & Catley, K. M. ( 2012 ). Assessing students’ understanding of macroevolution: Concerns regarding the validity of the MUM. Science Education, 34, 2679 – 2703.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNovick, L. R., & Catley, K. M. ( 2013 ). Reasoning about evolution’s grand patterns college students’ understanding of the tree of life. American Educational Research Journal, 50, 138 – 177.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNovick, L. R., Catley, K. M., & Funk, D. J. ( 2010 ). Characters are key: The effect of synapomorphies on cladogram comprehension. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 3, 539 – 547.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNovick, L. R., Catley, K. M., & Funk, D. J. ( 2011 ). Inference is bliss: Using evolutionary relationship to guide categorical inferences. Cognitive Science, 35, 712 – 743.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePhillips, B. C., Novick, L. R., & Catley, K. M. ( 2011 ). Form, function, & habitat: Similarity of responses among college students and children to questions about evolutionary relatedness. Paper presented at the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Jean Piaget Society. Berkeley, CA.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePhillips, B. C., Novick, L. R., Catley, K. M., & Funk, D. J. ( 2012 ). Teaching tree thinking to college students: It’s not as easy as you think. Evolution: Education & Outreach, 5 ( 4 ), 595 – 602.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePoling, D. A., & Evans, E. M. ( 2004 ). Religious belief, scientific expertise, and folk ecology. Cognition and Culture: Studies in the Cognitive Anthropology of Science, 4, 485 – 524.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePrum, A. J. (Producer). ( 2008 ). Discovering the great tree of life. Available from the Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University, P.O. Box 208118, New Haven, CT. http://archive.peabody.yale.edu/exhibits/treeoflife/film_discovering.html
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoberts, J., Lyons, L., Cafaro, F., & Eydt, R. ( 2014 ). Interpreting data from within: Supporting human‐data interaction in museum exhibits through perspective taking. In Proceedings Interaction Design and Children (pp. 7 – 16 ). ACM Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSeoh, K. H. R., Subramaniam, R., & Hoh, Y. K. ( 2015 ). How humans evolved according to Grade 12 students in Singapore. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53, 291 – 323. doi: 10.1002/tea.21256.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSamarapungavan, A., & Wiers, R. W. ( 1997 ). Children’s thoughts on the origin of species: A study of explanatory coherence. Cognitive Science, 21 ( 2 ), 147 – 177. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog2102_2.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShtulman, A., & Schulz, L. ( 2008 ). The relation between essentialist beliefs and evolutionary reasoning. Cognitive Science, 32, 1049 – 1062.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSnibbe, S. S., & Raffle, H. S. ( 2009 ). Social immersive media: Pursuing best practices for multi‐user interactive camera/projector exhibits. In Proceedings ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1447 – 1456 ). ACM Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSpiegel, A. N., Evans, E. M., Frazier, B., Hazel, A., Tare, M., Gram, W., & Diamond, J. ( 2012 ). Changing museum visitors’ conceptions of evolution. Evolution: Education & Outreach, 5, 43 – 61.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTare, M., French, J., Frazier, B., Diamond, J., & Evans, E. M. ( 2011 ). Explanatory parent‐child conversation predominates at an evolution exhibit. Science Education, 95, 720 – 744.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAntle, A. N., Tanenbaum, J., Seaborn, K., Bevans, A., & Wang, S. ( 2011 ). Futura: Design for collaborative learning and game play on a multi‐touch digital tabletop. In Proceedings of Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction (pp. 93 – 100 ). ACM Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBanet, E., & Ayuso, G. E. ( 2003 ). Teaching of biological inheritance and evolution of living beings in secondary school. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 373 – 407.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBaum, D. A., Smith, S., & Donovan, S. ( 2005 ). Tree‐thinking challenge. Science, 310, 979 – 980.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBishop, B. A., & Anderson, C. W. ( 1990 ). Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 415 – 427.