Show simple item record

Enforcement Evasion Highlights Need for Better Satellite‐Based Forest Governance

dc.contributor.authorRichards, Peter
dc.contributor.authorCohn, Avery S.
dc.contributor.authorArima, Eugenio
dc.contributor.authorVanWey, Leah
dc.contributor.authorBhattarai, Nishan
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-05T18:17:49Z
dc.date.available2018-09-13T15:12:06Zen
dc.date.issued2017-07
dc.identifier.citationRichards, Peter; Cohn, Avery S.; Arima, Eugenio; VanWey, Leah; Bhattarai, Nishan (2017). "Enforcement Evasion Highlights Need for Better Satellite‐Based Forest Governance." Conservation Letters 10(4): 496-497.
dc.identifier.issn1755-263X
dc.identifier.issn1755-263X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/138285
dc.description.abstractOur recent article, “Are Brazil’s Deforesters Avoiding Detection?” demonstrated that focusing illegal deforestation enforcement on the subset of forest monitored by the flagship PRODES system has caused PRODES to capture a declining share of deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Deforesters may be purposively seeking out forests not monitored for enforcement. Addressing the problem would help Brazil maintain a cutting‐edge forest governance model worthy of transfer to other nations. Two commentaries questioned our decision to investigate solely PRODES and not additional government monitoring systems. We focused on PRODES because it is the most salient deforestation monitoring system. Other key deforestation monitoring systems are all either limited to the same monitoring footprint as PRODES, not used for enforcement, or are rarely used for measuring forest loss in the Brazilian Amazon. We do agree with the commentaries that Brazil’s new satellite monitoring protocol for greenhouse gas emissions estimation is critical progress of the type we were advocating in our original article.
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otherDeforestation
dc.subject.otherAmazon
dc.subject.otherforest monitoring
dc.subject.otherBrazil
dc.subject.otherremote sensing
dc.titleEnforcement Evasion Highlights Need for Better Satellite‐Based Forest Governance
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNatural Resources and Environment
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelBiology
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScience
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/138285/1/conl12379_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/138285/2/conl12379.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/conl.12379
dc.identifier.sourceConservation Letters
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBustamante, M.M.C., Valeriano, D. d. M., de Almeida, C. A., et al. ( 2017 ). Are Brazil deforesters avoiding detection ? Reply to Richards et al. 2016. Conserv. Lett., n/a-n/a. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12357.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBustamante, M., Roitman, I., Aide, T.M., et al. ( 2016 ). Toward an integrated monitoring framework to assess the effects of tropical forest degradation and recovery on carbon stocks and biodiversity. Glob. Change Biol., 22 ( 1 ), 92 ‐ 109.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarlow, J., Lennox, G.D., Ferreira, J., et al. ( 2016 ). Anthropogenic disturbance in tropical forests can double biodiversity loss from deforestation. Nature, 535 ( 7610 ), 144 ‐ 147.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTyukavina, A., Hansen, M.C., Potapov, P.V., et al. ( 2017 ). Types and rates of forest disturbance in Brazilian Legal Amazon, 2000‐2013. Science advances, 3, e1601047.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStokstad, E. ( 2017, May 3rd). In controversial move, Brazil may outsource Amazon deforestation monitoring. Science. Available from http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/05/controversial-move-brazil-may-outsource-amazon-deforestation-monitoring.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRichards, P., Arima, E., VanWey, L., Cohn, A., & Bhattarai, N. ( 2016 ). Are Brazil’s deforesters avoiding detection ? Conserv. Lett., n/a‐n/a. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12310.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRajão, R., Moutinho, P., & Soares, L. ( 2017 ). The Rights and Wrongs of Brazil’s Forest Monitoring Systems. Conserv. Lett., n/a-n/a. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12350.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNepstad, D., McGrath, D., Stickler, C., et al. ( 2014 ). Slowing Amazon deforestation through public policy and interventions in beef and soy supply chains. Science, 344 ( 6188 ), 1118 ‐ 1123. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1248525.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMinistry of Science and Technology of Brazil. ( 2016 ). Third National Communication of Brazil to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/natc/branc3v3.pdf. Accessed 9 June 2017.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.