View Item 

Show simple item record

2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: Executive summary

dc.contributor.authorCalkins, Hugh
dc.contributor.authorHindricks, Gerhard
dc.contributor.authorCappato, Riccardo
dc.contributor.authorKim, Young‐hoon
dc.contributor.authorSaad, Eduardo B.
dc.contributor.authorAguinaga, Luis
dc.contributor.authorAkar, Joseph G.
dc.contributor.authorBadhwar, Vinay
dc.contributor.authorBrugada, Josep
dc.contributor.authorCamm, John
dc.contributor.authorChen, Peng‐sheng
dc.contributor.authorChen, Shih‐ann
dc.contributor.authorChung, Mina K.
dc.contributor.authorNielsen, Jens Cosedis
dc.contributor.authorCurtis, Anne B.
dc.contributor.authorDavies, D. Wyn
dc.contributor.authorDay, John D.
dc.contributor.authorD’avila, André
dc.contributor.authorde Groot, N.M.S. (Natasja)
dc.contributor.authorDi Biase, Luigi
dc.contributor.authorDuytschaever, Mattias
dc.contributor.authorEdgerton, James R.
dc.contributor.authorEllenbogen, Kenneth A.
dc.contributor.authorEllinor, Patrick T.
dc.contributor.authorErnst, Sabine
dc.contributor.authorFenelon, Guilherme
dc.contributor.authorGerstenfeld, Edward P.
dc.contributor.authorHaines, David E.
dc.contributor.authorHaissaguerre, Michel
dc.contributor.authorHelm, Robert H.
dc.contributor.authorHylek, Elaine
dc.contributor.authorJackman, Warren M.
dc.contributor.authorJalife, Jose
dc.contributor.authorKalman, Jonathan M.
dc.contributor.authorKautzner, Josef
dc.contributor.authorKottkamp, Hans
dc.contributor.authorKuck, Karl Heinz
dc.contributor.authorKumagai, Koichiro
dc.contributor.authorLee, Richard
dc.contributor.authorLewalter, Thorsten
dc.contributor.authorLindsay, Bruce D.
dc.contributor.authorMacle, Laurent
dc.contributor.authorMansour, Moussa
dc.contributor.authorMarchlinski, Francis E.
dc.contributor.authorMichaud, Gregory F.
dc.contributor.authorNakagawa, Hiroshi
dc.contributor.authorNatale, Andrea
dc.contributor.authorNattel, Stanley
dc.contributor.authorOkumura, Ken
dc.contributor.authorPacker, Douglas
dc.contributor.authorPokushalov, Evgeny
dc.contributor.authorReynolds, Matthew R.
dc.contributor.authorSanders, Prashanthan
dc.contributor.authorScanavacca, Mauricio
dc.contributor.authorSchilling, Richard
dc.contributor.authorTondo, Claudio
dc.contributor.authorTsao, Hsuan‐ming
dc.contributor.authorVerma, Atul
dc.contributor.authorWilber, David J.
dc.contributor.authorYamane, Teiichi
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-05T16:48:38Z
dc.date.available2018-12-03T15:34:05Zen
dc.date.issued2017-10
dc.identifier.citationCalkins, Hugh; Hindricks, Gerhard; Cappato, Riccardo; Kim, Young‐hoon ; Saad, Eduardo B.; Aguinaga, Luis; Akar, Joseph G.; Badhwar, Vinay; Brugada, Josep; Camm, John; Chen, Peng‐sheng ; Chen, Shih‐ann ; Chung, Mina K.; Nielsen, Jens Cosedis; Curtis, Anne B.; Davies, D. Wyn; Day, John D.; D’avila, André ; de Groot, N.M.S. (Natasja); Di Biase, Luigi; Duytschaever, Mattias; Edgerton, James R.; Ellenbogen, Kenneth A.; Ellinor, Patrick T.; Ernst, Sabine; Fenelon, Guilherme; Gerstenfeld, Edward P.; Haines, David E.; Haissaguerre, Michel; Helm, Robert H.; Hylek, Elaine; Jackman, Warren M.; Jalife, Jose; Kalman, Jonathan M.; Kautzner, Josef; Kottkamp, Hans; Kuck, Karl Heinz; Kumagai, Koichiro; Lee, Richard; Lewalter, Thorsten; Lindsay, Bruce D.; Macle, Laurent; Mansour, Moussa; Marchlinski, Francis E.; Michaud, Gregory F.; Nakagawa, Hiroshi; Natale, Andrea; Nattel, Stanley; Okumura, Ken; Packer, Douglas; Pokushalov, Evgeny; Reynolds, Matthew R.; Sanders, Prashanthan; Scanavacca, Mauricio; Schilling, Richard; Tondo, Claudio; Tsao, Hsuan‐ming ; Verma, Atul; Wilber, David J.; Yamane, Teiichi (2017). "2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: Executive summary." Journal of Arrhythmia 33(5): 369-409.
dc.identifier.issn1880-4276
dc.identifier.issn1883-2148
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/142234
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otherSurgical ablation
dc.subject.otherStroke
dc.subject.otherAnticoagulation
dc.subject.otherAAD
dc.subject.otherantiarrhythmic drug
dc.subject.otherAF
dc.subject.otheratrial fibrillation
dc.subject.otherAFL
dc.subject.otheratrial flutter
dc.subject.otherCB
dc.subject.othercryoballoon
dc.subject.otherCFAE
dc.subject.othercomplex fractionated atrial electrogram
dc.subject.otherLA
dc.subject.otherleft atrial
dc.subject.otherLAA
dc.subject.otherleft atrial appendage
dc.subject.otherLGE
dc.subject.otherlate gadoliniumâ enhanced
dc.subject.otherLOE
dc.subject.otherlevel of evidence
dc.subject.otherMRI
dc.subject.othermagnetic resonance imaging
dc.subject.otherOAC
dc.subject.otherRF
dc.subject.otherradiofrequency
dc.subject.otheroral anticoagulation
dc.subject.otherAblation
dc.subject.otherArrhythmia
dc.subject.otherAtrial fibrillation
dc.subject.otherAtrial flutter
dc.subject.otherAtrial tachycardia
dc.subject.otherCatheter ablation
dc.title2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: Executive summary
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelCardiovascular Medicine
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, the National Center for Cardiovascular Research Carlos III (CNIC) and CIBERCV, Madrid, Spain
dc.contributor.affiliationotherHospital Proâ Cardiaco and Hospital Samaritano, Botafogo, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
dc.contributor.affiliationotherMontreal Heart Institute, Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
dc.contributor.affiliationotherCleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Cardiology and Intensive Care, Hospital Munichâ Thalkirchen, Munich, Germany
dc.contributor.affiliationotherSaint Louis University Medical School, St. Louis, MO
dc.contributor.affiliationotherHeart Rhythm Center, Fukuoka Sanno Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
dc.contributor.affiliationotherAsklepios Klinik St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany
dc.contributor.affiliationotherHirslanden Hospital, Department of Electrophysiology, Zurich, Switzerland
dc.contributor.affiliationotherInstitute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
dc.contributor.affiliationotherRoyal Melbourne Hospital and University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
dc.contributor.affiliationotherHeart Rhythm Institute, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK
dc.contributor.affiliationotherBoston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA
dc.contributor.affiliationotherBoston University Medical Center, Boston, MA
dc.contributor.affiliationotherHôpital Cardiologique du Hautâ Lévêque, Pessac, France
dc.contributor.affiliationotherBeaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUniversity of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
dc.contributor.affiliationotherAlbert Einstein Jewish Hospital, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
dc.contributor.affiliationotherRoyal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
dc.contributor.affiliationotherMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
dc.contributor.affiliationotherVirginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA
dc.contributor.affiliationotherThe Heart Hospital, Baylor Plano, Plano, TX
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUniversitair Ziekenhuis Gent (Ghent University Hospital), Ghent, Belgium
dc.contributor.affiliationotherAlbert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefioreâ Einstein Center for Heart & Vascular Care, Bronx, NY
dc.contributor.affiliationotherErasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
dc.contributor.affiliationotherHospital SOS Cardio, Florianopolis, SC, Brazil
dc.contributor.affiliationotherIntermountain Medical Center Heart Institute, Salt Lake City, UT
dc.contributor.affiliationotherImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUniversity at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY
dc.contributor.affiliationotherAarhus University Hospital, Skejby, Denmark
dc.contributor.affiliationotherCleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
dc.contributor.affiliationotherNational Yangâ Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
dc.contributor.affiliationotherIndiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
dc.contributor.affiliationotherSt. George’s University of London, London, United Kingdom
dc.contributor.affiliationotherCardiovascular Institute, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
dc.contributor.affiliationotherWest Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, WV
dc.contributor.affiliationotherYale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
dc.contributor.affiliationotherJohns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
dc.contributor.affiliationotherHeart Center Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
dc.contributor.affiliationotherHumanitas Research Hospital, Arrhythmias and Electrophysiology Research Center, Milan, Italy
dc.contributor.affiliationotherKorea University, Seoul, South Korea
dc.contributor.affiliationotherCentro Privado de Cardiología, Tucuman, Argentina
dc.contributor.affiliationotherIRCCS, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Milan, Italy
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
dc.contributor.affiliationotherJikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
dc.contributor.affiliationotherLoyola University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
dc.contributor.affiliationotherSouthlake Regional Health Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
dc.contributor.affiliationotherNational Yangâ Ming University Hospital, Yilan City, Taiwan
dc.contributor.affiliationotherCardiac Arrhythmia Research Center, Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
dc.contributor.affiliationotherBarts Heart Centre, London, United Kingdom
dc.contributor.affiliationotherInstituto do Coração (InCor), São Paulo, Brazil
dc.contributor.affiliationotherCentre for Heart Rhythm Disorders, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, University of Adelaide and Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
dc.contributor.affiliationotherLahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA
dc.contributor.affiliationotherState Research Institute of Circulation Pathology, Novosibirsk, Russia
dc.contributor.affiliationotherMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDivision of Cardiology, Saiseikai Kumamoto Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan
dc.contributor.affiliationotherMontreal Heart Institute and Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada, McGill University, Montreal, Canada, and University Duisburgâ Essen, Essen, Germany
dc.contributor.affiliationotherTexas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute, St. David’s Medical Center, Austin, TX
dc.contributor.affiliationotherHeart Rhythm Institute, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK
dc.contributor.affiliationotherBrigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
dc.contributor.affiliationotherHospital of the University of Pennsylvania, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
dc.contributor.affiliationotherMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142234/1/joa3369.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.joa.2017.08.001
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Arrhythmia
dc.identifier.citedreferenceK. Thygesen, et al. Universal definition of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007; 50 (22): 2173 â 2195.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceF. Gaita, et al. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a cause of silent thromboembolism? Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of cerebral thromboembolism in patients undergoing ablation of atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2010; 122 (17): 1667 â 1673.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ.W. Schrickel, et al. Incidence and predictors of silent cerebral embolism during pulmonary vein catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2010; 12 (1): 52 â 57.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceT. Deneke, et al. Postablation asymptomatic cerebral lesions: longâ term followâ up using magnetic resonance imaging. Heart Rhythm. 2011; 8 (11): 1705 â 1711.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceL.D. Sauren, et al. Transcranial measurement of cerebral microembolic signals during endocardial pulmonary vein isolation: comparison of three different ablation techniques. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2009; 20 (10): 1102 â 1107.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM. Wieczorek, et al. Investigation into causes of abnormal cerebral MRI findings following PVAC dutyâ cycled, phased RF ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013; 24 (2): 121 â 128.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM. Bendszus, G. Stoll. Silent cerebral ischaemia: hidden fingerprints of invasive medical procedures. Lancet Neurol. 2006; 5 (4): 364 â 372.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR.W. Kruis, F.A. Vlasveld, D. Van Dijk. The (un)importance of cerebral microemboli. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2010; 14 (2): 111 â 118.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceC. Medi, et al. Subtle postâ procedural cognitive dysfunction after atrial fibrillation ablation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 62 (6): 531 â 539.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceH. Ichiki, et al. The incidence of asymptomatic cerebral microthromboembolism after atrial fibrillation ablation: comparison of warfarin and dabigatran. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2013; 36 (11): 1328 â 1335.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceE. Nagyâ Balo, et al. Transcranial measurement of cerebral microembolic signals during pulmonary vein isolation: a comparison of two ablation techniques. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013; 6 (3): 473 â 480.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS.E. Vermeer, et al. Silent brain infarcts and the risk of dementia and cognitive decline. N Engl J Med. 2003; 348 (13): 1215 â 1222.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceK. Neven, et al. Fatal end of a safety algorithm for pulmonary vein isolation with use of highâ intensity focused ultrasound. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2010; 3 (3): 260 â 265.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceK.L. Ripley, et al. Time course of esophageal lesions after catheter ablation with cryothermal and radiofrequency ablation: implication for atrioâ esophageal fistula formation after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2007; 18 (6): 642 â 646.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceH. Ahmed, et al. The esophageal effects of cryoenergy during cryoablation for atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2009; 6 (7): 962 â 969.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR. Kawasaki, et al. Atrioesophageal fistula complicating cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014; 25 (7): 787 â 792.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceH.W. Lim, et al. Atrioesophageal fistula during cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014; 25 (2): 208 â 213.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceK. Yokoyama, et al. Canine model of esophageal injury and atrialâ esophageal fistula after applications of forwardâ firing highâ intensity focused ultrasound and sideâ firing unfocused ultrasound in the left atrium and inside the pulmonary vein. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2009; 2 (1): 41 â 49.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS.M. Singh, et al. Esophageal injury and temperature monitoring during atrial fibrillation ablation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2008; 1 (3): 162 â 168.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceT. Kuwahara, et al. Safe and effective ablation of atrial fibrillation: importance of esophageal temperature monitoring to avoid periesophageal nerve injury as a complication of pulmonary vein isolation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2009; 20 (1): 1 â 6.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceF.M. Contrerasâ Valdes, et al. Severity of esophageal injury predicts time to healing after radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2011; 8 (12): 1862 â 1868.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceL.R. Leite, et al. Luminal esophageal temperature monitoring with a deflectable esophageal temperature probe and intracardiac echocardiography may reduce esophageal injury during atrial fibrillation ablation procedures: results of a pilot study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2011; 4 (2): 149 â 156.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceC.M. Tschabrunn, et al. Comparison between singleâ and multiâ sensor oesophageal temperature probes during atrial fibrillation ablation: thermodynamic characteristics. Europace. 2015; 17 (6): 891 â 897.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceT. Deneke, et al. Utility of esophageal temperature monitoring during pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation using dutyâ cycled phased radiofrequency ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2011; 22 (3): 255 â 261.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceB.J. Carroll, et al. Multiâ sensor esophageal temperature probe used during radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation is associated with increased intraluminal temperature detection and increased risk of esophageal injury compared to singleâ sensor probe. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013; 24 (9): 958 â 964.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceP. Muller, et al. Higher incidence of esophageal lesions after ablation of atrial fibrillation related to the use of esophageal temperature probes. Heart Rhythm. 2015; 12 (7): 1464 â 1469.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceT. Tsuchiya, et al. Atrial fibrillation ablation with esophageal cooling with a cooled waterâ irrigated intraesophageal balloon: a pilot study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2007; 18 (2): 145 â 150.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM.S. Arruda, et al. Feasibility and safety of using an esophageal protective system to eliminate esophageal thermal injury: implications on atrialâ esophageal fistula following AF ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2009; 20 (11): 1272 â 1278.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceT. Kuwahara, et al. Oesophageal cooling with ice water does not reduce the incidence of oesophageal lesions complicating catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: randomized controlled study. Europace. 2014; 16 (6): 834 â 839.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceT. Kuwahara, et al. Incidences of esophageal injury during esophageal temperature monitoring: a comparative study of a multiâ thermocouple temperature probe and a deflectable temperature probe in atrial fibrillation ablation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2014; 39 (3): 251 â 257.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA. Chugh, et al. Mechanical displacement of the esophagus in patients undergoing left atrial ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2009; 6 (3): 319 â 322.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ.S. Koruth, et al. Mechanical esophageal displacement during catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2012; 23 (2): 147 â 154.