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBlock, F., Hammerman, J., Horn, M. S., Phillips, B. C., Evans, E. M., Diamond, J., & Shen, C. ( 2015 ). Fluid grouping: Quantifying group engagement around interactive tabletop exhibits in the wild. In Proceedings ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 867 – 876 ). ACM Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBlock, F., Horn, M. S., Phillips, B. C., Diamond, J., Evans, E. M., & Shen, C. ( 2012a ). DeepTree exhibit: Visualizing the tree of life to facilitate informal learning. IEEE Transaction on Visualization & Computer Graphics, 18 ( 12 ), 2789 – 2798.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBlock, F., Wigdor, D., Phillips, B. C., Horn, M. S., & Shen, C. ( 2012b ). FlowBlocks: A multi‐touch UI for crowd interaction. In Proceedings ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (pp. 497 – 508 ). ACM Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCatley, K. M., Phillips, B. C., & Novick, L. R. ( 2013 ). Snakes and eels and dogs! Oh, my! Evaluating high school students’ tree‐thinking skills: An entry point to understanding evolution. Research in Science Education, 43, 2327 – 2348.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCohen, J. ( 1988 ). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCracraft, J., & Donoghue, M. J. ( 2004 ). Assembling the tree of life. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCrowley, K., Callanan, M. A., Jipson, J. L., Galco, J., Topping, K., & Shrager, J. ( 2001 ). Shared scientific thinking in everyday parent‐child activity. Science Education, 85, 712 – 732.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDiamond, J., & Evans, E. M. ( 2007 ). Museums teach evolution. Evolution, 61, 1500 – 1506.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDiamond, J., & Scotchmoor, J. ( 2006 ). Exhibiting evolution. Museums & Social Issues, 1, 21 – 48.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDavis, P., Horn, M. S., Block, F., Phillips, B., Evans, E. M., Diamond, J., & Shen, C. ( 2015 ). “ Whoa! We’re going deep in the trees!”: Patterns of collaboration around an interactive information visualization exhibit. International Journal of Computer‐Supported Collaborative Learning, 10, 53 – 76.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEberbach, C., & Crowley, K. ( 2005 ). From living to virtual: Learning from museum objects. Curator: The Museum Journal, 48, 317 – 338.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEvans, E. M. ( 2000 ). The emergence of beliefs about the origins of species in school‐age children. Merrill‐Palmer Quarterly, 46, 221 – 254.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEvans, E. M. ( 2001 ). Cognitive and contextual factors in the emergence of diverse belief systems: Creation versus evolution. Cognitive Psychology, 42, 217 – 266.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEvans, E. M. ( 2013 ). Conceptual change and evolutionary biology: Taking a developmental perspective. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 220–239). New York, NY: Routledge [Second Edition].
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEvans, E. M., Rosengren, K., Lane, J. D., & Price, K. S. ( 2012 ). Encountering counterintuitive ideas: Constructing a developmental learning progression for biological evolution. In K. R. Rosengren, S. Brem, E. M. Evans, & G. Sinatra (Eds.), Evolution challenges: Integrating research and practice in teaching and learning about evolution (pp. 174–199). New York, NY: OUP.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEvans, E. M., Spiegel, A. N., Gram, W., Frazier, B. N., Tare, M., Thompson, S., & Diamond, J. ( 2010 ). A conceptual guide to natural history museum visitors’ understanding of evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 326 – 353.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEvans, E. M., Weiss, M., Lane, J., & Palmquist, S. ( 2015 ). The spiral model: Integrating research and exhibit development to foster conceptual change. In D. M. Sobel, & J. Jipson (Eds.), Cognitive development in museum settings: Relating research and practice (pp. 36–64). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFalk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. ( 2000 ). Learning from museums: Visitor experiences and the making of meaning. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFoster, I. ( 2006 ). 2020 computing: A two‐way street to science’s future. Nature, 440 ( 7083 ), 419 – 419.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGelman, S. A., & Rhodes, M. ( 2012 ). Two‐thousand years of stasis. In K. R. Rosengren, S. Brem, E. M. Evans, & G. Sinatra (Eds.), Evolution challenges: Integrating research and practice in teaching and learning about evolution (pp. 200 – 207 ). New York, NY: Oxford.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.