Show simple item record

Surgical protocol violations in children with renal tumors provides an opportunity to improve pediatric cancer care: a report from the Children’s Oncology Group

dc.contributor.authorEhrlich, Peter F.
dc.contributor.authorHamilton, Thomas E.
dc.contributor.authorGow, Kenneth
dc.contributor.authorBarnhart, Douglas
dc.contributor.authorFerrer, Fernando
dc.contributor.authorKandel, Jessica
dc.contributor.authorGlick, Richard
dc.contributor.authorDasgupta, Roshni
dc.contributor.authorNaranjo, Arlene
dc.contributor.authorHe, Ying
dc.contributor.authorPerlman, Elizabeth J.
dc.contributor.authorKalapurakal, John A.
dc.contributor.authorKhanna, Geetika
dc.contributor.authorDome, Jeffrey S.
dc.contributor.authorGeller, James
dc.contributor.authorMullen, Elizabeth
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-17T21:16:57Z
dc.date.available2018-01-08T19:47:51Zen
dc.date.issued2016-11
dc.identifier.citationEhrlich, Peter F.; Hamilton, Thomas E.; Gow, Kenneth; Barnhart, Douglas; Ferrer, Fernando; Kandel, Jessica; Glick, Richard; Dasgupta, Roshni; Naranjo, Arlene; He, Ying; Perlman, Elizabeth J.; Kalapurakal, John A.; Khanna, Geetika; Dome, Jeffrey S.; Geller, James; Mullen, Elizabeth (2016). "Surgical protocol violations in children with renal tumors provides an opportunity to improve pediatric cancer care: a report from the Children’s Oncology Group." Pediatric Blood & Cancer 63(11): 1905-1910.
dc.identifier.issn1545-5009
dc.identifier.issn1545-5017
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/134088
dc.description.abstractBackgroundThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the frequency and characteristics of surgical protocol violations (SPVs) among children undergoing surgery for renal tumors who were enrolled on the Children’s Oncology Group (COG) renal tumor biology and classification study AREN03B2.MethodsAREN03B2 was opened in February 2006, and as on March 31, 2013, there were 3,664 eligible patients. The surgical review forms for 3,536 patients with unilateral disease were centrally reviewed for SPVs. The frequency, type, number of violations, institutional prevalence, and quartiles for SPVs were assessed.ResultsOf the 3,536 patients, there were a total of 505 with at least one SPV (564 total SPVs reported), for an overall incidence of 14.28%. The types of SPVs included a lack of lymph node sampling in 365 (64.7%), avoidable spill in 61 (10.8%), biopsy immediately before nephrectomy in 89 (15.8%), an incorrect abdominal incision in 32 (5.7%), and unnecessary resection of organs in 17 (3.0%). The SPVs occurred in 163 of 215 participating institutions (75.8%). For centers with at least one SPV, the mean number of SPVs reported was 3.10 ± 2.39 (mean ± standard deviation). The incidence of protocol violation per institution ranged from 0 to 67%. Centers with an average of ≤1 case/year had an incidence of SPVs of 12.2 ± 3.8%, those with an average of >1 to <4 cases/year had an incidence of SPVs of 16.4 ± 3.6%, and those with an average of ≥4 cases/year had an incidence of SPVs of 12.6 ± 5.5% (P > 0.05).ConclusionsSPVs that potentially result in additional exposure to chemotherapy and radiation therapy are not uncommon in children undergoing resection of renal malignancies.