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS. Zellerhoff, F. Lenze, L. Eckardt. Prophylactic proton pump inhibition after atrial fibrillation ablation: is there any evidence?. Europace. 2011; 13 (9): 1219 â 1221.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS. Zellerhoff, et al. Fatal course of esophageal stenting of an atrioesophageal fistula after atrial fibrillation ablation. Heart Rhythm. 2011; 8 (4): 624 â 626.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM. Khan, et al. Medical treatments in the short term management of reflux oesophagitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007; (2): CD003244.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceP.J. Kahrilas. Clinical practice. Gastroesophageal reflux disease. N Engl J Med. 2008; 359 (16): 1700 â 1707.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceN.J. Shaheen, et al. Pantoprazole reduces the size of postbanding ulcers after variceal band ligation: a randomized, controlled trial. Hepatology. 2005; 41 (3): 588 â 594.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceU. Halm, et al. Thermal esophageal lesions after radiofrequency catheter ablation of left atrial arrhythmias. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010; 105 (3): 551 â 556.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceH. Knopp, et al. Incidental and ablationâ induced findings during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in patients after ablation of atrial fibrillation: a retrospective study of 425 patients. Heart Rhythm. 2014; 11 (4): 574 â 578.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceN. Dagres, et al. Rapid detection and successful treatment of esophageal perforation after radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation: lessons from five cases. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2006; 17 (11): 1213 â 1215.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceC. Eitel, et al. Successful nonsurgical treatment of esophagopericardial fistulas after atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: a case series. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013; 6 (4): 675 â 681.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceW. Hazell, et al. Atrioâ oesophageal fistula: an emergent complication of radiofrequency ablation. Emerg Med Australas. 2009; 21 (4): 329 â 332.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA. Cazavet, et al. Successful surgery for atrioesophageal fistula caused by transcatheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010; 140 (3): e43 â e45.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceE. Podgaetz, C. Deschamps. Esophageal complications of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: a case report. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013; 145 (1): e9 â e13.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceL. Queneherve, et al. Endoscopic management of an esophagopericardial fistula after radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation. World J Gastroenterol. 2013; 19 (21): 3352 â 3353.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM.F. Gunes, et al. Ablating the posterior heart: cardioesophageal fistula complicating radiofrequency ablation in the coronary sinus. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015; 26 (12): 1376 â 1378.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM.A. Qadeer, et al. Endoscopic clips for closing esophageal perforations: case report and pooled analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007; 66 (3): 605 â 611.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceC.R. Ellis, et al. Successful treatment of esophageal perforation following atrial fibrillation ablation with a fully covered esophageal stent: prevention of atrialâ esophageal fistula. J Innov Cardiac Rhythm Management. 2012; 3: 874 â 878.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS.R. Markar, et al. Novel multimodality endoscopic closure of postoperative esophageal fistula. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2012; 3 (11): 577 â 579.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ.G. Andrade, et al. Efficacy and safety of cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review of published studies. Heart Rhythm. 2011; 8 (9): 1444 â 1451.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA. Deshmukh, et al. Inâ hospital complications associated with catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in the United States between 2000 and 2010: analysis of 93 801 procedures. Circulation. 2013; 128 (19): 2104 â 2112.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR. Cappato, et al. Delayed cardiac tamponade after radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a worldwide report. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 58 (25): 2696 â 2697.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceO.J. Eick, B. Gerritse, B. Schumacher. Popping phenomena in temperatureâ controlled radiofrequency ablation: when and why do they occur?. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2000; 23 (2): 253 â 258.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ.D. Fisher, et al. Internal transcardiac pericardiocentesis for acute tamponade. Am J Cardiol. 2000; 86 (12): 1388 â 1389, A6.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceL.F. Hsu, et al. Transcardiac pericardiocentesis: an emergency lifeâ saving technique for cardiac tamponade. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2003; 14 (9): 1001 â 1003.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceT.J. Bunch, et al. Outcomes after cardiac perforation during radiofrequency ablation of the atrium. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005; 16 (11): 1172 â 1179.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceL.F. Hsu, et al. Incidence and prevention of cardiac tamponade complicating ablation for atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2005; 28 (Suppl 1): S106 â S109.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceY. Michowitz, et al. Effects of sex on the incidence of cardiac tamponade after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: results from a worldwide survey in 34 943 atrial fibrillation ablation procedures. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014; 7 (2): 274 â 280.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceT.S. Tsang, et al. Consecutive 1127 therapeutic echocardiographically guided pericardiocenteses: clinical profile, practice patterns, and outcomes spanning 21 years. Mayo Clin Proc. 2002; 77 (5): 429 â 436.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM.D. O׳Neill, et al. Two techniques to avoid surgery for cardiac tamponade occurring during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2008; 19 (3): 323 â 325.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceY. Takahashi, et al. Acute occlusion of the left circumflex coronary artery during mitral isthmus linear ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005; 16 (10): 1104 â 1107.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA. Chugh, et al. Manifestations of coronary arterial injury during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation and related arrhythmias. Heart Rhythm. 2013; 10 (11): 1638 â 1645.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceH. Makimoto, et al. Aborted sudden cardiac death due to radiofrequency ablation within the coronary sinus and subsequent total occlusion of the circumflex artery. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013; 24 (8): 929 â 932.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceT. Kitamura, et al. Transient sinus node dysfunction following sinus node artery occlusion due to radiofrequency catheter ablation of the septal superior vena cavaâ right atrium junction. J Electrocardiol. 2016; 49 (1): 18 â 22.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS. Ouali, et al. Acute coronary occlusion during radiofrequency catheter ablation of typical atrial flutter. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2002; 13 (10): 1047 â 1049.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA. Mykytsey, et al. Right coronary artery occlusion during RF ablation of typical atrial flutter. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010; 21 (7): 818 â 821.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceC. Sticherling, O. Pfister, S. Osswald. Thromboâ embolic occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery complicating left atrial radiofrequency ablation. Europace. 2009; 11 (1): 117 â 118.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceK.C. Wong, et al. High incidence of acute subâ clinical circumflex artery â injury׳ following mitral isthmus ablation. Eur Heart J. 2011; 32 (15): 1881 â 1890.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceG. Fayad, et al. Circumflex artery stenosis induced by intraoperative radiofrequency ablation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003; 76 (4): 1291 â 1293.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ.P. Piccini, et al. Outcomes of Medicare beneficiaries undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2012; 126 (18): 2200 â 2207.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD. Lakkireddy, et al. Effect of atrial fibrillation ablation on gastric motility: the atrial fibrillation gut study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015; 8 (3): 531 â 536.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ.M. Dumonceau, et al. Acute delayed gastric emptying after ablation of atrial fibrillation: treatment with botulinum toxin injection. Endoscopy. 2006; 38 (5): 543.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceT.J. Bunch, et al. Vagus nerve injury after posterior atrial radiofrequency ablation. Heart Rhythm. 2008; 5 (9): 1327 â 1330.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceT. Kuwahara, et al. Clinical characteristics and management of periesophageal vagal nerve injury complicating left atrial ablation of atrial fibrillation: lessons from eleven cases. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013; 24 (8): 847 â 851.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS. Miyazaki, et al. Factors associated with periesophageal vagal nerve injury after pulmonary vein antrum isolation. J Am Heart Assoc. 2014; 3 (5): e001209.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceN. Chopra, A. Shadchehr. Achalasia cardia as a unique complication of pulmonary vein isolation. Heart Rhythm. 2014; 11 (12): 2297 â 2299.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceT.W. Schwartz, et al. Pancreaticâ polypeptide response to food in duodenalâ ulcer patients before and after vagotomy. Lancet. 1976; 1 (7969): 1102 â 1105.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceW. Ajaj, et al. Real time high resolution magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of gastric motility disorders. Gut. 2004; 53 (9): 1256 â 1261.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceC.F. Pisani, et al. Gastric hypomotility following epicardial vagal denervation ablation to treat atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2008; 19 (2): 211 â 213.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceT. Kanaeda, et al. Evaluation of periesophageal nerve injury after pulmonary vein isolation using the (13)Câ acetate breath test. J Arrhythm. 2015; 31 (6): 364 â 370.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceL.W. Lo, et al. A novel findingâ impairment of gastric myoelectricity after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Circ J. 2013; 77 (8): 2014 â 2023.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ. Janssens, et al. Improvement of gastric emptying in diabetic gastroparesis by erythromycin. Preliminary studies. N Engl J Med. 1990; 322 (15): 1028 â 1031.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM.P. Jones, K. Maganti. A systematic review of surgical therapy for gastroparesis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003; 98 (10): 2122 â 2129.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR. Tavernier, M. Duytschaever, Y. Taeymans. Fracture of a circular mapping catheter after entrapment in the mitral valve apparatus during segmental pulmonary vein isolation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2003; 26 (8): 1774 â 1775.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR. Grove, et al. Demand for open heart surgery due to entrapment of a circular mapping catheter in the mitral valve in a patient undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation. Clin Res Cardiol. 2008; 97 (9): 628 â 629.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD. Lakkireddy, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with mitral or aortic mechanical prosthetic valves: a feasibility, safety, and efficacy study. Heart Rhythm. 2011; 8 (7): 975 â 980.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceH.M. Zeljko, et al. Entrapment of the circular mapping catheter in the mitral valve in two patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation. Europace. 2011; 13 (1): 132 â 133.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceC.V. Desimone, et al. Catheter ablation related mitral valve injury: the importance of early recognition and rescue mitral valve repair. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014; 25 (9): 971 â 975.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceO. Gurbuz, et al. Case report: paravalvular leak as a complication of percutaneous catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014; 9: 187.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM. Mansour, et al. Successful release of entrapped circumferential mapping catheters in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2004; 1 (5): 558 â 561.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR.C. Wu, et al. Circular mapping catheter entrapment in the mitral valve apparatus: a previously unrecognized complication of focal atrial fibrillation ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2002; 13 (8): 819 â 821.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS. Deftereos, et al. Colchicine for prevention of early atrial fibrillation recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation: a randomized controlled study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 60 (18): 1790 â 1796.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS. Deftereos, et al. Colchicine for prevention of atrial fibrillation recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation: midâ term efficacy and effect on quality of life. Heart Rhythm. 2014; 11 (4): 620 â 628.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceG. Stabile, et al. Low incidence of permanent complications during catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation using openâ irrigated catheters: a multicentre registry. Europace. 2014; 16 (8): 1154 â 1159.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM. Luckie, et al. Dressler׳s syndrome following pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation. Acute Card Care. 2008; 10 (4): 234 â 235.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceT. Lambert, et al. Cardiac tamponade following pericarditis 18 days after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Clin Res Cardiol. 2010; 99 (9): 595 â 597.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS. Torihashi, et al. Two cases of delayed cardiac tamponade due to pericarditis after pulmonary vein (PV) isolation for atrial fibrillation. Intern Med. 2015; 54 (7): 791 â 796.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD.R. Kim, et al. Comparison of two different doses of single bolus steroid injection to prevent atrial fibrillation recurrence after radiofrequency catheter ablation. Yonsei Med J. 2015; 56 (2): 324 â 331.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM. Kesek, et al. Entrapment of circular mapping catheter in the mitral valve. Heart Rhythm. 2007; 4 (1): 17 â 19.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceK.H. Kuck, et al. Cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation for symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: reintervention, rehospitalization, and qualityâ ofâ life outcomes in the FIRE AND ICE trial. Eur Heart J. 2016; 37 (38): 2858 â 2865.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceH. Sohara, et al. Feasibility of the radiofrequency hot balloon catheter for isolation of the posterior left atrium and pulmonary veins for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2009; 2 (3): 225 â 232.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR.F. Evonich, D.M. Nori, D.E. Haines. Efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation with a novel hot balloon ablation catheter. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2012; 34 (1): 29 â 36.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceK.R. Chun, et al. The ׳single big cryoballoon׳ technique for acute pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a prospective observational single centre study. Eur Heart J. 2009; 30 (6): 699 â 709.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceH. Hoyt, et al. Complications arising from catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: temporal trends and predictors. Heart Rhythm. 2011; 8 (12): 1869 â 1874.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceE.N. Guhl, et al. Efficacy of cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016; 27 (4): 423 â 427.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM.J. Earley, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of arrhythmias guided by nonâ fluoroscopic catheter location: a prospective randomized trial. Eur Heart J. 2006; 27 (10): 1223 â 1229.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA.V. Sarabanda, et al. Efficacy and safety of circumferential pulmonary vein isolation using a novel cryothermal balloon ablation system. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; 46 (10): 1902 â 1912.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA. Guiot, et al. Collateral nervous damages after cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2012; 23 (4): 346 â 351.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA. Metzner, et al. The incidence of phrenic nerve injury during pulmonary vein isolation using the secondâ generation 28 mm cryoballoon. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014; 25 (5): 466 â 470.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceY. Okumura, et al. Distortion of right superior pulmonary vein anatomy by balloon catheters as a contributor to phrenic nerve injury. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2009; 20 (10): 1151 â 1157.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM. Arruda, et al. Electrical isolation of the superior vena cava: an adjunctive strategy to pulmonary vein antrum isolation improving the outcome of AF ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2007; 18 (12): 1261 â 1266.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS. Miyazaki, et al. Prevalence and clinical outcome of phrenic nerve injury during superior vena cava isolation and circumferential pulmonary vein antrum isolation using radiofrequency energy. Am Heart J. 2014; 168 (6): 846 â 853.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceP. Peichl, et al. Complications of catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia: a singleâ center experience. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014; 7 (4): 684 â 690.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceE. Wissner, et al. