View Item 

Show simple item record

Variation in the use of advanced imaging at the time of breast cancer diagnosis in a statewide registry

dc.contributor.authorHenry, N. Lynn
dc.contributor.authorBraun, Thomas M.
dc.contributor.authorBreslin, Tara M.
dc.contributor.authorGorski, David H.
dc.contributor.authorSilver, Samuel M.
dc.contributor.authorGriggs, Jennifer J.
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-01T19:08:55Z
dc.date.available2018-09-04T15:09:23Zen
dc.date.issued2017-08-01
dc.identifier.citationHenry, N. Lynn; Braun, Thomas M.; Breslin, Tara M.; Gorski, David H.; Silver, Samuel M.; Griggs, Jennifer J. (2017). "Variation in the use of advanced imaging at the time of breast cancer diagnosis in a statewide registry." Cancer 123(15): 2975-2983.
dc.identifier.issn0008-543X
dc.identifier.issn1097-0142
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/137761
dc.publisherUS Department of Veterans Affairs
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otherCT scan
dc.subject.otherbreast cancer
dc.subject.otherPET scan
dc.subject.otherbone scan
dc.subject.othercost analysis
dc.subject.otherhealth care quality assessment
dc.subject.otherdiagnostic imaging
dc.titleVariation in the use of advanced imaging at the time of breast cancer diagnosis in a statewide registry
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Health
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelOncology and Hematology
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/137761/1/cncr30674.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/137761/2/cncr30674_am.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/cncr.30674
dc.identifier.sourceCancer
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRocque GB, Williams CP, Jackson BE, et al. Choosing Wisely: opportunities for improving value in cancer care delivery? J Oncol Pract. 2017; 13: e11 – e21.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchnipper LE, Smith TJ, Raghavan D, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology identifies five key opportunities to improve care and reduce costs: the top five list for oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2012; 30: 1715 – 1724.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKhatcheressian JL, Hurley P, Bantug E, et al. Breast cancer follow‐up and management after primary treatment: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2013; 31: 961 – 965.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGradishar WJ, Anderson BO, Balassanian R, et al. Breast cancer, version 1.2016. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2015; 13: 1475 – 1485.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePuglisi F, Follador A, Minisini AM, et al. Baseline staging tests after a new diagnosis of breast cancer: further evidence of their limited indications. Ann Oncol. 2005; 16: 263 – 266.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKasem AR, Desai A, Daniell S, Sinha P. Bone scan and liver ultrasound scan in the preoperative staging for primary breast cancer. Breast J. 2006; 12: 544 – 548.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGerber B, Seitz E, Muller H, et al. Perioperative screening for metastatic disease is not indicated in patients with primary breast cancer and no clinical signs of tumor spread. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2003; 82: 29 – 37.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKim H, Han W, Moon HG, et al. The value of preoperative staging chest computed tomography to detect asymptomatic lung and liver metastasis in patients with primary breast carcinoma. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011; 126: 637 – 641.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007; 357: 2277 – 2284.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHahn EE, Tang T, Lee JS, et al. Use of imaging for staging of early‐stage breast cancer in two integrated health care systems: adherence with a choosing wisely recommendation. J Oncol Pract. 2015; 11: e320 – e328.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKamal A, Zhang T, Power S, Marcom PK. Is advanced imaging in early‐stage breast cancer ever warranted? Reconciling clinical judgment with common quality measures. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2016; 14: 993 – 998.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSimos D, Hutton B, Clemons M. Are physicians choosing wisely when imaging for distant metastases in women with operable breast cancer? J Oncol Pract. 2015; 11: 62 – 68.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRamsey SD, Fedorenko C, Chauhan R, et al. Baseline estimates of adherence to American Society of Clinical Oncology/American Board of Internal Medicine Choosing Wisely initiative among patients with cancer enrolled with a large regional commercial health insurer. J Oncol Pract. 2015; 11: 338 – 343.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrothers JM, Kidwell KM, Brown RK, Henry NL. Incidental radiologic findings at breast cancer diagnosis and likelihood of disease recurrence. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016; 155: 395 – 403.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrennan ME, Houssami N. Evaluation of the evidence on staging imaging for detection of asymptomatic distant metastases in newly diagnosed breast cancer. Breast. 2012; 21: 112 – 123.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrol R, Grimshaw J. From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients’ care. Lancet. 2003; 362: 1225 – 1230.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRaja AS, Gupta A, Ip IK, Mills AM, Khorasani R. The use of decision support to measure documented adherence to a national imaging quality measure. Acad Radiol. 2014; 21: 378 – 383.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoldzweig CL, Orshansky G, Paige NM, et al. Electronic Health Record‐Based Interventions for Reducing Inappropriate Imaging in the Clinical Setting: A Systematic Review of the Evidence. Washington, DC: US Department of Veterans Affairs; 2015.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLitvin CB, Ornstein SM, Wessell AM, Nemeth LS, Nietert PJ. Use of an electronic health record clinical decision support tool to improve antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory infections: the ABX‐TRIP study. J Gen Intern Med. 2013; 28: 810 – 816.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMakarov DV, Soulos PR, Gold HT, et al. Regional‐level correlations in inappropriate imaging rates for prostate and breast cancers: potential implications for the Choosing Wisely campaign. JAMA Oncol. 2015; 1: 185 – 194.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
cncr30674.pdf
Size:
330.4KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
cncr30674_am.pdf
Size:
1.350MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.