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.othersurgery
dc.subject.otherWilms tumor
dc.subject.otherquality improvement
dc.titleSurgical protocol violations in children with renal tumors provides an opportunity to improve pediatric cancer care: a report from the Children’s Oncology Group
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPediatrics
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/134088/1/pbc26083.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/134088/2/pbc26083_am.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/pbc.26083
dc.identifier.sourcePediatric Blood & Cancer
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLiu M, Druschel CM, Hannan EL. Risk‐adjusted prolonged length of stay as an alternative outcome measure for pediatric congenital cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Jun; 97 ( 6 ): 2154 – 9.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceO’Connor GT, Plume SK, Olmstead EM, et al. A regional prospective study of in‐hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass grafting. The northern new England cardiovascular disease study group. JAMA. 1991; 266: 803 – 809.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBirkmeyer JD, Dimick JB, Staiger DO. Operative mortality and procedure volume as predictors of subsequent hospital performance. Ann Surg. 2006; 243: 411 – 417.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBirkmeyer JD, Shahian DM, Dimick JB, et al. Blueprint for a new American College of Surgeons: National surgical quality improvement program. J Am Coll Surg. 2008; 207: 777 – 782.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDimick JB, Staiger DO, Osborne NH, Nicholas LH, Birkmeyer JD. Composite measures for rating hospital quality with major surgery. Health Serv Res. 2012; 47: 1861 – 1879.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSonnenday CJ, Birkmeyer JD. A tale of two provinces: Regionalization of pancreatic surgery in Ontario and Quebec. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010; 17: 2535 – 2536.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcAteer JP, Lariviere CA, Oldham KT, Goldin AB. Shifts towards pediatric specialists in the treatment of appendicitis and pyloric stenosis: Trends and outcomes. J Pediatr Surg. 2014; 49: 123 – 128.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcAteer JP, Lariviere CA, Drugas GT, Abdullah F, Oldham KT, Goldin AB. Influence of surgeon experience, hospital volume, and specialty designation on outcomes in pediatric surgery: A systematic review. JAMA Pediatr. 2013; 167: 468 – 475.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVinocur JM, Menk JS, Connett J, Moller JH, Kochilas LK. Surgical volume and center effects on early mortality after pediatric cardiac surgery: 25‐Year North American experience from a multi‐institutional registry. Pediatr Cardiol.. 2013; 34: 1226 – 1236.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEhrlich PF, Ritchey ML, Hamilton TE, et al. Quality assessment for Wilms’ tumor: A report from the National Wilms’ Tumor Study‐5. J Pediatr Surg. 2005; 40: 208 – 212.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRitchey ML, Kelalis P, Breslow N, et al. Surgical complications after nephrectomy for Wilms tumor. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1992; 175: 507 – 514.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRitchey ML, Shamberger RC, Haase G, Horwitz J, Bergemann TL. Surgical complications after primary nephrectomy for Wilms’ tumor: Report from the National Wilms’ Tumor Study Group. J Am Col Surg. 2001; 192: 63 – 68.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShamberger RC, Guthrie KA, Ritchey ML, et al. Surgery related factors and local reccurance of Wilms tumor in the National Wilms Tumor Study 4. Ann Surg. 1999; 229: 292 – 297.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMullen E, Geller JI, Ehrlich PF, Dome JS, Perlman EJ, Khanna G. Real Time Central Review and Risk Stratification is feasible improves study quality and risk based therapy. A report from the Children’s Oncology Group (COG) Renal Tumor Biology and Risk Stratifications Protocol ARENO3B2. J Clin Oncol. 2014; 32 ( 15 ): 10000.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMullen E, Geller JI, Ehrlich PF, Dome JS, Perlman EJ, Khanna G. First 4000 patients on Children’s Oncology Group (COG) Renal Tumor (RT) risk stratification and biology protocol AREN03B2. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2014; 61 ( S2 ): S166.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFuchs J, Kienecker K, Furtwängler R, et al. Surgical aspects in the treatment of patients with unilateral Wilms tumor: A report from the SIOP 93‐01/German Society of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology. Ann Surg. 2009; 249: 666 – 671.