Show simple item record

Developing educational competencies for dissemination and implementation research training programs: an exploratory analysis using card sorts

dc.contributor.authorPadek, Margaret
dc.contributor.authorColditz, Graham
dc.contributor.authorDobbins, Maureen
dc.contributor.authorKoscielniak, Nikolas
dc.contributor.authorProctor, Enola K
dc.contributor.authorSales, Anne E
dc.contributor.authorBrownson, Ross C
dc.date.accessioned2016-12-05T10:51:16Z
dc.date.available2016-12-05T10:51:16Z
dc.date.issued2015-08-12
dc.identifier.citationImplementation Science. 2015 Aug 12;10(1):114
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0304-3
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/134647
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background With demand increasing for dissemination and implementation (D&I) training programs in the USA and other countries, more structured, competency-based, and tested curricula are needed to guide training programs. There are many benefits to the use of competencies in practice-based education such as the establishment of rigorous standards as well as providing an additional metrics for development and growth. As the first aim of a D&I training grant, an exploratory study was conducted to establish a new set of D&I competencies to guide training in D&I research. Methods Based upon existing D&I training literature, the leadership team compiled an initial list of competencies. The research team then engaged 16 additional colleagues in the area of D&I science to provide suggestions to the initial list. The competency list was then additionally narrowed to 43 unique competencies following feedback elicited from these D&I researchers. Three hundred additional D&I researchers were then invited via email to complete a card sort in which the list of competencies were sorted into three categories of experience levels. Participants had previous first-hand experience with D&I or knowledge translation training programs in the past. Participants reported their self-identified D&I expertise level as well as the country in which their home institution is located. A mean score was calculated for each competency based on their experience level categorization. From these mean scores, beginner-, intermediate-, and advanced-level tertiles were created for the competencies. Results The card sort request achieved a 41 % response rate (n = 124). The list of 43 competencies was organized into four broad domains and sorted based on their experience level score. Eleven competencies were classified into the “Beginner” category, 27 into “Intermediate,” and 5 into “Advanced.” Conclusions Education and training developers can use this competency list to formalize future trainings in D&I research, create more evidence-informed curricula, and enable overall capacity building and accompanying metrics in the field of D&I training and research.
dc.titleDeveloping educational competencies for dissemination and implementation research training programs: an exploratory analysis using card sorts
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/134647/1/13012_2015_Article_304.pdf
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderPadek et al.
dc.date.updated2016-12-05T10:51:17Z
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.