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with persistent left superior vena cava is associated with major intraprocedural complications. Heart Rhythm. 2010; 7 (12): 1755 â 1760.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceC.S. Elayi, et al. Left superior vena cava isolation in patients undergoing pulmonary vein antrum isolation: impact on atrial fibrillation recurrence. Heart Rhythm. 2006; 3 (9): 1019 â 1023.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceH. Liu, et al. Electrogramâ guided isolation of the left superior vena cava for treatment of atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2007; 9 (9): 775 â 780.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS. Yong Ji, et al. Phrenic nerve injury: an underrecognized and potentially preventable complication of pulmonary vein isolation using a wideâ area circumferential ablation approach. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013; 24 (10): 1086 â 1091.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceF. Franceschi, et al. Phrenic nerve monitoring with diaphragmatic electromyography during cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation: the first human application. Heart Rhythm. 2011; 8 (7): 1068 â 1071.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS. Miyazaki, et al. Prospective evaluation of bilateral diaphragmatic electromyograms during cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015; 26 (6): 622 â 628.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceB. Mondesert, et al. Clinical experience with a novel electromyographic approach to preventing phrenic nerve injury during cryoballoon ablation in atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014; 7 (4): 605 â 611.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceF. Sacher, et al. Phrenic nerve injury after atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: characterization and outcome in a multicenter study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 47 (12): 2498 â 2503.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ.G. Andrade, et al. Histopathology of cryoballoon ablationâ induced phrenic nerve injury. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014; 25 (2): 187 â 194.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceC. Pappone, et al. Circumferential radiofrequency ablation of pulmonary vein ostia: a new anatomic approach for curing atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2000; 102 (21): 2619 â 2628.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS.R. Dukkipati, et al. Pulmonary vein isolation using a visually guided laser balloon catheter: the first 200â patient multicenter clinical experience. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013; 6 (3): 467 â 472.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceE.S. Katz, et al. Surgical left atrial appendage ligation is frequently incomplete: a transesophageal echocardiograhic study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 36 (2): 468 â 471.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD. Caponi, et al. Ablation of atrial fibrillation: does the addition of threeâ dimensional magnetic resonance imaging of the left atrium to electroanatomic mapping improve the clinical outcome? A randomized comparison of Cartoâ Merge vs. Cartoâ XP threeâ dimensional mapping ablation in patients with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2010; 12 (8): 1098 â 1104.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR. Proietti, et al. Remote magnetic with openâ irrigated catheter vs. manual navigation for ablation of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and metaâ analysis. Europace. 2013; 15 (9): 1241 â 1248.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ.D. Ferguson, et al. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation without fluoroscopy using intracardiac echocardiography and electroanatomic mapping. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2009; 2 (6): 611 â 619.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceH. Calkins, et al. Radiation exposure during radiofrequency catheter ablation of accessory atrioventricular connections. Circulation. 1991; 84 (6): 2376 â 2382.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceB.D. Lindsay, et al. Radiation exposure to patients and medical personnel during radiofrequency catheter ablation for supraventricular tachycardia. Am J Cardiol. 1992; 70 (2): 218 â 223.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceP. Kovoor, et al. Risk to patients from radiation associated with radiofrequency ablation for supraventricular tachycardia. Circulation. 1998; 98 (15): 1534 â 1540.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceL. Macle, et al. Radiation exposure during radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2003; 26 (1 Pt 2): 288 â 291.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceL. Lickfett, et al. Radiation exposure during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2004; 110 (19): 3003 â 3010.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ. Ector, et al. Obesity is a major determinant of radiation dose in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007; 50 (3): 234 â 242.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ. Chen, et al. Cumulative exposure to ionizing radiation from diagnostic and therapeutic cardiac imaging procedures: a populationâ based analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010; 56 (9): 702 â 711.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceY. Khaykin, et al. CARTOâ guided vs. NavXâ guided pulmonary vein antrum isolation and pulmonary vein antrum isolation performed without 3â D mapping: effect of the 3â D mapping system on procedure duration and fluoroscopy time. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2011; 30 (3): 233 â 240.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceG. Stabile, et al. Reduced fluoroscopy exposure during ablation of atrial fibrillation using a novel electroanatomical navigation system: a multicentre experience. Europace. 2012; 14 (1): 60 â 65.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR. De Ponti, et al. Simulator training reduces radiation exposure and improves trainees׳ performance in placing electrophysiologic catheters during patientâ based procedures. Heart Rhythm. 2012; 9 (8): 1280 â 1285.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ. Waigand, et al. Percutaneous treatment of pseudoaneurysms and arteriovenous fistulas after invasive vascular procedures. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 1999; 47 (2): 157 â 164.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceT. Kleemann, et al. Development of radiation exposure in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation in Germany between 2007 and 2014: great potential to minimize radiation dosage. Clin Res Cardiol. 2016; 105 (10): 858 â 864.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD. Steven, et al. Reduced fluoroscopy during atrial fibrillation ablation: benefits of robotic guided navigation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010; 21 (1): 6 â 12.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ.P. Weiss, et al. A comparison of remote magnetic irrigated tip ablation versus manual catheter irrigated tip catheter ablation with and without force sensing feedback. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016; 27 (Suppl 1): S5 â S10.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceO. Dragusin, et al. Evaluation of a radiation protection cabin for invasive electrophysiological procedures. Eur Heart J. 2007; 28 (2): 183 â 189.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceV.Y. Reddy, et al. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation without the use of fluoroscopy. Heart Rhythm. 2010; 7 (11): 1644 â 1653.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA. Bulava, J. Hanis, M. Eisenberger. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation using zeroâ fluoroscopy technique: a randomized trial. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2015; 38 (7): 797 â 806.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceH. Cochet, et al. Atrial structure and function 5 years after successful ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation: an MRI study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014; 25 (7): 671 â 679.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD.N. Gibson, et al. Stiff left atrial syndrome after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: clinical characterization, prevalence, and predictors. Heart Rhythm. 2011; 8 (9): 1364 â 1371.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM.B. Shoemaker, et al. Left atrial hypertension after repeated catheter ablations for atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 57 (19): 1918 â 1919.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceT.D. Welch, et al. Symptomatic pulmonary hypertension with giant left atrial v waves after surgical maze procedures: evaluation by comprehensive hemodynamic catheterization. Heart Rhythm. 2013; 10 (12): 1839 â 1842.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceC. Witt, et al. Recurrent dyspnea following multiple ablations for atrial fibrillation explained by the â stiff left atrial syndromeâ . Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013; 82 (5): E747 â E749.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceL. Pilote, et al. Stiff left atrial syndrome. Can J Cardiol. 1988; 4 (6): 255 â 257.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceI.M. Khurram, et al. Association between left atrial stiffness index and atrial fibrillation recurrence in patients undergoing left atrial ablation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2016; 9 (3).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ. Kosiuk, et al. Prevalence and predictors of worsened left ventricular diastolic dysfunction after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Int J Cardiol. 2013; 168 (4): 3613 â 3615.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceH. Ghanbari, et al. Mortality and cerebrovascular events after radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2014; 11 (9): 1503 â 1511.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD. Scherr, et al. Incidence and predictors of left atrial thrombus prior to catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2009; 20 (4): 379 â 384.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceY. Liu, et al. Incidence and outcomes of cerebrovascular events complicating catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2016; 18 (9): 1357 â 1365.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceP.A. Noseworthy, et al. Risk of stroke after catheter ablation versus cardioversion for atrial fibrillation: a propensityâ matched study of 24,244 patients. Heart Rhythm. 2015; 12 (6): 1154 â 1161.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD. Patel, et al. Longâ term functional and neurocognitive recovery in patients who had an acute cerebrovascular event secondary to catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010; 21 (4): 412 â 417.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS. Kochhauser, et al. Comparison of outcomes after cardioversion or atrial fibrillation ablation in patients with differing periprocedural anticoagulation regimens. Can J Cardiol. 2014; 30 (12): 1541 â 1546.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ. Kosiuk, et al. Early cerebral thromboembolic complications after radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: incidence, characteristics, and risk factors. Heart Rhythm. 2014; 11 (11): 1934 â 1940.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceF. Abhishek, et al. Effectiveness of a strategy to reduce major vascular complications from catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2011; 30 (3): 211 â 215.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceB. Aldhoon, et al. Complications of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in a highâ volume centre with the use of intracardiac echocardiography. Europace. 2013; 15 (1): 24 â 32.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceG. Mugnai, et al. Complications in the setting of percutaneous atrial fibrillation ablation using radiofrequency and cryoballoon techniques: a singleâ center study in a large cohort of patients. Int J Cardiol. 2015; 196: 42 â 49.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceY. Murakawa, et al. Nationwide survey of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: the Japanese catheter ablation registry of atrial fibrillation (Jâ CARAF)â A report on periprocedural oral anticoagulants. J Arrhythm. 2015; 31 (1): 29 â 32.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceC. Palaniswamy, et al. Catheter ablation of postinfarction ventricular tachycardia: tenâ year trends in utilization, inâ hospital complications, and inâ hospital mortality in the United States. Heart Rhythm. 2014; 11 (11): 2056 â 2063.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD. Lakkireddy, et al. Feasibility and safety of uninterrupted rivaroxaban for periprocedural anticoagulation in patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation: results from a multicenter prospective registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014; 63 (10): 982 â 988.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceC.C. Tanakaâ Esposito, et al. Realâ time ultrasound guidance reduces total and major vascular complications in patients undergoing pulmonary vein antral isolation on therapeutic warfarin. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2013; 37 (2): 163 â 168.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA. Errahmouni, et al. Ultrasoundâ guided venous puncture in electrophysiological procedures: a safe method, rapidly learned. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2014; 37 (8): 1023 â 1028.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceH. Calkins, et al. HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert Consensus Statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for personnel, policy, procedures and followâ up. A report of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) Task Force on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2007; 4 (6): 816 â 861.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceH. Calkins, et al. 2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and followâ up, definitions, endpoints, and research trial design. Heart Rhythm. 2012; 9 (4): 632 â 696.e21.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA.K. Jacobs, J.L. Anderson, J.L. Halperin. The evolution and future of ACC/AHA clinical practice guidelines: a 30â year journey: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014; 64 (13): 1373 â 1384.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ.L. Anderson. Evolution of the ACC/AHA clinical practice guidelines in perspective: guiding the guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015; 65 (25): 2735 â 2738.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceC.T. January, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014; 64 (21): e1 â e76.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceP. Kirchhof, et al. 2016 ESC guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016; 50 (5): e1 â e88.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceP. Jais, et al. Catheter ablation versus antiarrhythmic drugs for atrial fibrillation: the A4 study. Circulation. 2008; 18 (24): 2498 â 2505.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceH. Calkins, et al. Treatment of atrial fibrillation with antiarrhythmic drugs or radiofrequency ablation: two systematic literature reviews and metaâ analyses. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2009; 2 (4): 349 â 361.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD.L. Packer, et al. Cryoballoon ablation of pulmonary veins for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: first results of the North American Arctic Front (STOP AF) pivotal trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 61 (16): 1713 â 1723.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceK.H. Kuck, et al. Cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2016; 374 (23): 2235 â 2245.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS.R. Dukkipati, et al. Pulmonary vein isolation using the visually guided laser balloon: a prospective, multicenter, and randomized comparison to standard radiofrequency ablation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015; 66 (12): 1350 â 1360.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceV.Y. Reddy, et al. Randomized, controlled trial of the safety and effectiveness of a contact forceâ sensing irrigated catheter for ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: results of the TactiCath Contact Force Ablation Catheter Study for Atrial Fibrillation (TOCCASTAR) study. Circulation. 2015; 132 (10): 907 â 915.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA. Natale, et al. Paroxysmal AF catheter ablation with a contact force sensing catheter: results of the prospective, multicenter SMARTâ AF trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014; 64 (7): 647 â 656.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD.J. Wilber, et al. Comparison of antiarrhythmic drug therapy and radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2010; 303 (4): 333 â 340.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceH. Sohara, et al. HotBalloon ablation of the pulmonary veins for paroxysmal AF: a multicenter randomized trial in Japan. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016; 68 (25): 2747 â 2757.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceC. Pappone, et al. A randomized trial of circumferential pulmonary vein ablation versus antiarrhythmic drug therapy in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: the APAF Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 48 (11): 2340 â 2347.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceG. Stabile, et al. Catheter ablation treatment in patients with drugâ refractory atrial fibrillation: a prospective, multiâ centre, randomized, controlled study (Catheter Ablation For The Cure Of Atrial Fibrillation Study). Eur Heart J. 2006; 27 (2): 216 â 221.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceG.B. Forleo, et al. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with diabetes mellitus type 2: results from a randomized study comparing pulmonary vein isolation versus antiarrhythmic drug therapy. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2009; 20 (1): 22 â 28.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA. Verma, et al. Approaches to catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2015; 372 (19): 1812 â 1822.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD. Scherr, et al. Fiveâ year outcome of catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation using termination of atrial fibrillation as a procedural endpoint. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015; 8 (1): 18 â 24.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD. Tamborero, et al. Left atrial posterior wall isolation does not improve the outcome of circumferential pulmonary vein ablation for atrial fibrillation: a prospective randomized study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2009; 2 (1): 35 â 40.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ. Hummel, et al. Phased RF ablation in persistent atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2014; 11 (2): 202 â 209.