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrundy PE, Dome JS, Ehrlich PF, Perlman EP. Renal tumors classification, biology and banking studies. 2012: 18 – 33. https://members.childrensoncologygroup.org/Prot/AREN03B2/AREN03B2DOC.pdf. Accessed April, 2015.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRitchey ML, Lally KP, Haase GM, Shochat SJ, Kelalis PP. Superior mesenteric artery injury during nephrectomy for Wilms’ tumor. J Pediatr Surg. 1992; 27: 612 – 615.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEhrlich PF, Ferrer FA, Ritchey ML, et al. Hepatic metastasis at diagnosis in patients with Wilms tumor is not an independent adverse prognostic factor for stage V Wilms tumor. A report from the Childrens Oncology Group/National Wilms Tumor Study Group. Ann Surg. 2009; 250: 642 – 648.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDavis JS, Ryan ML, Perez EA, Neville HL, Bronson SN, Sola JE. ECMO hospital volume and survival in congenital diaphragmatic hernia repair. J Surg Res. 2012; 178: 791 – 796.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEhrlich PF, Anderson JR, Ritchey ML, et al. Clinico‐pathologic findings predictive of relapse in children with stage iii favorable histology Wilms tumor: The importance of lymph nodes. J Clin Oncol. 2013; 31 ( 9 ): 1196 – 1201.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGreen DM, Grigoriev YA, Nan B, et al. Congestive heart failure after treatment for Wilms’ tumor: A report from the National Wilms’ Tumor Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 2001; 19: 1926 – 1934.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGreen DM, Lange JM, Peabody EM. Pregnancy outcome after treatment for Wilms tumor: A report from the National Wilms tumor long‐term follow‐up study. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28: 2824 – 2830.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGow K, Barnhart DC, Hamilton TE, et al. Primary nephrectomy and intraoperative tumor spill: Report from the children’s oncology group (cog) renal tumors committee. J Pediatr Surg. 2013; 48: 34 – 38.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReames BN, Ghaferi AA, Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB. Hospital volume and operative mortality in the modern era. Ann Surg. 2014; 260: 244 – 251.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGonzalez AA, Dimick JB, Birkmeyer JD, Ghaferi AA. Understanding the volume‐outcome effect in cardiovascular surgery: The role of failure to rescue. JAMA Surg. 2014; 149: 119 – 123.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceArca MJ, Goldin AB, Oldham KT. Optimization of care for the pediatric surgical patient: Why now ? Semin Pediatr Surg. 2015; 24: 311 – 314.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith GL, Xu Y, Shih YC, et al. Breast‐conserving surgery in older patients with invasive breast cancer: Current patterns of treatment across the United States. J Am Col Surg. 2009; 209: 425 – 433.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBirkmeyer JD, Reames BN, McCulloch P, Carr AJ, Campbell WB, Wennberg JE. Understanding of regional variation in the use of surgery. Lancet. 2013; 382: 1121 – 1129.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBickell NA, Shastri K, Fei K, et al. A tracking and feedback registry to reduce racial disparities in breast cancer care. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008; 100: 1717 – 1723.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNewgard CD, Fildes JJ, Wu L, et al. Methodology and analytic rationale for the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg. 2013; 216: 147 – 157.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShafi S, Nathens AB, Cryer HG, et al. The trauma quality improvement program of the American college of surgeons committee on trauma. J Am Coll Surg. 2009; 209: 521 – 530.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBirkmeyer JD, Dimick JB, Birkmeyer NJ. Measuring the quality of surgical care: Structure, process, or outcomes ? J Am Coll Surg. 2004; 198: 626 – 632.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCooperberg MR, Birkmeyer JD, Litwin MS. Defining high quality health care. Urol Oncol. 2009; 27: 411 – 416.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceClavien PA. Targeting quality in surgery. Ann Surg. 2013; 258: 659 – 668.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKhuri SF, Daley J, Henderson W, et al. Risk adjustment of the postoperative mortality rate for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care: Results of the national veterans affairs surgical risk study. J Am Coll Surg. 1997; 185: 315 – 327.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.