Comparison of ileofemoral arterial access size between noncontrast 3T MR angiography and contrast‐enhanced computed tomographic angiography in patients referred for transcatheter aortic valve replacement
dc.contributor.author | LaBounty, Troy M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Bhave, Nicole | |
dc.contributor.author | Giri, Shivraman | |
dc.contributor.author | Balter, James | |
dc.contributor.author | Conte, Antonio Hernandez | |
dc.contributor.author | Shah, Ravi | |
dc.contributor.author | Murthy, Venkatesh | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-12-15T16:48:38Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-02-01T19:56:25Z | en |
dc.date.issued | 2017-12 | |
dc.identifier.citation | LaBounty, Troy M.; Bhave, Nicole; Giri, Shivraman; Balter, James; Conte, Antonio Hernandez; Shah, Ravi; Murthy, Venkatesh (2017). "Comparison of ileofemoral arterial access size between noncontrast 3T MR angiography and contrast‐enhanced computed tomographic angiography in patients referred for transcatheter aortic valve replacement." Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 46(6): 1847-1850. | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1053-1807 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1522-2586 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/140012 | |
dc.publisher | Wiley Periodicals, Inc. | |
dc.title | Comparison of ileofemoral arterial access size between noncontrast 3T MR angiography and contrast‐enhanced computed tomographic angiography in patients referred for transcatheter aortic valve replacement | |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.rights.robots | IndexNoFollow | |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Medicine (General) | |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Health Sciences | |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/140012/1/jmri25651.pdf | |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/140012/2/jmri25651_am.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1002/jmri.25651 | |
dc.identifier.source | Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Genereux P, Webb JG, Svensson LG, et al. Vascular complications after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: insights from the PARTNER (Placement of AoRTic TraNscathetER Valve) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 60: 1043 – 1052. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Khalique OK, Kodali SK, Paradis JM, et al. Aortic annular sizing using a novel 3‐dimensional echocardiographic method: use and comparison with cardiac computed tomography. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2014; 7: 155 – 163. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Ruile P, Blanke P, Krauss T, et al. Pre‐procedural assessment of aortic annulus dimensions for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: comparison of a non‐contrast 3D MRA protocol with contrast‐enhanced cardiac dual‐source CT angiography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2016; 17: 458 – 466. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Krishnam MS, Tomasian A, Malik S, Desphande V, Laub G, Ruehm SG. Image quality and diagnostic accuracy of unenhanced SSFP MR angiography compared with conventional contrast‐enhanced MR angiography for the assessment of thoracic aortic diseases. Eur Radiol 2010; 20: 1311 – 1320. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Edelman RR, Sheehan JJ, Dunkle E, Schindler N, Carr J, Koktzoglou I. Quiescent‐interval single‐shot unenhanced magnetic resonance angiography of peripheral vascular disease: Technical considerations and clinical feasibility. Magn Reson Med 2010; 63: 951 – 958. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Leipsic J, Gurvitch R, Labounty TM, et al. Multidetector computed tomography in transcatheter aortic valve implantation. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2011; 4: 416 – 429. | |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.