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM. Bassiouny, et al. Randomized study of persistent atrial fibrillation ablation: ablate in sinus rhythm versus ablate complexâ fractionated atrial electrograms in atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2016; 9 (2): e003596.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR. Krittayaphong, et al. A randomized clinical trial of the efficacy of radiofrequency catheter ablation and amiodarone in the treatment of symptomatic atrial fibrillation. J Med Assoc Thai. 2003; 86 (Suppl 1): S8 â S16.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceH. Oral, et al. Circumferential pulmonaryâ vein ablation for chronic atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2006; 354 (9): 934 â 941.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceL. Mont, et al. Catheter ablation vs. antiarrhythmic drug treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation: a multicentre, randomized, controlled trial (SARA study). Eur Heart J. 2014; 35 (8): 501 â 507.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceN. Calvo, et al. Efficacy of circumferential pulmonary vein ablation of atrial fibrillation in endurance athletes. Europace. 2010; 12 (1): 30 â 36.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceF. Furlanello, et al. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in athletes referred for disabling symptoms preventing usual training schedule and sport competition. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2008; 19 (5): 457 â 462.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceO.M. Wazni, et al. Radiofrequency ablation vs antiarrhythmic drugs as firstâ line treatment of symptomatic atrial fibrillation: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2005; 293 (21): 2634 â 2640.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ. Cosedis Nielsen, et al. Radiofrequency ablation as initial therapy in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2012; 367 (17): 1587 â 1595.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceC.A. Morillo, et al. Radiofrequency ablation vs antiarrhythmic drugs as firstâ line treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (RAAFTâ 2): a randomized trial. JAMA. 2014; 311 (7): 692 â 700.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA. Hakalahti, et al. Radiofrequency ablation vs antiarrhythmic drug therapy as first line treatment of symptomatic atrial fibrillation: systematic review and metaâ analysis. Europace. 2015; 17 (3): 370 â 378.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM. Hocini, et al. Reverse remodeling of sinus node function after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with prolonged sinus pauses. Circulation. 2003; 108 (10): 1172 â 1175.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceY.W. Chen, et al. Pacing or ablation: which is better for paroxysmal atrial fibrillationâ related tachycardiaâ bradycardia syndrome?. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2014; 37 (4): 403 â 411.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceK. Inada, et al. The role of successful catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and prolonged sinus pauses: outcome during a 5â year followâ up. Europace. 2014; 16 (2): 208 â 213.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM.S. Chen, et al. Pulmonary vein isolation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation in patients with impaired systolic function. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 43 (6): 1004 â 1009.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceP.J. Gentlesk, et al. Reversal of left ventricular dysfunction following ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2007; 18 (1): 9 â 14.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM.N. Khan, et al. Pulmonaryâ vein isolation for atrial fibrillation in patients with HF. N Engl J Med. 2008; 359 (17): 1778 â 1785.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM.R. MacDonald, et al. Radiofrequency ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation in patients with advanced heart failure and severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a randomised controlled trial. Heart. 2011; 97 (9): 740 â 747.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR.J. Hunter, et al. A randomized controlled trial of catheter ablation versus medical treatment of atrial fibrillation in heart failure (the CAMTAF trial). Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014; 7 (1): 31 â 38.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceC. Tondo, et al. Pulmonary vein vestibule ablation for the control of atrial fibrillation in patients with impaired left ventricular function. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2006; 29 (9): 962 â 970.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceB.A. Lutomsky, et al. Catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation improves cardiac function: a prospective study on the impact of atrial fibrillation ablation on left ventricular function assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. Europace. 2008; 10 (5): 593 â 599.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA.D. Choi, et al. Ablation vs medical therapy in the setting of symptomatic atrial fibrillation and left ventricular dysfunction. Congest Heart Fail. 2010; 16 (1): 10 â 14.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceT. De Potter, et al. Left ventricular systolic dysfunction by itself does not influence outcome of atrial fibrillation ablation. Europace. 2010; 12 (1): 24 â 29.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceY.M. Cha, et al. Success of ablation for atrial fibrillation in isolated left ventricular diastolic dysfunction: a comparison to systolic dysfunction and normal ventricular function. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2011; 4 (5): 724 â 732.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD.G. Jones, et al. A randomized trial to assess catheter ablation versus rate control in the management of persistent atrial fibrillation in HF. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 61 (18): 1894 â 1903.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceT. Machinoâ Ohtsuka, et al. Efficacy, safety, and outcomes of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 62 (20): 1857 â 1865.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS. Al Halabi, et al. Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in heart failure patients: a metaâ analysis of randomized controlled trials. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2015; 1 (3): 200 â 209.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceT.J. Bunch, et al. Fiveâ year outcomes of catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation and left ventricular systolic dysfunction. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015; 26 (4): 363 â 370.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceT.J. Lobo, et al. Atrial fibrillation ablation in systolic dysfunction: clinical and echocardiographic outcomes. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2015; 104 (1): 45 â 52.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceL.H. Ling, et al. Sinus rhythm restores ventricular function in patients with cardiomyopathy and no late gadolinium enhancement on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging who undergo catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2013; 10 (9): 1334 â 1339.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceL.F. Hsu, et al. Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in congestive HF. N Engl J Med. 2004; 351 (23): 2373 â 2383.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD.D. Spragg, et al. Complications of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: incidence and predictors. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2008; 19 (6): 627 â 631.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceF. Kusumoto, et al. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in older patients: outcomes and complications. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2009; 25 (1): 31 â 35.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceT.J. Bunch, et al. Longâ term clinical efficacy and risk of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in octogenarians. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2010; 33 (2): 146 â 152.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceP. Santangeli, et al. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in octogenarians: safety and outcomes. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2012; 23 (7): 687 â 693.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceK. Nademanee, et al. Benefits and risks of catheter ablation in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2015; 12 (1): 44 â 51.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceT.J. Bunch, et al. The impact of age on 5â year outcomes after atrial fibrillation catheter ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016; 27 (2): 141 â 146.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceI. Metzner, et al. Ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients >/=75 years: longâ term clinical outcome and safety. Europace. 2016; 18 (4): 543 â 549.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceT.J. Bunch, et al. Substrate and procedural predictors of outcomes after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2008; 19 (10): 1009 â 1014.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceI. Olivotto, et al. Impact of atrial fibrillation on the clinical course of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 2001; 104 (21): 2517 â 2524.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR. Providencia, et al. Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a systematic review and metaâ analysis. Heart. 2016; 102 (19): 1533 â 1543.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceP. Leongâ Sit, et al. Efficacy and risk of atrial fibrillation ablation before 45 years of age. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2010; 3 (5): 452 â 457.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceK.R. Chun, et al. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in the young: insights from the German Ablation Registry. Clin Res Cardiol. 2013; 102 (6): 459 â 468.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceP. Koopman, et al. Efficacy of radiofrequency catheter ablation in athletes with atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2011; 13 (10): 1386 â 1393.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceG.B. Forleo, et al. Clinical impact of catheter ablation in patients with asymptomatic atrial fibrillation: the IRONâ AF (Italian registry on NavX atrial fibrillation ablation procedures) study. Int J Cardiol. 2013; 168 (4): 3968 â 3970.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceL. Wu, et al. Comparison of radiofrequency catheter ablation between asymptomatic and symptomatic persistent atrial fibrillation: a propensity score matched analysis. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016; 27 (5): 531 â 535.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS. Mohanty, et al. Catheter ablation of asymptomatic longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation: impact on quality of life, exercise performance, arrhythmia perception, and arrhythmiaâ free survival. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014; 25 (10): 1057 â 1064.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceU.S. Food and Drug Administration. Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data: AtriCure Synergy Ablation System, PMA P100046. 2011
dc.identifier.citedreferenceV. Badhwar, et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Mitral Repair/Replacement Composite Score: a report of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Quality Measurement Task Force. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016; 101 (6): 2265 â 2271.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceC.A. Abreu Filho, et al. Effectiveness of the maze procedure using cooledâ tip radiofrequency ablation in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation and rheumatic mitral valve disease. Circulation. 2005; 112 (9 Suppl): I20 â I25.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceG. Doukas, et al. Left atrial radiofrequency ablation during mitral valve surgery for continuous atrial fibrillation: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2005; 294 (18): 2323 â 2329.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceC. Blomstromâ Lundqvist, et al. A randomized doubleâ blind study of epicardial left atrial cryoablation for permanent atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing mitral valve surgery: the SWEDish Multicentre Atrial Fibrillation study (SWEDMAF). Eur Heart J. 2007; 28 (23): 2902 â 2908.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceP. Chevalier, et al. Left atrial radiofrequency ablation during mitral valve surgery: a prospective randomized multicentre study (SAFIR). Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2009; 102 (11): 769 â 775.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD.C. Cheng, et al. Surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation in cardiac surgery: a metaâ analysis and systematic review. Innovations (Phila). 2010; 5 (2): 84 â 96.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceP. Budera, et al. Comparison of cardiac surgery with left atrial surgical ablation vs. cardiac surgery without atrial ablation in patients with coronary and/or valvular heart disease plus atrial fibrillation: final results of the PRAGUEâ 12 randomized multicentre study. Eur Heart J. 2012; 33 (21): 2644 â 2652.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceK. Phan, et al. Surgical ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation in cardiac surgery: a cumulative metaâ analysis of randomised controlled trials. Heart. 2014; 100 (9): 722 â 730.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA.M. Gillinov, et al. Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation during mitralâ valve surgery. N Engl J Med. 2015; 372 (15): 1399 â 1409.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ.S. Rankin, et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk model for operative mortality after multiple valve surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013; 95 (4): 1484 â 1490.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceY. Louagie, et al. Improved patient survival with concomitant Cox Maze III procedure compared with heart surgery alone. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009; 87 (2): 440 â 446.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceB. Chiappini, R. Di Bartolomeo, G. Marinelli. Radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation: different approaches. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2004; 12 (3): 272 â 277.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS.D. Barnett, N. Ad. Surgical ablation as treatment for the elimination of atrial fibrillation: a metaâ analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006; 131 (5): 1029 â 1035.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ.R. Edgerton, W.M. Jackman, M.J. Mack. A new epicardial lesion set for minimal access left atrial maze: the Dallas lesion set. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009; 88 (5): 1655 â 1657.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ.R. Edgerton, et al. Totally thorascopic surgical ablation of persistent AF and longâ standing persistent atrial fibrillation using the â Dallasâ lesion set. Heart Rhythm. 2009; 6 (12 Suppl): S64 â S70.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD. Lockwood, et al. Linear left atrial lesions in minimally invasive surgical ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation: techniques for assessing conduction block across surgical lesions. Heart Rhythm. 2009; 6 (12 Suppl): S50 â S63.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS.C. Malaisrie, et al. Atrial fibrillation ablation in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement. J Heart Valve Dis. 2012; 21 (3): 350 â 357.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA. Cherniavsky, et al. Assessment of results of surgical treatment for persistent atrial fibrillation during coronary artery bypass grafting using implantable loop recorders. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014; 18 (6): 727 â 731.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ.S. Yoo, et al. Impact of concomitant surgical atrial fibrillation ablation in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement. Circ J. 2014; 78 (6): 1364 â 1371.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA.H. Driessen, et al. Ganglion Plexus Ablation in Advanced Atrial Fibrillation: The AFACT Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016; 68 (11): 1155 â 1165.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceL.V. Boersma, et al. Atrial fibrillation catheter ablation versus surgical ablation treatment (FAST): a 2â center randomized clinical trial. Circulation. 2012; 125 (1): 23 â 30.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM.C. Henn, et al. Late outcomes after the Cox maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015; 150 (5): 1168 â 1176, 1178 e1â 2.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS.P. Krul, et al. Navigating the miniâ maze: systematic review of the first results and progress of minimallyâ invasive surgery in the treatment of atrial fibrillation. Int J Cardiol. 2013; 166 (1): 132 â 140.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ.L. Cox, et al. The surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation. III. Development of a definitive surgical procedure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1991; 101 (4): 569 â 583.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceE. Rodriguez, et al. Minimally invasive biâ atrial CryoMaze operation for atrial fibrillation. Oper Tech Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009; 14 (3): 208 â 223.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR.K. Wolf, et al. Videoâ assisted bilateral pulmonary vein isolation and left atrial appendage exclusion for atrial fibrillation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005; 130 (3): 797 â 802.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ.R. Edgerton, et al. Minimally invasive pulmonary vein isolation and partial autonomic denervation for surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008; 86 (1): 35 â 38, discussion 39.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ.R. Edgerton, et al. Minimally invasive surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: sixâ month results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009; 138 (1): 109 â 113, discussion 114.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceE. Beyer, R. Lee, B.K. Lam. Point: Minimally invasive bipolar radiofrequency ablation of lone atrial fibrillation: early multicenter results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009; 137 (3): 521 â 526.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceK. Kearney, et al. A systematic review of surgical ablation versus catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2014; 3 (1): 15 â 29.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceN. Ad, et al. Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation trends and outcomes in North America. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012; 144 (5): 1051 â 1060.