Show simple item record

Traditional Roles in a Non‐Traditional Setting: Genetic Counseling in Precision Oncology

dc.contributor.authorEverett, Jessica N.
dc.contributor.authorGustafson, Shanna L.
dc.contributor.authorRaymond, Victoria M.
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-15T20:29:19Z
dc.date.available2019-01-15T20:29:19Z
dc.date.issued2014-08
dc.identifier.citationEverett, Jessica N.; Gustafson, Shanna L.; Raymond, Victoria M. (2014). "Traditional Roles in a Non‐Traditional Setting: Genetic Counseling in Precision Oncology." Journal of Genetic Counseling 23(4): 655-660.
dc.identifier.issn1059-7700
dc.identifier.issn1573-3599
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/147078
dc.description.abstractNext generation sequencing technology is increasingly utilized in oncology with the goal of targeting therapeutics to improve response and reduce side effects. Interpretation of tumor mutations requires sequencing of paired germline DNA, raising questions about incidental germline findings. We describe our experiences as part of a research team implementing a protocol for whole genome sequencing (WGS) of tumors and paired germline DNA known as the Michigan Oncology Sequencing project (MI‐ONCOSEQ) that includes options for receiving incidental germline findings. Genetic counselors (GCs) discuss options for return of results with patients during the informed consent process and document family histories. GCs also review germline findings and actively participate in the multi‐disciplinary Precision Medicine Tumor Board (PMTB), providing clinical context for interpretation of germline results and making recommendations about disclosure of germline findings. GCs have encountered ethical and counseling challenges with participants, described here. Although GCs have not been traditionally involved in molecular testing of tumors, our experiences with MI‐ONCOSEQ demonstrate that GCs have important applicable skills to contribute to multi‐disciplinary care teams implementing precision oncology. Broader use of WGS in oncology treatment decision making and American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) recommendations for active interrogation of germline tissue in tumor‐normal dyads suggests that GCs will have future opportunities in this area outside of research settings.
dc.publisherSpringer US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otherPrecision oncology
dc.subject.otherWhole genome sequencing
dc.subject.otherGenetic counseling
dc.titleTraditional Roles in a Non‐Traditional Setting: Genetic Counseling in Precision Oncology
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelHuman Genetics
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/147078/1/jgc40655.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10897-014-9698-3
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Genetic Counseling
dc.identifier.citedreferenceO’Neill, S. M., Peters, J. A., Vogel, V. G., Feingold, E., & Rubinstein, W. S. ( 2006 ). Referral to cancer genetic counseling: are there stages of readiness? American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics, 142C ( 4 ), 221 – 231.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSeidenfeld, J., Horstmann, E., Emanuel, E. J., & Grady, C. ( 2008 ). Participants in phase 1 oncology research trials: are they vulnerable? Archives of Internal Medicine, 168 ( 1 ), 16 – 20.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBasic HHS Policy for Protection of Human Research Subjects ( 2009 ). Retrieved from http://www.hhs.sov/ohrp/humansubiects/suidance/45cfr46.html
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBerg, J. S., Adams, M., Nassar, N., Bizon, C., Lee, K., Schmitt, C. P., et al. ( 2013 ). An informatics approach to analyzing the incidentalome. Genetics in Medicine, 15 ( 1 ), 36 – 44.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBombard, Y., Robson, M., & Offit, K. ( 2013 ). Revealing the incidentalome when targeting the tumor genome. JAMA, 310 ( 8 ), 795 – 796.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCatt, S., Langridge, C., Fallowfield, L., Talbot, D. C., & Jenkins, V. ( 2011 ). Reasons given by patients for participating, or not, in Phase 1 cancer trials. European Journal of Cancer, 47 ( 10 ), 1490 – 1497.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDancey, J. E., Bedard, P. L., Onetto, N., & Hudson, T. J. ( 2012 ). The genetic basis for cancer treatment decisions. Cell, 148 ( 3 ), 409 – 420.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDaugherty, C., Ratain, M. J., Grochowski, E., Stocking, C., Kodish, E., Mick, R., et al. ( 1995 ). Perceptions of cancer patients and their physicians involved in phase I trials. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 13 ( 5 ), 1062 – 1072.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGreen, R. C., Berg, J. S., Grody, W. W., Kalia, S. S., Korf, B. R., Martin, C. L., et al. ( 2013 ). ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing. Genetics in Medicine, 15 ( 7 ), 565 – 574.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHalpern, S. D., Ubel, P. A., & Asch, D. A. ( 2007 ). Harnessing the power of default options to improve health care. New England Journal of Medicine, 357 ( 13 ), 1340 – 1344.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJohnston, J. J., Rubinstein, W. S., Facio, F. M., Ng, D., Singh, L. N., Teer, J. K., et al. ( 2012 ). Secondary variants in individuals undergoing exome sequencing: screening of 572 individuals identifies high‐ penetrance mutations in cancer‐susceptibility genes. The American Journal of Human Genetics, 91 ( 1 ), 97 – 108.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMand, C., Gillam, L., Delatycki, M. B., & Duncan, R. E. ( 2012 ). Predictive genetic testing in minors for late‐onset conditions: a chronological and analytical review of the ethical arguments. Journal of Medical Ethics, 38 ( 9 ), 519 – 524.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMazoyer, S., Dunning, A. M., Serova, O., Dearden, J., Puget, N., Healey, C. S., et al. ( 1996 ). A polymorphic stop codon in BRCA2. Nature Genetics, 14 ( 3 ), 253 – 254.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNickel, P. J. ( 2006 ). Vulnerable populations in research: the case of the seriously ill. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 27 ( 3 ), 245 – 264.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePellegrini, I., Rapti, M., Extra, J. M., Petri‐Cal, A., Apostolidis, T., Ferrero, J. M., et al. ( 2012 ). Targeted chemotherapy for breast cancer: patients perception of the use of tumor gene profiling approaches to better adapt treatments. Medical Science (Paris), 28 Spec No 1, 24 – 27.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePoints to consider: ethical, legal, and psychosocial implications of genetic testing in children and adolescents. American Society of Human Genetics Board of Directors, American College of Medical Genetics Board of Directors. ( 1995 ). American Journal of Human Genetics, 57 ( 5 ), 1233 – 1241.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRichman, A. R., Tzeng, J. P., Carey, L. A., Retel, V. P., & Brewer, N. T. ( 2011 ). Knowledge of genomic testing among early‐stage breast cancer patients. Psychooncology, 20 ( 1 ), 28 – 35.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoychowdhury, S., Iyer, M. K., Robinson, D. R., Lonigro, R. J., Wu, Y. M., Cao, X., et al. ( 2011 ). Personalized oncology through integrative high‐throughput sequencing: a pilot study. Science Translational Medicine, 3 ( 111 ), 111ra121.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSharaf, R. N., Myer, P., Stave, C. D., Diamond, L. C., & Ladabaum, U. ( 2013 ). Uptake of genetic testing by relatives of Lynch syndrome probands: a systematic review. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 11 ( 9 ), 1093 – 1100.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTait, A. R., Voepel‐Lewis, T., & Malviya, S. ( 2003 ). Do they understand? (part I): parental consent for children participating in clinical anesthesia and surgery research. Anesthesiology, 98 ( 3 ), 603 – 608.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.