Using large eddy simulations to reveal the size, strength, and phase of updraft and downdraft cores of an Arctic mixed‐phase stratocumulus cloud
Roesler, Erika L.; Posselt, Derek J.; Rood, Richard B.
2017-04-27
View/ Open
Citation
Roesler, Erika L.; Posselt, Derek J.; Rood, Richard B. (2017). "Using large eddy simulations to reveal the size, strength, and phase of updraft and downdraft cores of an Arctic mixed‐phase stratocumulus cloud." Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 122(8): 4378-4400.
Abstract
Three‐dimensional large eddy simulations (LES) are used to analyze a springtime Arctic mixed‐phase stratocumulus observed on 26 April 2008 during the Indirect and Semi‐Direct Aerosol Campaign. Two subgrid‐scale turbulence parameterizations are compared. The first scheme is a 1.5‐order turbulent kinetic energy (1.5‐TKE) parameterization that has been previously applied to boundary layer cloud simulations. The second scheme, Cloud Layers Unified By Binormals (CLUBB), provides higher‐order turbulent closure with scale awareness. The simulations, in comparisons with observations, show that both schemes produce the liquid profiles within measurement variability but underpredict ice water mass and overpredict ice number concentration. The simulation using CLUBB underpredicted liquid water path more than the simulation using the 1.5‐TKE scheme, so the turbulent length scale and horizontal grid box size were increased to increase liquid water path and reduce dissipative energy. The LES simulations show this stratocumulus cloud to maintain a closed cellular structure, similar to observations. The updraft and downdraft cores self‐organize into a larger meso‐γ‐scale convective pattern with the 1.5‐TKE scheme, but the cores remain more isotropic with the CLUBB scheme. Additionally, the cores are often composed of liquid and ice instead of exclusively containing one or the other. These results provide insight into traditionally unresolved and unmeasurable aspects of an Arctic mixed‐phase cloud. From analysis, this cloud’s updraft and downdraft cores appear smaller than other closed‐cell stratocumulus such as midlatitude stratocumulus and Arctic autumnal mixed‐phase stratocumulus due to the weaker downdrafts and lower precipitation rates.Plain Language SummaryLow‐lying clouds in the Arctic are ubiquitous and important to understand for the near‐surface energy balance. These clouds are difficult to measure because of the challenging environment in which they reside. High‐resolution models are tools that help fill in knowledge gaps about these clouds. In this work, we compare two different ways to represent fine motion within the cloud and see how the macrophysical properties of the cloud are affected. We found that one representation creates a more energetic cloud, and this type of cloud would exist longer than the other. We also are led to believe in these simulations that these clouds have different internal motions when compared to similar‐looking clouds formed at lower latitudes or formed in a different season in the Arctic.Key PointsTwo subgrid‐scale turbulence schemes, 1.5‐TKE and CLUBB, were compared in simulations of an Arctic mixed‐phase stratocumulus cloudComparing to observations shows that both schemes produce the liquid water profiles within measurement variability but not ice water profilesUpdraft and downdraft cores are different in size, similar in strength, and composed of both liquid and icePublisher
Project Res. Data Archive at the Natl. Cent. for Atmos. Res., Comput. and Inf. Syst. Lab Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
ISSN
2169-897X 2169-8996
Other DOIs
Types
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.