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA.H. Driessen, et al. Electrophysiologically guided thoracoscopic surgery for advanced atrial fibrillation: 5â year followâ up. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017; 69 (13): 1753 â 1754.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceK. Khargi, et al. Surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation; a systematic review. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005; 27 (2): 258 â 265.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceO.M. Wazni, et al. Atrial arrhythmias after surgical maze: findings during catheter ablation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 48 (7): 1405 â 1409.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA.R. Magnano, et al. Mechanisms of atrial tachyarrhythmias following surgical atrial fibrillation ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2006; 17 (4): 366 â 373.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceH.T. McElderry, et al. Proarrhythmic aspects of atrial fibrillation surgery: mechanisms of postoperative macroreentrant tachycardias. Circulation. 2008; 117 (2): 155 â 162.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceP.M. McCarthy, et al. Where does atrial fibrillation surgery fail? Implications for increasing effectiveness of ablation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010; 139 (4): 860 â 867.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceY. Zeng, et al. Recurrent atrial arrhythmia after minimally invasive pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010; 90 (2): 510 â 515.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR. Lee, et al. Surgical treatment for isolated atrial fibrillation: minimally invasive vs. classic cut and sew maze. Innovations (Phila). 2011; 6 (6): 373 â 377.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceK.H. Kuck, et al. Impact of complete versus incomplete circumferential lines around the pulmonary veins during catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: results from the Gapâ Atrial Fibrillationâ German Atrial Fibrillation Competence Network 1 Trial. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2016; 9 (1): e003337.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA. Verma, et al. Response of atrial fibrillation to pulmonary vein antrum isolation is directly related to resumption and delay of pulmonary vein conduction. Circulation. 2005; 112 (5): 627 â 635.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceL. Macle, et al. Adenosineâ guided pulmonary vein isolation for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: an international, multicentre, randomised superiority trial. Lancet. 2015; 386 (9994): 672 â 679.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA. Cheema, et al. Incidence and time course of early recovery of pulmonary vein conduction after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2007; 18 (4): 387 â 391.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceK. Rajappan, et al. Acute and chronic pulmonary vein reconnection after atrial fibrillation ablation: a prospective characterization of anatomical sites. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2008; 31 (12): 1598 â 1605.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD. Bansch, et al. Circumferential pulmonary vein isolation: wait or stop early after initial successful pulmonary vein isolation?. Europace. 2013; 15 (2): 183 â 188.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceK. Nakamura, et al. Optimal observation time after completion of circumferential pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation to prevent chronic pulmonary vein reconnections. Int J Cardiol. 2013; 168 (6): 5300 â 5310.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceX.H. Wang, et al. Early identification and treatment of PV reâ connections: role of observation time and impact on clinical results of atrial fibrillation ablation. Europace. 2007; 9 (7): 481 â 486.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceW.H. Sauer, et al. Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in patients referred for atrial fibrillation ablation: response to ablation that incorporates slowâ pathway modification. Circulation. 2006; 114 (3): 191 â 195.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceY. Ninomiya, et al. Usefulness of the adenosine triphosphate with a sufficient observation period for detecting reconduction after pulmonary vein isolation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2009; 32 (10): 1307 â 1312.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceT. Yamane, et al. Repeated provocation of timeâ and ATPâ induced early pulmonary vein reconnections after pulmonary vein isolation: eliminating paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in a single procedure. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2011; 4 (5): 601 â 608.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA. Kobori, et al. Adenosine triphosphateâ guided pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation: the UNmasking Dormant Electrical Reconduction by Adenosine TriPhosphate (UNDERâ ATP) trial. Eur Heart J. 2015; 36 (46): 3276 â 3287.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceC. Pratola, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation: is the persistence of all intraprocedural targets necessary for longâ term maintenance of sinus rhythm?. Circulation. 2008; 117 (2): 136 â 143.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR.H. Jiang, et al. Incidence of pulmonary vein conduction recovery in patients without clinical recurrence after ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: mechanistic implications. Heart Rhythm. 2014; 11 (6): 969 â 976.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceT. Arentz, et al. â Dormantâ pulmonary vein conduction revealed by adenosine after ostial radiofrequency catheter ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2004; 15 (9): 1041 â 1047.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM. Tritto, et al. Adenosine restores atrioâ venous conduction after apparently successful ostial isolation of the pulmonary veins. Eur Heart J. 2004; 25 (23): 2155 â 2163.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceT. Datino, et al. Mechanisms by which adenosine restores conduction in dormant canine pulmonary veins. Circulation. 2010; 121 (8): 963 â 972.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceP.D. Dallaglio, et al. The role of adenosine in pulmonary vein isolation: a critical review. Cardiol Res Pract. 2016; 2016: 8632509.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS. Kapa, et al. Doseâ dependent pulmonary vein reconnection in response to adenosine: relevance of atrioventricular block during infusion. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2016; 47 (1): 117 â 123.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ.G. Andrade, et al. Pulmonary vein isolation using â contact forceâ ablation: the effect on dormant conduction and longâ term freedom from recurrent atrial fibrillationâ a prospective study. Heart Rhythm. 2014; 11 (11): 1919 â 1924.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceC. Eitel, et al. Circumferential pulmonary vein isolation and linear left atrial ablation as a singleâ catheter technique to achieve bidirectional conduction block: the paceâ andâ ablate approach. Heart Rhythm. 2010; 7 (2): 157 â 164.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD. Steven, et al. Loss of pace capture on the ablation line: a new marker for complete radiofrequency lesions to achieve pulmonary vein isolation. Heart Rhythm. 2010; 7 (3): 323 â 330.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ.G. Andrade, et al. Pulmonary vein isolation using a paceâ captureâ guided versus an adenosineâ guided approach: effect on dormant conduction and longâ term freedom from recurrent atrial fibrillationâ a prospective study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013; 6 (6): 1103 â 1108.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD. Steven, et al. Benefit of pulmonary vein isolation guided by loss of pace capture on the ablation line: results from a prospective 2â center randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 62 (1): 44 â 50.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceB. Schaeffer, et al. Loss of pace capture on the ablation line during pulmonary vein isolation versus â dormant conductionâ : is adenosine expendable?. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015; 26 (10): 1075 â 1080.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceE.P. Gerstenfeld, et al. Utility of exit block for identifying electrical isolation of the pulmonary veins. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2002; 13 (10): 971 â 979.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceP. Vijayaraman, et al. Assessment of exit block following pulmonary vein isolation: farâ field capture masquerading as entrance without exit block. Heart Rhythm. 2012; 9 (10): 1653 â 1659.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ.E. Ip, et al. Method for differentiating left superior pulmonary vein exit conduction from pseudoâ exit conduction. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2013; 36 (3): 299 â 308.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceP. Spector. Principles of cardiac electric propagation and their implications for reâ entrant arrhythmias. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013; 6 (3): 655 â 661.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS. Chen, et al. Blocking the pulmonary vein to left atrium conduction in addition to the entrance block enhances clinical efficacy in atrial fibrillation ablation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2012; 35 (5): 524 â 531.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ.Y. Kim, et al. Achievement of successful pulmonary vein isolation: methods of adenosine testing and incremental benefit of exit block. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2016; 46 (3): 315 â 324.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceF.J. Perez, et al. Longâ term outcomes after catheter ablation of cavoâ tricuspid isthmus dependent atrial flutter: a metaâ analysis. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2009; 2 (4): 393 â 401.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceN.J. Patel, et al. Contemporary utilization and safety outcomes of catheter ablation of atrial flutter in the United States: Analysis of 89,638 procedures. Heart Rhythm. 2016; 13 (6): 1317 â 1325.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceO. Wazni, et al. Randomized study comparing combined pulmonary veinâ left atrial junction disconnection and cavotricuspid isthmus ablation versus pulmonary veinâ left atrial junction disconnection alone in patients presenting with typical atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2003; 108 (20): 2479 â 2483.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA. Natale, et al. Prospective randomized comparison of antiarrhythmic therapy versus firstâ line radiofrequency ablation in patients with atrial flutter. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 35 (7): 1898 â 1904.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceC. Pappone, et al. Prevention of iatrogenic atrial tachycardia after ablation of atrial fibrillation: a prospective randomized study comparing circumferential pulmonary vein ablation with a modified approach. Circulation. 2004; 110 (19): 3036 â 3042.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceN. Sawhney, et al. Circumferential pulmonary vein ablation with additional linear ablation results in an increased incidence of left atrial flutter compared with segmental pulmonary vein isolation as an initial approach to ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2010; 3 (3): 243 â 248.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS. Chae, et al. Atrial tachycardia after circumferential pulmonary vein ablation of atrial fibrillation: mechanistic insights, results of catheter ablation, and risk factors for recurrence. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007; 50 (18): 1781 â 1787.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceF. Ouyang, et al. Characterization of reentrant circuits in left atrial macroreentrant tachycardia: critical isthmus block can prevent atrial tachycardia recurrence. Circulation. 2002; 105 (16): 1934 â 1942.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS. Matsuo, et al. Periâ mitral atrial flutter in patients with atrial fibrillation ablation. Heart Rhythm. 2010; 7 (1): 2 â 8.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS. Tzeis, et al. The modified anterior line: an alternative linear lesion in perimitral flutter. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010; 21 (6): 665 â 670.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS.A. Chen, C.T. Tai. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation originating from the nonâ pulmonary vein foci. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005; 16 (2): 229 â 232.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM. Haissaguerre, et al. Spontaneous initiation of atrial fibrillation by ectopic beats originating in the pulmonary veins. N Engl J Med. 1998; 339 (10): 659 â 666.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS.H. Lee, et al. Predictors of nonâ pulmonary vein ectopic beats initiating paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: implication for catheter ablation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; 46 (6): 1054 â 1059.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM.H. Hsieh, et al. Alterations of heart rate variability after radiofrequency catheter ablation of focal atrial fibrillation originating from pulmonary veins. Circulation. 1999; 100 (22): 2237 â 2243.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD. Shah, et al. Nonpulmonary vein foci: do they exist?. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2003; 26 (7 Pt 2): 1631 â 1635.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD. Lin, et al. Provocability of atrial fibrillation triggers during pulmonary vein isolation in patients with infrequent AF [abstract]. Heart Rhythm. 2004; 1 (Suppl): S231.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceL. Di Biase, et al. Left atrial appendage: an underrecognized trigger site of atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2010; 122 (2): 109 â 118.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceP. Santangeli, et al. Prevalence and distribution of focal triggers in persistent and longâ standing persistent atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2016; 13 (2): 374 â 382.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceW.S. Lin, et al. Catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation initiated by nonâ pulmonary vein ectopy. Circulation. 2003; 107 (25): 3176 â 3183.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR.J. Lee, et al. Percutaneous alternative to the Maze procedure for the treatment of persistent or longâ standing persistent atrial fibrillation (aMAZE trial): Rationale and design. Am Heart J. 2015; 170 (6): 1184 â 1194.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceY. Zhao, et al. Importance of nonâ pulmonary vein triggers ablation to achieve longâ term freedom from paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in patients with low ejection fraction. Heart Rhythm. 2016; 13 (1): 141 â 149.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS. Dixit, et al. Randomized ablation strategies for the treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation: RASTA study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012; 5 (2): 287 â 294.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceP. Neuzil, et al. Electrical reconnection after pulmonary vein isolation is contingent on contact force during initial treatment: results from the EFFICAS I study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013; 6 (2): 327 â 333.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceK. Yokoyama, et al. Novel contact force sensor incorporated in irrigated radiofrequency ablation catheter predicts lesion size and incidence of steam pop and thrombus. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2008; 1 (5): 354 â 362.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA. Ikeda, et al. Relationship between catheter contact force and radiofrequency lesion size and incidence of steam pop in the beating canine heart: electrogram amplitude, impedance, and electrode temperature are poor predictors of electrodeâ tissue contact force and lesion size. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014; 7 (6): 1174 â 1180.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceH. Nakagawa, et al. Locations of high contact force during left atrial mapping in atrial fibrillation patients: electrogram amplitude and impedance are poor predictors of electrodeâ tissue contact force for ablation of atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013; 6 (4): 746 â 753.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceH. Nakagawa, et al. Prospective study to test the ability to create RF lesions at predicted depth and diameter using a new formula incorporating contact force, radiofrequency power and application time (forceâ powerâ time index) in the beating heart [abstract]. Heart Rhythm. 2014; 11 (Suppl): S548.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS. Kumar, et al. Predictive value of impedance changes for realâ time contact force measurements during catheter ablation of atrial arrhythmias in humans. Heart Rhythm. 2013; 10 (7): 962 â 969.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS. Kumar, et al. Prospective characterization of catheterâ tissue contact force at different anatomic sites during antral pulmonary vein isolation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012; 5 (6): 1124 â 1129.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceV.Y. Reddy, et al. The relationship between contact force and clinical outcome during radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in the TOCCATA study. Heart Rhythm. 2012; 9 (11): 1789 â 1795.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS. Haldar, et al. Contact force sensing technology identifies sites of inadequate contact and reduces acute pulmonary vein reconnection: a prospective case control study. Int J Cardiol. 2013; 168 (2): 1160 â 1166.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceF. Perna, et al. Assessment of catheter tip contact force resulting in cardiac perforation in swine atria using force sensing technology. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2011; 4 (2): 218 â 224.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM. Kimura, et al. Comparison of lesion formation between contact forceâ guided and nonâ guided circumferential pulmonary vein isolation: a prospective, randomized study. Heart Rhythm. 2014; 11 (6): 984 â 991.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceC. Sohns, et al. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging analysis of the relationship between contact force and left atrial scar formation after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014; 25 (2): 138 â 145.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM. Martinek, et al. Clinical impact of an openâ irrigated radiofrequency catheter with direct force measurement on atrial fibrillation ablation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2012; 35 (11): 1312 â 1318.