View Item 

Show simple item record

Simulation study of a high‐performance brain PET system with dodecahedral geometry

dc.contributor.authorTao, Weijie
dc.contributor.authorChen, Gaoyu
dc.contributor.authorWeng, Fenghua
dc.contributor.authorZan, Yunlong
dc.contributor.authorZhao, Zhixiang
dc.contributor.authorPeng, Qiyu
dc.contributor.authorXu, Jianfeng
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Qiu
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-13T18:50:40Z
dc.date.available2019-09-04T20:15:38Zen
dc.date.issued2018-07
dc.identifier.citationTao, Weijie; Chen, Gaoyu; Weng, Fenghua; Zan, Yunlong; Zhao, Zhixiang; Peng, Qiyu; Xu, Jianfeng; Huang, Qiu (2018). "Simulation study of a high‐performance brain PET system with dodecahedral geometry." Medical Physics 45(7): 3297-3304.
dc.identifier.issn0094-2405
dc.identifier.issn2473-4209
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/145295
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otherMonte Carlo simulation
dc.subject.othersystem evaluation
dc.subject.otherdodecahedral PET system
dc.titleSimulation study of a high‐performance brain PET system with dodecahedral geometry
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/145295/1/mp12996_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/145295/2/mp12996.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/mp.12996
dc.identifier.sourceMedical Physics
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRademakers F, Brun R. ROOT: an object‐oriented data analysis framework. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res. 1998; 389: 81 – 86.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSon YD, Kim HK, Kim ST, Kim NB, Kim YB, Cho ZH. Analysis of biased PET images caused by inaccurate attenuation coefficients. J Nucl Med. 2010; 51: 753 – 760.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePickut BA, Dierckx RA, Dobbeleir A, et al. Validation of the cerebellum as a reference region for SPECT quantification in patients suffering from dementia of the Alzheimer type. Psychiatry Res. 1999; 90: 103 – 112.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChatziioannou A, Dahlbom M. Study of the effects of whole body PET spatial sampling schemes on data SNR. Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record; 2002:1295–1299, vol. 2.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGong K, Majewski S, Kinahan PE, et al. Designing a compact high performance brain PET scanner‐simulation study. Phys Med Biol. 2016; 61: 3681.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTashima H, Yoshida E, Nishikido F, et al. Development of the helmet‐chin PET prototype. Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference; 2016:1–3.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTashima H, Yamaya T. Proposed helmet pet geometries with add‐on detectors for high sensitivity brain imaging. Phys Med Biol. 2016; 61: 7205.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAhmed AM, Tashima H, Yoshida E, Yamaya T. Investigation of the optimal detector arrangement for the helmet‐chin PET – a simulation study. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res. 2017; 858: 96 – 100.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAhmed AM, Tashima H, Yoshida E, Nishikido F, Yamaya T. Simulation study comparing the helmet‐chin PET with a cylindrical PET of the same number of detectors. Phys Med Biol. 2017; 62: 4541.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoghaddam NM, Karimian A, Mostajaboddavati SM, Vondervoort E, Sossi V. Preliminary design and simulation of a spherical brain PET system (SBPET) with liquid xenon as scintillator. Nukleonika. 2009; 54: 33 – 38.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBao Q, Cho S, Li Q, Newport D. Monte Carlo based estimation of detector response in a large solid angle Preclinical PET imaging system. IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record; 2008:5010–5013.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShi H, Du D, Xu J, Su Z, Peng Q. Design study of dedicated brain PET with polyhedron geometry. Technol Health Care. 2015; 23: S615.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJan S, Santin G, Strul D, et al. Gate: a simulation toolkit for PET and SPECT. Phys Med Biol. 2004; 49: 4543.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKao CM, Dong Y, Xie Q. Evaluation of 3D image reconstruction methods for a dual‐head small‐animal PET scanner. Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record; 2008:3046–3050.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKao CM, Pan X, Chen CT. Accurate image reconstruction using DOI information and its implications for the development of compact PET systems. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 2002; 47: 1551 – 1560.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJaszczak RJ. Nuclear imaging phantom. US 4499375 A; 1985.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHoffman EJ, Cutler PD, Digby WM, Mazziotta JC. 3‐D phantom to simulate cerebral blood flow and metabolic images for PET. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 1990; 37: 616 – 620.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHuesman RH, Klein GJ, Moses WW, Qi J. List‐mode maximum‐likelihood reconstruction applied to positron emission mammography (PEM) with irregular sampling. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2000; 19: 532 – 537.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJan S, Comtat C, Strul D, Stantin G, Trebossen R. Monte Carlo simulation for the ECAT EXACT HR+ system using GATE. Trans Nucl Sci. 2005; 52: 627 – 633.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRausch I, Cal‐González J, Dapra D, et al. Performance evaluation of the Biograph mCT Flow PET/CT system according to the NEMA NU2‐2012 standard. Ejnmmi Phys. 2015; 2: 1 – 17.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThielemans K, Tsoumpas C, Mustafovic S, et al. STIR: software for tomographic image reconstruction release 2. Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record. IEEE, 2174‐2176; 2012.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStrother SC, Casey ME, Hoffman EJ. Measuring PET scanner sensitivity: relating countrates to image signal‐to‐noise ratios using noise equivalents counts. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 1990; 37: 783 – 788.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHart HJ, Bottomley PA, Edelstein WA, et al. Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging: contrast‐to‐noise ratio as a function of strength of magnetic field. Magn Reson Imaging. 1983; 2: 1195.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCho ZH, Son YD, Choi EJ, et al. In‐vivo human brain molecular imaging with a brain‐dedicated PET/MRI system. Magn Reson Mater Phy. 2013; 26: 71 – 79.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKarp JS, Surti S, Freifelder R, et al. Performance of a GSO brain PET camera. Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record; 2000:17/7‐1711, vol. 3.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCho ZH, Hong KS, Hilal SK. Spherical positron emission tomograph (S‐PET) I ‐ performance analysis. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res. 1984; 225: 422 – 438.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReske SN, Kotzerke J. FDG‐PET for clinical use. Eur J Nucl Med. 2001; 28: 1707 – 1723.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSossi V, De Jong HWAM, Barker WC, Bloomfield P. The second generation HRRT ‐ a multi‐centre scanner performance investigation. Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record; 2005:2195–2199.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDe Jong HW, Van Velden FH, Kloet RW, Buijs FL, Boellaard R, Lammertsma AA. Performance evaluation of the ECAT HRRT: an LSO‐LYSO double layer high resolution, high sensitivity scanner. Phys Med Biol. 2007; 52: 1505 – 1526.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOmura T, Moriya T, Yamada R, et al. Development of a high‐resolution four‐layer DOI detector using MPPCs for brain PET. Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference; 2012:3560–3563.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWatanabe M, Saito A, Isobe T, et al. Performance evaluation of a high‐resolution brain PET scanner using four‐layer MPPC DOI detectors. Phys Med Biol. 2017; 62: 7148.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePajak MZ, Volgyes D, Pimlott SL, et al. NEMA NU4‐2008 performance evaluation of Albira: a two‐ring small‐animal PET system using continuous LYSO crystals. Open Med J. 2016; 3: 12 – 26.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
mp12996_am.pdf
Size:
534.1KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
mp12996.pdf
Size:
728.8KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.