Show simple item record

Working at the Landscape Scale: Lessons from the Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Planning Process

dc.contributor.authorBengtson, Anna
dc.contributor.authorCudmore, Alyssa
dc.contributor.authorFadie, Brian
dc.contributor.authorMarkowitz, David
dc.contributor.advisorYaffee, Steven
dc.date.accessioned2016-12-08T15:23:58Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONen_US
dc.date.available2016-12-08T15:23:58Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.date.submitted2016
dc.identifier283en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/134686
dc.description.abstractThe state of California has one of the most aggressive renewable energy portfolio standards in the country with a goal of renewable energy sources supplying 50 percent of utility retail sales by 2030. At the same time, the Department of Interior has a goal of producing 20,000 megawatts of clean energy from public lands by 2020. The Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan (DRECP) was a 22.5 million acre joint federal-state planning effort by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, California Energy Commission, and California Department of Fish and Wildlife to streamline the permitting process for renewable energy projects proposed in the California desert while allowing for the conservation and improvement of ecological and social resources. Due to its geographic scale and level of governmental and stakeholder collaboration, the DRECP was one of the most ambitious attempts at landscape-scale planning to date. As a requirement for the University of Michigan’s School of Natural Resources and Environment (SNRE) Capstone Master’s Project, four SNRE students performed an evaluation of the six-year planning process that created the Draft DRECP. Drawing from data collected from over 60 interviews of individuals involved, this report analyzes the six-year process by which the Draft DRECP was created to produce a series of lessons learned. These lessons are categorized by major elements of the process, including (1) Governance Structure, (2) Science and Analysis, (3) Public and Stakeholder Engagement, and (4) Tribal Consultation. The report concludes by making a series of recommendations for future landscape-scale planning processes.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectstakeholder engagementen_US
dc.subjectlandscape planningen_US
dc.subjectCaliforniaen_US
dc.titleWorking at the Landscape Scale: Lessons from the Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Planning Processen_US
dc.typeProjecten_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenameMaster of Science (MS)en_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineNatural Resources and Environmenten_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberna, na
dc.identifier.uniqnamebengtsaen_US
dc.identifier.uniqnameacudmoreen_US
dc.identifier.uniqnamebfadieen_US
dc.identifier.uniqnamedcmarkowitzen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/134686/1/SNRE_DRECP_Final_081816.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.