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceE. Marijon, et al. Realâ time contact force sensing for pulmonary vein isolation in the setting of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: procedural and 1â year results. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014; 25 (2): 130 â 137.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceE. Sigmund, et al. Optimizing radiofrequency ablation of paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation by direct catheter force measurementâ a caseâ matched comparison in 198 patients. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2015; 38 (2): 201 â 208.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceW. Ullah, et al. Randomized trial comparing pulmonary vein isolation using the SmartTouch catheter with or without realâ time contact force data. Heart Rhythm. 2016; 13 (9): 1761 â 1767.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR. Wakili, et al. Impact of realâ time contact force and impedance measurement in pulmonary vein isolation procedures for treatment of atrial fibrillation. Clin Res Cardiol. 2014; 103 (2): 97 â 106.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceK. Kumagai, et al. A new approach for complete isolation of the posterior left atrium including pulmonary veins for atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2007; 18 (10): 1047 â 1052.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceY. Yamaguchi, et al. Longâ term effects of box isolation on sympathovagal balance in atrial fibrillation. Circ J. 2010; 74 (6): 1096 â 1103.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceK. Kumagai. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. State of the Art. Circ J. 2011; 75 (10): 2305 â 2311.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ.S. Kim, et al. Does isolation of the left atrial posterior wall improve clinical outcomes after radiofrequency catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation? A prospective randomized clinical trial. Int J Cardiol. 2015; 181: 277 â 283.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceX. He, et al. Left atrial posterior wall isolation reduces the recurrence of atrial fibrillation: a metaâ analysis. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2016; 46 (3): 267 â 274.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceL. Di Biase, et al. Left atrial appendage isolation in patients with longâ standing persistent AF undergoing catheter ablation: BELIEF trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016; 68 (18): 1929 â 1940.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceL. Di Biase, et al. Ablation versus amiodarone for treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation in patients with congestive heart failure and an implanted device: results from the AATAC multicenter randomized trial. Circulation. 2016; 133 (17): 1637 â 1644.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceC.A. Morillo, et al. Chronic rapid atrial pacing. Structural, functional, and electrophysiological characteristics of a new model of sustained atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 1995; 91 (5): 1588 â 1595.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA. Harada, et al. Atrial activation during chronic atrial fibrillation in patients with isolated mitral valve disease. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996; 61 (1): 104 â 111, discussion 111â 112.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR.A. Gray, A.M. Pertsov, J. Jalife. Spatial and temporal organization during cardiac fibrillation. Nature. 1998; 392 (6671): 75 â 78.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceO. Berenfeld, et al. Spatially distributed dominant excitation frequencies reveal hidden organization in atrial fibrillation in the Langendorffâ perfused sheep heart. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2000; 11 (8): 869 â 879.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM. Mansour, et al. Leftâ toâ right gradient of atrial frequencies during acute atrial fibrillation in the isolated sheep heart. Circulation. 2001; 103 (21): 2631 â 2636.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS. Lazar, et al. Presence of leftâ toâ right atrial frequency gradient in paroxysmal but not persistent atrial fibrillation in humans. Circulation. 2004; 110 (20): 3181 â 3186.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceF. Atienza, et al. Realâ time dominant frequency mapping and ablation of dominant frequency sites in atrial fibrillation with leftâ toâ right frequency gradients predicts longâ term maintenance of sinus rhythm. Heart Rhythm. 2009; 6 (1): 33 â 40.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceF. Atienza, et al. Comparison of radiofrequency catheter ablation of drivers and circumferential pulmonary vein isolation in atrial fibrillation: a noninferiority randomized multicenter RADARâ AF trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014; 64 (23): 2455 â 2467.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ. Vogler, et al. Pulmonary vein isolation versus defragmentation: the CHASEâ AF clinical trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015; 66 (24): 2743 â 2752.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM. Haissaguerre, et al. Catheter ablation of longâ lasting persistent atrial fibrillation: clinical outcome and mechanisms of subsequent arrhythmias. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005; 16 (11): 1138 â 1147.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceK. Nademanee, et al. A new approach for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: mapping of the electrophysiologic substrate. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 43 (11): 2044 â 2053.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM.D. O׳Neill, et al. Longâ term followâ up of persistent atrial fibrillation ablation using termination as a procedural endpoint. Eur Heart J. 2009; 30 (9): 1105 â 1112.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceL.W. Lo, et al. Predicting factors for atrial fibrillation acute termination during catheter ablation procedures: implications for catheter ablation strategy and longâ term outcome. Heart Rhythm. 2009; 6 (3): 311 â 318.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZ. Zhang, et al. Linear ablation following pulmonary vein isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation: a metaâ analysis. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2016; 39 (6): 623 â 630.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceT.H. Kim, et al. Linear ablation in addition to circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (Dallas lesion set) does not improve clinical outcome in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a prospective randomized study. Europace. 2015; 17 (3): 388 â 395.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceG.J. Wynn, et al. Biatrial linear ablation in sustained nonpermanent AF: results of the substrate modification with ablation and antiarrhythmic drugs in nonpermanent atrial fibrillation (SMANâ PAF) trial. Heart Rhythm. 2016; 13 (2): 399 â 406.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceH. Kottkamp, et al. Box Isolation of Fibrotic Areas (BIFA): a patientâ tailored substrate modification approach for ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016; 27 (1): 22 â 30.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceH. Kottkamp, R. Bender, J. Berg. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: how to modify the substrate?. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015; 65 (2): 196 â 206.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS. Rolf, et al. Tailored atrial substrate modification based on lowâ voltage areas in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014; 7 (5): 825 â 833.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR. Bai, et al. Proven isolation of the pulmonary vein antrum with or without left atrial posterior wall isolation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2016; 13 (1): 132 â 140.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM.J. Cutler, et al. Impact of voltage mapping to guide whether to perform ablation of the posterior wall in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016; 27 (1): 13 â 21.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceG. Yang, et al. Catheter ablation of nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation using electrophysiologically guided substrate modification during sinus rhythm after pulmonary vein isolation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2016; 9 (2): e003382.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA. Verma, et al. Preâ existent left atrial scarring in patients undergoing pulmonary vein antrum isolation: an independent predictor of procedural failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; 45 (2): 285 â 292.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS. Kapa, et al. Contact electroanatomic mapping derived voltage criteria for characterizing left atrial scar in patients undergoing ablation for atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014; 25 (10): 1044 â 1052.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR.S. Oakes, et al. Detection and quantification of left atrial structural remodeling with delayedâ enhancement magnetic resonance imaging in patients with atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2009; 119 (13): 1758 â 1767.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceC. McGann, et al. Atrial fibrillation ablation outcome is predicted by left atrial remodeling on MRI. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014; 7 (1): 23 â 30.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceN. Dagres, et al. Current ablation techniques for persistent atrial fibrillation: results of the European Heart Rhythm Association Survey. Europace. 2015; 17 (10): 1596 â 1600.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceK. Nademanee, et al. Clinical outcomes of catheter substrate ablation for highâ risk patients with atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008; 51 (8): 843 â 849.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM. Haissaguerre, et al. Localized sources maintaining atrial fibrillation organized by prior ablation. Circulation. 2006; 113 (5): 616 â 625.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM. Haissaguerre, et al. Catheter ablation of longâ lasting persistent atrial fibrillation: critical structures for termination. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005; 16 (11): 1125 â 1137.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceY. Takahashi, et al. Characterization of electrograms associated with termination of chronic atrial fibrillation by catheter ablation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008; 51 (10): 1003 â 1010.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS.M. Singh, et al. Intraprocedural use of ibutilide to organize and guide ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms: preliminary assessment of a modified stepâ wise approach to ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010; 21 (6): 608 â 616.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS.M. Narayan, et al. Classifying fractionated electrograms in human atrial fibrillation using monophasic action potentials and activation mapping: evidence for localized drivers, rate acceleration, and nonlocal signal etiologies. Heart Rhythm. 2011; 8 (2): 244 â 253.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA. Verma, et al. Selective CFAE targeting for atrial fibrillation study (SELECT AF): clinical rationale, design, and implementation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2011; 22 (5): 541 â 547.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ.G. Quintanilla, et al. Mechanistic approaches to detect, target, and ablate the drivers of atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2016; 9 (1): e002481.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceB.J. Hansen, et al. Atrial fibrillation driven by microâ anatomic intramural reâ entry revealed by simultaneous subâ epicardial and subâ endocardial optical mapping in explanted human hearts. Eur Heart J. 2015; 36 (35): 2390 â 2401.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceP.S. Cuculich, et al. Noninvasive characterization of epicardial activation in humans with diverse atrial fibrillation patterns. Circulation. 2010; 122 (S): 1364 â 1372.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM. Haissaguerre, et al. Driver domains in persistent atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2014; 130 (7): 530 â 538.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS.M. Narayan, et al. Ablation of rotor and focal sources reduces late recurrence of atrial fibrillation compared with trigger ablation alone: extended followâ up of the CONFIRM trial (Conventional Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation With or Without Focal Impulse and Rotor Modulation). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014; 63 (17): 1761 â 1768.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceY.J. Lin, et al. Prevalence, characteristics, mapping, and catheter ablation of potential rotors in nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013; 6 (5): 851 â 858.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceY.â J. Lin, et al. Benefits of atrial substrate modification guided by electrogram similarity and phase mapping techniques to eliminate rotors and focal sources versus conventional defragmentation in persistent atrial fibrillation. JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology. 2016; 2 (6): 667 â 678.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS. Stavrakis, et al. The role of the autonomic ganglia in atrial fibrillation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2015; 1 (1â 2): 1 â 13.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ.M. Miller, et al. Initial independent outcomes from focal impulse and rotor modulation ablation for atrial fibrillation: multicenter FIRM registry. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014; 25 (9): 921 â 929.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceY.J. Lin, et al. Electrophysiological characteristics and catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal right atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2005; 112 (12): 1692 â 1700.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS.M. Narayan, et al. Treatment of atrial fibrillation by the ablation of localized sources: CONFIRM (Conventional Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation With or Without Focal Impulse and Rotor Modulation) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 60 (7): 628 â 636.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceW.J. Rappel, S.M. Narayan. Theoretical considerations for mapping activation in human cardiac fibrillation. Chaos. 2013; 23 (2): 023113.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceC. Gianni, et al. Acute and early outcomes of focal impulse and rotor modulation (FIRM)â guided rotorsâ only ablation in patients with nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2016; 13 (4): 830 â 835.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS.M. Narayan, J.A. Zaman. Mechanistically based mapping of human cardiac fibrillation. J Physiol. 2016; 594 (9): 2399 â 2415.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceP. Sommer, et al. Successful repeat catheter ablation of recurrent longâ standing persistent atrial fibrillation with rotor elimination as the procedural endpoint: a case series. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016; 27 (3): 274 â 280.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceE. Buch, et al. Longâ term clinical outcomes of focal impulse and rotor modulation for treatment of atrial fibrillation: A multicenter experience. Heart Rhythm. 2016; 13 (3): 636 â 641.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceP. Benharash, et al. Quantitative analysis of localized sources identified by focal impulse and rotor modulation mapping in atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015; 8 (3): 554 â 561.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceC. Ramanathan, et al. Noninvasive electrocardiographic imaging for cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmia. Nat Med. 2004; 10 (4): 422 â 428.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceH.S. Lim, et al. Noninvasive mapping to guide atrial fibrillation ablation. Card Electrophysiol Clin. 2015; 7 (1): 89 â 98.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS. Yamashita, et al. Body surface mapping to guide atrial fibrillation ablation. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2015; 4 (3): 172 â 176.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM.S. Guillem, et al. Noninvasive mapping of human atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2009; 20 (5): 507 â 513.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM.S. Guillem, et al. Noninvasive localization of maximal frequency sites of atrial fibrillation by body surface potential mapping. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013; 6 (2): 294 â 301.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM. Rodrigo, et al. Body surface localization of left and right atrial highâ frequency rotors in atrial fibrillation patients: a clinicalâ computational study. Heart Rhythm. 2014; 11 (9): 1584 â 1591.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ.A. Armour, et al. Gross and microscopic anatomy of the human intrinsic cardiac nervous system. Anat Rec. 1997; 247 (2): 289 â 298.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS.S. Po, H. Nakagawa, W.M. Jackman. Localization of left atrial ganglionated plexi in patients with atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2009; 20 (10): 1186 â 1189.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceE. Patterson, et al. Triggered firing in pulmonary veins initiated by in vitro autonomic nerve stimulation. Heart Rhythm. 2005; 2 (6): 624 â 631.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceE.K. Choi, et al. Intrinsic cardiac nerve activity and paroxysmal atrial tachyarrhythmia in ambulatory dogs. Circulation. 2010; 121 (24): 2615 â 2623.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD.G. Katritsis, et al. Autonomic denervation added to pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a randomized clinical trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 62 (24): 2318 â 2325.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceH. Nakagawa, et al. Pathophysiologic basis of autonomic ganglionated plexus ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2009; 6 (12 Suppl): S26 â S34.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM. Bettoni, M. Zimmermann. Autonomic tone variations before the onset of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2002; 105 (23): 2753 â 2759.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD.H. Pauza, et al. Morphology, distribution, and variability of the epicardiac neural ganglionated subplexuses in the human heart. Anat Rec. 2000; 259 (4): 353 â 382.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceB.J. Scherlag, et al. Electrical stimulation to identify neural elements on the heart: their role in atrial fibrillation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2005; 13 (Suppl 1): 37 â 42.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceE. Patterson, et al. Sodiumâ calcium exchange initiated by the Ca2+ transient: an arrhythmia trigger within pulmonary veins. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 47 (6): 1196 â 1206.