View Item 

Show simple item record

Beyond Costs and Benefits: Understanding How Patients Make Health Care Decisions

dc.contributor.authorUbel, Peter A.
dc.date.accessioned2017-12-15T16:48:05Z
dc.date.available2017-12-15T16:48:05Z
dc.date.issued2010-03
dc.identifier.citationUbel, Peter A. (2010). "Beyond Costs and Benefits: Understanding How Patients Make Health Care Decisions." The Oncologist 15: 5-10.
dc.identifier.issn1083-7159
dc.identifier.issn1549-490X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/139978
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.publisherAlphaMed Press
dc.subject.otherHealth care costs
dc.subject.otherPsychology
dc.subject.otherDecision making
dc.subject.otherDoctor–patient communication
dc.titleBeyond Costs and Benefits: Understanding How Patients Make Health Care Decisions
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelHematology and Oncology
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.contributor.affiliationumVA Health Services Research & Development Center for Practice Management and Outcomes Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA; Center for Behavioral and Decision Sciences in Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA; Division of General Internal Medicine and Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/139978/1/onco0005.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1634/theoncologist.2010-S1-5
dc.identifier.sourceThe Oncologist
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMouchawar J, Byers T, Cutter G et al. A study of the relationship between family history of breast cancer and knowledge of breast cancer genetic testing prerequisites Cancer Detect Prev 1999 23 22 – 30
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmsterlaw J, Zikmund‐Fisher BJ, Fagerlin A et al. Can avoidance of complications lead to biased healthcare decisions? Judgm Decis Mak 2006 1 64 – 75
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD Kahneman, P Slovic, A Tversky, eds. Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982, 1 – 544.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTversky A, Kahneman D Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases Science 1974 185 1124 – 1131
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTversky A, Kahneman D Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability Cogn Psychol 1973 5 207 – 232
dc.identifier.citedreferenceH Simon. Bounded rationality. In J Eatwell, M Milgate, P Newman, eds. The New Palgrave: Utility and Probability, New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1990, 15 – 18.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFagerlin A, Ubel PA, Smith DM et al. Making numbers matter: Present and future research in risk communication Am J Health Behav 2007 31 suppl 1 S47 – S56
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDenes‐Raj V, Epstein S, Cole J The generality of the ratio‐bias phenomenon Pers Soc Psychol Bull 1995 21 1083 – 1092
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFagerlin A, Zikmund‐Fisher BJ, Ubel PA How making a risk estimate can change the feel of that risk: Shifting attitudes toward breast cancer risk in a general public survey Patient Educ Couns 2005 57 294 – 299
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLerman C, Lustbader E, Rimer B et al. Effects of individualized breast cancer risk counseling: A randomized trial J Natl Cancer Inst 1995 87 286 – 292
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCroyle RT, Lerman C Risk communication in genetic testing for cancer susceptibility J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1999 25 59 – 66
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDurfy SJ, Bowen DJ, McTiernan A et al. Attitudes and interest in genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility in diverse groups of women in western Washington Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1999 8 369 – 375
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFischhoff B Hindsight is not equal to foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1975 1 288 – 299
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZikmund‐Fisher BJ, Fagerlin A, Ubel PA “Is 28% good or bad?” Evaluability and preference reversals in health care decisions Med Decis Making 2004 24 142 – 148
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFagerlin A, Zikmund‐Fisher BJ, Ubel PA “If I’m better than average, then I’m OK?”: Comparative information influences beliefs about risk and benefits Patient Educ Couns 2007 69 140 – 144
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFisher B, Costantino JP, Wickerham DL et al. Tamoxifen for prevention of breast cancer: Report of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P‐1 Study J Natl Cancer Inst 1998 90 1371 – 1388
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWindschitl PD, Martin R, Flugstad AR Context and the interpretation of likelihood information: The role of intergroup comparisons on perceived vulnerability J Pers Soc Psychol 2002 82 742 – 755
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWindschitl PD Judging the accuracy of a likelihood judgment: The case of smoking risk J Behav Decis Mak 2002 15 19 – 35
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZikmund‐Fisher BJ, Fagerlin A, Keeton K et al. Does labeling prenatal screening test results as negative or positive affect a woman’s responses? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007 197 528.e1 – e6
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNeumann P, Palmer J, Abrahams D et al. Struggling with expensive new cancer therapies: A national survey of oncologists Health Aff 2009. in press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLoewenstein GF, Weber EU, Hsee CK et al. Risk as feelings Psychol Bull 2001 127 267 – 286
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFinucane ML, Alhakami A, Slovic P et al. The affect of heuristic judgments of risks and benefits J Behav Decis Mak 2000 13 1 – 17
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAR Damasio. Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain, New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1994, 1 – 312.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRottenstreich Y, Hsee CK Money, kisses, and electric shocks: On the affective psychology of risk Psychol Sci 2001 12 185 – 190
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJE LeDoux. The Emotional Brain: The Mysterious Underpinnings of Emotional Life, New York: Simon & Schuster, 1996, 1 – 384.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUbel PA Is information always a good thing? Helping patients make “good” decisions Med Care 2002 40 9 suppl V39 – V44
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUbel PA, Loewenstein G The role of decision analysis in informed consent: Choosing between intuition and systematicity Soc Sci Med 1997 44 647 – 656
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVJ Strecher, IM Rosenstock. The health belief model. In K Glanz, FM Lewis, BK Rimer, eds. Health Behavior and Education: Theory, Research, and Practice, Second Edition, San Francisco: Jossey‐Bass, 1997, 41 – 59.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ Baron. Thinking and Deciding, Second Edition, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1994, 1 – 576.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceP Ubel. Free Market Madness: Why Human Nature is at Odds with Economics—and Why it Matters, Boston: Harvard Business Press, 2009, 1 – 240.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
onco0005.pdf
Size:
57.35KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.