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceK. Lemola, et al. Pulmonary vein region ablation in experimental vagal atrial fibrillation: role of pulmonary veins versus autonomic ganglia. Circulation. 2008; 117 (4): 470 â 477.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceK. Nishida, et al. The role of pulmonary veins vs. autonomic ganglia in different experimental substrates of canine atrial fibrillation. Cardiovasc Res. 2011; 89 (4): 825 â 833.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceK. Nishida, et al. Atrial fibrillation ablation: translating basic mechanistic insights to the patient. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014; 64: 823 â 831.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceE. Pokushalov, et al. Left atrial ablation at the anatomic areas of ganglionated plexi for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2010; 33 (10): 1231 â 1238.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceE. Pokushalov, et al. Ganglionated plexi ablation for longâ standing persistent atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2010; 12 (3): 342 â 346.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceE. Pokushalov, et al. Catheter versus surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation after a failed initial pulmonary vein isolation procedure: a randomized controlled trial. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013; 24 (12): 1338 â 1343.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceE. Pokushalov, et al. Ganglionated plexus ablation vs linear ablation in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation for persistent/longâ standing persistent atrial fibrillation: a randomized comparison. Heart Rhythm. 2013; 10 (9): 1280 â 1286.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD.M. Lloydâ Jones, et al. Lifetime risk for development of atrial fibrillation: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2004; 110 (9): 1042 â 1046.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR. Mahajan, et al. Electrophysiological, electroanatomical, and structural remodeling of the atria as consequences of sustained obesity. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015; 66 (1): 1 â 11.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA. Wokhlu, et al. Longâ term outcome of atrial fibrillation ablation: impact and predictors of very late recurrence. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010; 21 (10): 1071 â 1078.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS. Dublin, et al. Risk of newâ onset atrial fibrillation in relation to body mass index. Arch Intern Med. 2006; 166 (21): 2322 â 2328.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA.S. Gami, et al. Obstructive sleep apnea, obesity, and the risk of incident atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007; 49 (5): 565 â 571.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceU.B. Tedrow, et al. The longâ and shortâ term impact of elevated body mass index on the risk of new atrial fibrillation the WHS (Women׳s Health Study). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010; 55 (21): 2319 â 2327.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR.R. Huxley, et al. Absolute and attributable risks of atrial fibrillation in relation to optimal and borderline risk factors: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. Circulation. 2011; 123 (14): 1501 â 1508.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceT.M. Munger, et al. Electrophysiological and hemodynamic characteristics associated with obesity in patients with atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 60 (9): 851 â 860.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceH.S. Abed, et al. Obesity results in progressive atrial structural and electrical remodeling: implications for atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2013; 10 (1): 90 â 100.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceB. Richter, et al. Is inducibility of atrial fibrillation after radio frequency ablation really a relevant prognostic factor?. Eur Heart J. 2006; 27 (21): 2553 â 2559.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceK. Jongnarangsin, et al. Body mass index, obstructive sleep apnea, and outcomes of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2008; 19 (7): 668 â 672.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA.N. Shah, et al. Longâ term outcome following successful pulmonary vein isolation: pattern and prediction of very late recurrence. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2008; 19 (7): 661 â 667.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS.L. Chang, et al. Comparison of outcome in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with versus without the metabolic syndrome. Am J Cardiol. 2009; 103 (1): 67 â 72.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceK.P. Letsas, et al. Preâ ablative predictors of atrial fibrillation recurrence following pulmonary vein isolation: the potential role of inflammation. Europace. 2009; 11 (2): 158 â 163.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR.B. Tang, et al. Metabolic syndrome and risk of recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation. Circ J. 2009; 73 (3): 438 â 443.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceH. Jin Hwang, et al. Atrial electroanatomical remodeling as a determinant of different outcomes between two current ablation strategies: circumferential pulmonary vein isolation vs pulmonary vein isolation. Clin Cardiol. 2010; 33 (3): E69 â E74.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD. Patel, et al. Outcomes and complications of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in females. Heart Rhythm. 2010; 7 (2): 167 â 172.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD. Patel, et al. Safety and efficacy of pulmonary vein antral isolation in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: the impact of continuous positive airway pressure. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2010; 3 (5): 445 â 451.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD. Patel, et al. The impact of statins and reninâ angiotensinâ aldosterone system blockers on pulmonary vein antrum isolation outcomes in postâ menopausal females. Europace. 2010; 12 (3): 322 â 330.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceT.F. Chao, et al. Associations between renal function, atrial substrate properties and outcome of catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Circ J. 2011; 75 (10): 2326 â 2332.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR.A. Winkle, et al. Relation of early termination of persistent atrial fibrillation by cardioversion or drugs to ablation outcomes. Am J Cardiol. 2011; 108 (3): 374 â 379.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceC.X. Wong, et al. Pericardial fat is associated with atrial fibrillation severity and ablation outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 57 (17): 1745 â 1751.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ.H. Kang, et al. Prediction of longâ term outcomes of catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation by parameters of preablation DC cardioversion. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2012; 23 (11): 1165 â 1170.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS. Mohanty, et al. Impact of metabolic syndrome on procedural outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 59 (14): 1295 â 1301.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceK. Ejima, et al. Impact of diastolic dysfunction on the outcome of catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation. Int J Cardiol. 2013; 164 (1): 88 â 93.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceK.P. Letsas, et al. The impact of body mass index on the efficacy and safety of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Int J Cardiol. 2013; 164 (1): 94 â 98.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceC.X. Wong, et al. Obesity and the risk of incident, postâ operative, and postâ ablation atrial fibrillation: a metaâ analysis of 626,603 individuals in 51 studies. JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology. 2015; 1 (3): 139 â 152.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA. Alonso, et al. Effect of an intensive lifestyle intervention on atrial fibrillation risk in individuals with type 2 diabetes: the Look AHEAD randomized trial. Am Heart J. 2015; 170 (4): 770 â 777.e5.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR.K. Pathak, et al. Aggressive risk factor reduction study for atrial fibrillation and implications for the outcome of ablation: the ARRESTâ AF cohort study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014; 64 (21): 2222 â 2231.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceT. Bitter, et al. Sleepâ disordered breathing and cardiac arrhythmias. Can J Cardiol. 2015; 31 (7): 928 â 934.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceE.C. Fletcher. Effect of episodic hypoxia on sympathetic activity and blood pressure. Respir Physiol. 2000; 119 (2â 3): 189 â 197.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceH. Kraiczi, et al. Increased vasoconstrictor sensitivity in obstructive sleep apnea. J Appl Physiol. 1985; 89 (2): 493 â 498.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM. Ghias, et al. The role of ganglionated plexi in apneaâ related atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009; 54 (22): 2075 â 2083.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD. Linz, et al. Negative tracheal pressure during obstructive respiratory events promotes atrial fibrillation by vagal activation. Heart Rhythm. 2011; 8 (9): 1436 â 1443.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD. Linz, et al. Renal sympathetic denervation suppresses postapneic blood pressure rises and atrial fibrillation in a model for sleep apnea. Hypertension. 2012; 60 (1): 172 â 178.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD. Linz, et al. Effect of renal denervation on neurohumoral activation triggering atrial fibrillation in obstructive sleep apnea. Hypertension. 2013; 62 (4): 767 â 774.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceY.K. Iwasaki, et al. Determinants of atrial fibrillation in an animal model of obesity and acute obstructive sleep apnea. Heart Rhythm. 2012; 9 (9): 1409 â 1416.e1.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceY.K. Iwasaki, et al. Atrial fibrillation promotion with longâ term repetitive obstructive sleep apnea in a rat model. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014; 64 (19): 2013 â 2023.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceH. Dimitri, et al. Atrial remodeling in obstructive sleep apnea: implications for atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2012; 9 (3): 321 â 327.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceI.H. Stevenson, et al. Atrial electrophysiology is altered by acute hypercapnia but not hypoxemia: implications for promotion of atrial fibrillation in pulmonary disease and sleep apnea. Heart Rhythm. 2010; 7 (9): 1263 â 1270.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceF. Holmqvist, et al. Impact of obstructive sleep apnea and continuous positive airway pressure therapy on outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillationâ Results from the Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation (ORBITâ AF). Am Heart J. 2015; 169 (5): 647 â 654.e2.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceY. Kwon, et al. Association of sleep characteristics with atrial fibrillation: the Multiâ Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Thorax. 2015; 70 (9): 873 â 879.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR. Kanagala, et al. Obstructive sleep apnea and the recurrence of atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2003; 107 (20): 2589 â 2594.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA.S. Fein, et al. Treatment of obstructive sleep apnea reduces the risk of atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 62 (4): 300 â 305.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM. Matiello, et al. Low efficacy of atrial fibrillation ablation in severe obstructive sleep apnoea patients. Europace. 2010; 12 (8): 1084 â 1089.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceY. Naruse, et al. Concomitant obstructive sleep apnea increases the recurrence of atrial fibrillation following radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: clinical impact of continuous positive airway pressure therapy. Heart Rhythm. 2013; 10 (3): 331 â 337.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceT.G. Neilan, et al. Effect of sleep apnea and continuous positive airway pressure on cardiac structure and recurrence of atrial fibrillation. J Am Heart Assoc. 2013; 2 (6): e000421.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceL. Li, et al. Efficacy of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea with and without continuous positive airway pressure treatment: a metaâ analysis of observational studies. Europace. 2014; 16 (9): 1309 â 1314.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM.H. Raitt, et al. Reversal of electrical remodeling after cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2004; 15 (5): 507 â 512.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceN. Chalfoun, et al. Reverse electrical remodeling of the atria post cardioversion in patients who remain in sinus rhythm assessed by signal averaging of the Pâ wave. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2007; 30 (4): 502 â 509.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM. Igarashi, et al. Effect of restoration of sinus rhythm by extensive antiarrhythmic drugs in predicting results of catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol. 2010; 106 (1): 62 â 68.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceL. Rivard, et al. Improved outcome following restoration of sinus rhythm prior to catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation: a comparative multicenter study. Heart Rhythm. 2012; 9 (7): 1025 â 1030.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS. Mohanty, et al. Effect of periprocedural amiodarone on procedure outcome in patients with longâ standing persistent atrial fibrillation undergoing extended pulmonary vein antrum isolation: results from a randomized study (SPECULATE). Heart Rhythm. 2015; 12 (3): 477 â 483.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceI.M. Robbins, et al. Pulmonary vein stenosis after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 1998; 98 (17): 1769 â 1775.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS. Ernst, et al. Total pulmonary vein occlusion as a consequence of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation mimicking primary lung disease. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2003; 14 (4): 366 â 370.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM. Mansour, et al. Assessment of pulmonary vein anatomic variability by magnetic resonance imaging: implications for catheter ablation techniques for atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2004; 15 (4): 387 â 393.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD.R. Holmes Jr., K.H. Monahan, D. Packer. Pulmonary vein stenosis complicating ablation for atrial fibrillation: clinical spectrum and interventional considerations. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009; 2 (4): 267 â 276.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceE.A. Fender, D.L. Packer, D.R. Holmes Jr.. Pulmonary vein stenosis after atrial fibrillation ablation. EuroIntervention. 2016; 12 (Suppl X): X31 â X34.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceL. Di Biase, et al. Pulmonary vein total occlusion following catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: clinical implications after longâ term followâ up. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 48 (12): 2493 â 2499.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceL.R. Prieto, et al. Comparison of stent versus balloon angioplasty for pulmonary vein stenosis complicating pulmonary vein isolation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2008; 19 (7): 673 â 678.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD.L. Packer, et al. Clinical presentation, investigation, and management of pulmonary vein stenosis complicating ablation for atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2005; 111 (5): 546 â 554.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceG.W. Taylor, et al. Pathological effects of extensive radiofrequency energy applications in the pulmonary veins in dogs. Circulation. 2000; 101 (14): 1736 â 1742.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceT. Arentz, et al. Incidence of pulmonary vein stenosis 2 years after radiofrequency catheter ablation of refractory atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J. 2003; 24 (10): 963 â 969.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceH.F. Tse, et al. Pulmonary vein isolation using transvenous catheter cryoablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation without risk of pulmonary vein stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003; 42 (4): 752 â 758.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceL. Kasper, et al. Hemoptysis and lung disease as a manifestation of pulmonary vein stenosis after cryoballoon catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Pol Arch Med Wewn. 2016; 126 (1â 2): 94 â 96.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ. Dong, et al. Incidence and predictors of pulmonary vein stenosis following catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation using the anatomic pulmonary vein ablation approach: results from paired magnetic resonance imaging. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005; 16 (8): 845 â 852.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR.H. Hoyt, et al. Transvenous catheter cryoablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation: results of a feasibility study. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2005; 28 (Suppl 1): S78 â S82.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceE.B. Saad, et al. Pulmonary vein stenosis after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: emergence of a new clinical syndrome. Ann Intern Med. 2003; 138 (8): 634 â 638.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS. Hilbert, et al. Pulmonary vein collateral formation as a longâ term result of postâ interventional pulmonary vein stenosis. Eur Heart J. 2016; 37 (31): 2474.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS. Hilbert, P. Sommer, A. Bollmann. Pulmonary vein dilatation in a case of total pulmonary vein occlusion: contemporary approach using a combination of 3Dâ mapping system and image integration. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016; 88 (7): E227 â E232.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceE.A. Fender, et al. Severe pulmonary vein stenosis resulting from ablation for atrial fibrillation: presentation, management, and clinical outcomes. Circulation. 2016; 134 (23): 1812 â 1821.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceT.J. De Potter, et al. Drugâ eluting stents for the treatment of pulmonary vein stenosis after atrial fibrillation ablation. Europace. 2011; 13 (1): 57 â 61.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceK.R. Kanter, P.M. Kirshbom, B.E. Kogon. Surgical repair of pulmonary venous stenosis: a word of caution. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014; 98 (5): 1687 â 1691, discussion 1691â 1692.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceN.S. Patel, et al. Successful surgical repair of iatrogenic pulmonary vein stenosis. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2012; 23 (6): 656 â 658.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA. Bharat, et al. Lung transplant is a viable treatment option for patients with congenital and acquired pulmonary vein stenosis. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2013; 32 (6): 621 â 625.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS.P. Ponamgi, et al. Catheterâ based intervention for pulmonary vein stenosis due to fibrosing mediastinitis: the Mayo Clinic experience. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2015; 8: 103 â 107.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS. Mohanty, et al. Impact of alcohol intake on thromboembolic events following catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014; 63 (12_S).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceL. Di Biase, et al. Esophageal capsule endoscopy after radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: documented higher risk of luminal esophageal damage with general anesthesia as compared with conscious sedation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2009; 2 (2): 108 â 112.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR. Cappato, et al. Worldwide survey on the methods, efficacy, and safety of catheter ablation for human atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2005; 111 (9): 1100 â 1105.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceC. Pappone, et al. Atrioâ esophageal fistula as a complication of percutaneous transcatheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2004; 109 (22): 2724 â 2726.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM. Martinek, et al. Identification of a highâ risk population for esophageal injury during radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: procedural and anatomical considerations. Heart Rhythm. 2010; 7 (9): 1224 â 1230.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS.M. Singh, et al. Clinical outcomes after repair of left atrial esophageal fistulas occurring after atrial fibrillation ablation procedures. Heart Rhythm. 2013; 10 (11): 1591 â 1597.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceT.J. Bunch, et al. Temporary esophageal stenting allows healing of esophageal perforations following atrial fibrillation ablation procedures. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2006; 17 (4): 435 â 439.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR. Cappato, et al. Prevalence and causes of fatal outcome in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009; 53 (19): 1798 â 1803.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceC. Tan, A. Coffey. Atrioesophageal fistula after surgical unipolar radiofrequency atrial ablation for atrial fibrillation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013; 95 (3): e61 â e62.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS. Mohanty. Outcomes of atrioâ esophageal fistula following catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation treated with surgical repair versus esophageal stenting. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014; 25 (9): E6.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS. Mohanty, et al. Outcomes of atrioesophageal fistula following catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation treated with surgical repair versus esophageal stenting. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014; 25 (6): 579 â 584.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR. Cappato, et al. Updated worldwide survey on the methods, efficacy, and safety of catheter ablation for human atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2010; 3 (1): 32 â 38.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA.M. Gillinov, G. Pettersson, T.W. Rice. Esophageal injury during radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001; 122 (6): 1239 â 1240.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceF.W. Mohr, et al. Curative treatment of atrial fibrillation with intraoperative radiofrequency ablation: shortâ term and midterm results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002; 123 (5): 919 â 927.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceN. Doll, et al. Esophageal perforation during left atrial radiofrequency ablation: Is the risk too high?. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003; 125 (4): 836 â 842.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceB. Sonmez, et al. A fatal complication due to radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation: atrioâ esophageal fistula. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003; 76 (1): 281 â 283.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM.I. Scanavacca, et al. Left atrialâ esophageal fistula following radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2004; 15 (8): 960 â 962.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceB. Borchert, et al. Lethal atrioesophageal fistula after pulmonary vein isolation using highâ intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU). Heart Rhythm. 2008; 5 (1): 145 â 148.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceK.K. Ghia, et al. A nationwide survey on the prevalence of atrioesophageal fistula after left atrial radiofrequency catheter ablation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2009; 24 (1): 33 â 36.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceG.W. Gilcrease, J.B. Stein. A delayed case of fatal atrioesophageal fistula following radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010; 21 (6): 708 â 711.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceF. Stockigt, et al. Atrioesophageal fistula after cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2012; 23 (11): 1254 â 1257.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceO. Yousuf, H. Calkins. Sounding the warning on the potential for oesophageal injury resulting from use of the nMARQ for ablation of atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2015; 17 (3): 343 â 344.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceP.G. Jackson, et al. The vagus plays a role in the antiâ reflux barrier by controlling both the lower esophageal sphincter pressure and crural diaphragm activity. J Am Coll Surg. 2005; 201 (3 Suppl): S11.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceG. Nolker, et al. Esophageal acid levels after pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2009; 32 (Suppl 1): S228 â S230.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ.T. Medeiros De Vasconcelos, et al. Atrialâ oesophageal fistula following percutaneous radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: the risk still persists. Europace. 2017; 19 (2): 250 â 258.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA. Rillig, et al. Modified energy settings are mandatory to minimize oesophageal injury using the novel multipolar irrigated radiofrequency ablation catheter for pulmonary vein isolation. Europace. 2015; 17 (3): 396 â 402.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceP. Chavez, et al. Atrioesophageal fistula following ablation procedures for atrial fibrillation: systematic review of case reports. Open Heart. 2015; 2 (1): e000257.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ.C. Mateos, et al. Simplified method for esophagus protection during radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillationâ prospective study of 704 cases. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2015; 30 (2): 139 â 147.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceH.B. Shim, et al. Successful management of atrioâ esophageal fistula after cardiac radiofrequency catheter ablation. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013; 46 (2): 142 â 145.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceE. Blackâ Maier, et al. Risk of atrioesophageal fistula formation with contactâ force sensing catheters. Heart Rhythm. 2017, S1547â 5271(17) 30452â 30456
dc.identifier.citedreferenceP. Santangeli, et al. Ablation of atrial fibrillation under therapeutic warfarin reduces periprocedural complications: evidence from a metaâ analysis. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012; 5 (2): 302 â 311.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceL. Di Biase, et al. Periprocedural stroke and management of major bleeding complications in patients undergoing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: the impact of periprocedural therapeutic international normalized ratio. Circulation. 2010; 121 (23): 2550 â 2556.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceO.M. Wazni, et al. Atrial fibrillation ablation in patients with therapeutic international normalized ratio: comparison of strategies of anticoagulation management in the periprocedural period. Circulation. 2007; 116 (22): 2531 â 2534.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM. Schmidt, et al. Atrial fibrillation ablation in patients with therapeutic international normalized ratios. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2009; 32 (8): 995 â 999.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA. Hakalahti, et al. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with therapeutic oral anticoagulation treatment. Europace. 2011; 13 (5): 640 â 645.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceL. Di Biase, et al. Periprocedural stroke and bleeding complications in patients undergoing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation with different anticoagulation management: results from the Role of Coumadin in Preventing Thromboembolism in Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Patients Undergoing Catheter Ablation (COMPARE) randomized trial. Circulation. 2014; 129 (25): 2638 â 2644.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS.H. Hohnloser, A.J. Camm. Safety and efficacy of dabigatran etexilate during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a metaâ analysis of the literature. Europace. 2013; 15 (10): 1407 â 1411.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceH. Calkins, et al. REâ CIRCUIT studyâ randomized evaluation of Dabigatran etexilate compared to warfarin in pulmonary vein ablation: assessment of an uninterrupted periprocedural anticoagulation strategy. Am J Cardiol. 2015; 115 (1): 154 â 155.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR. Cappato, et al. Uninterrupted rivaroxaban vs. uninterrupted vitamin K antagonists for catheter ablation in nonâ valvular atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J. 2015; 36 (28): 1805 â 1811.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceL. Di Biase, et al. Feasibility and safety of uninterrupted periprocedural apixaban administration in patients undergoing radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: results from a multicenter study. Heart Rhythm. 2015; 12 (6): 1162 â 1168.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM. Bassiouny, et al. Use of dabigatran for periprocedural anticoagulation in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013; 6 (3): 460 â 466.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA.A. Bin Abdulhak, et al. Safety and efficacy of interrupted dabigatran for periâ procedural anticoagulation in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and metaâ analysis. Europace. 2013; 15 (10): 1412 â 1420.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR. Providencia, et al. Rivaroxaban and dabigatran in patients undergoing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2014; 16 (8): 1137 â 1144.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR.A. Winkle, et al. Periâ procedural interrupted oral anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation ablation: comparison of aspirin, warfarin, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban. Europace. 2014; 16 (10): 1443 â 1449.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceH.L. Armbruster, et al. Safety of novel oral anticoagulants compared with uninterrupted warfarin for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Ann Pharmacother. 2015; 49 (3): 278 â 284.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ.F. Ren, F.E. Marchlinski, D.J. Callans. Left atrial thrombus associated with ablation for atrial fibrillation: identification with intracardiac echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 43 (10): 1861 â 1867.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS. Saksena, et al. A prospective comparison of cardiac imaging using intracardiac echocardiography with transesophageal echocardiography in patients with atrial fibrillation: the intracardiac echocardiography guided cardioversion helps interventional procedures study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2010; 3 (6): 571 â 577.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ. Baran, et al. Intracardiac echocardiography for detection of thrombus in the left atrial appendage: comparison with transesophageal echocardiography in patients undergoing ablation for atrial fibrillation: the Actionâ Ice I Study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013; 6 (6): 1074 â 1081.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ.F. Ren, et al. Intracardiac echocardiographic diagnosis of thrombus formation in the left atrial appendage: a complementary role to transesophageal echocardiography. Echocardiography. 2013; 30 (1): 72 â 80.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceE. Anter, et al. Comparison of intracardiac echocardiography and transesophageal echocardiography for imaging of the right and left atrial appendages. Heart Rhythm. 2014; 11 (11): 1890 â 1897.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceC.S. Sriram, et al. Detection of left atrial thrombus by intracardiac echocardiography in patients undergoing ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2015; 43 (3): 227 â 236.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceK. Maleki, et al. Intracardiac ultrasound detection of thrombus on transseptal sheath: incidence, treatment, and prevention. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005; 16 (6): 561 â 565.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceO.M. Wazni, et al. Embolic events and char formation during pulmonary vein isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation: impact of different anticoagulation regimens and importance of intracardiac echo imaging. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005; 16 (6): 576 â 581.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD. Shah. Filamentous thrombi during leftâ sided sheathâ assisted catheter ablations. Europace. 2010; 12 (12): 1657 â 1658.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ.F. Ren, et al. Increased intensity of anticoagulation may reduce risk of thrombus during atrial fibrillation ablation procedures in patients with spontaneous echo contrast. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005; 16 (5): 474 â 477.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceC.J. Bruce, et al. Early heparinization decreases the incidence of left atrial thrombi detected by intracardiac echocardiography during radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2008; 22 (3): 211 â 219.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS. Asbach, et al. Early heparin administration reduces risk for left atrial thrombus formation during atrial fibrillation ablation procedures. Cardiol Res Pract. 2011; 2011: 615087.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD.F. Briceno, et al. Clinical impact of heparin kinetics during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: metaâ analysis and metaâ regression. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016; 27 (6): 683 â 693.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceK. Chilukuri, et al. Incidence and outcomes of protamine reactions in patients undergoing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2009; 25 (3): 175 â 181.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS.C. Helps, et al. The effect of gas emboli on rabbit cerebral blood flow. Stroke. 1990; 21 (1): 94 â 99.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceG.S. Krivonyak, S.G. Warren. Cerebral arterial air embolism treated by a vertical headâ down maneuver. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2000; 49 (2): 185 â 187.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceB. Cauchemez, et al. Highâ flow perfusion of sheaths for prevention of thromboembolic complications during complex catheter ablation in the LA. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2004; 15 (3): 276 â 283.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceT. Kuwahara, et al. Clinical characteristics of massive air embolism complicating left atrial ablation of atrial fibrillation: lessons from five cases. Europace. 2012; 14 (2): 204 â 208.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceO.W. Franzen, et al. Mechanisms underlying air aspiration in patients undergoing left atrial catheterization. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008; 71 (4): 553 â 558.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceK.H. Ryu, et al. Heparin reduces neurological impairment after cerebral arterial air embolism in the rabbit. Stroke. 1996; 27 (2): 303 â 309, discussion 310.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceF. Gaita, et al. Incidence of silent cerebral thromboembolic lesions after atrial fibrillation ablation may change according to technology used: comparison of irrigated radiofrequency, multipolar nonirrigated catheter and cryoballoon. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2011; 22 (9): 961 â 968.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceC. Herrera Siklody, et al. Incidence of asymptomatic intracranial embolic events after pulmonary vein isolation: comparison of different atrial fibrillation ablation technologies in a multicenter study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 58 (7): 681 â 688.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA. Verma, et al. Evaluation and reduction of asymptomatic cerebral embolism in ablation of atrial fibrillation, but high prevalence of chronic silent infarction: results of the evaluation of reduction of asymptomatic cerebral embolism trial. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013; 6 (5): 835 â 842.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceY. De Greef, et al. Low rate of asymptomatic cerebral embolism and improved procedural efficiency with the novel pulmonary vein ablation catheter GOLD: results of the PRECISION GOLD trial. Europace. 2016; 18 (5): 687 â 695.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceT. Deneke, et al. Silent cerebral events/lesions related to atrial fibrillation ablation: a clinical review. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015; 26 (4): 455 â 463.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceF.M. Merchant, D.B. Delurgio. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation and risk of asymptomatic cerebral embolism. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2014; 37 (3): 389 â 397.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceL. Lickfett, et al. Cerebral diffusionâ weighted magnetic resonance imaging: a tool to monitor the thrombogenicity of left atrial catheter ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2006; 17 (1): 1 â 7.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
joa3369.pdf
Size:
11.56MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.