Show simple item record

Improving surgical informed consent in obstetric and gynaecologic surgeries in a teaching hospital in Ethiopia: A before and after study

dc.contributor.authorTeshome, Million
dc.contributor.authorWolde, Zenebe
dc.contributor.authorGedefaw, Abel
dc.contributor.authorAsefa, Anteneh
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-22T19:05:59Z
dc.date.available2019-10-22T19:05:59Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-24
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/151791
dc.description.abstractObjectives Even though surgical informed consent (SIC) has marked benefits, in many settings the information is not provided appropriately. In Ethiopia, minimal attention is given to SIC. This study assesses whether an intervention designed to improve SIC in obstetric and gynaecologic surgeries is associated with receipt of SIC components. Design Pre-intervention and post-intervention surveys were conducted at Hawassa University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital among women who underwent obstetric or gynaecologic surgeries. The intervention consisted of a 3-day training on standard counselling for surgical procedures offered to health professionals. A total of 457 women were surveyed (230 pre-intervention, 227 post-intervention). An adjusted Poisson regression analysis was used to identify the association between the intervention and the number of SIC components received. Results The majority of participants were 25–34 years of age in both the pre-intervention and post-intervention groups (p=0.66). 45.7% of the pre-intervention and 51.5% of the post-intervention survey participants underwent elective surgery (p=0.21). Additionally, 70.4% of pre-intervention survey participants received counselling immediately before surgery, compared with 62.4% of post-intervention participants (p<0.001). 5.7% of pre-intervention and 6.6% of post-intervention participants reported the belief that SIC consists entirely of signing on a piece of paper (p=0.66). After controlling for effects of potential confounders, the number of SIC components reported by post-intervention survey participants was 16% higher than what is received by pre-intervention ones (adjusted coefficient=1.16 (1.06–1.28)). Having elective versus emergency surgery was not associated with the number of components received by participants in either group (adjusted coefficient=0.98 (0.88–1.09)). Conclusion Training on the delivery of standard SIC is associated with receipt of a higher number of standard counselling components. However, there is a need to evaluate whether a one-time intervention leads to sustained improvement. A system-wide study of factors that promote SIC is required.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.titleImproving surgical informed consent in obstetric and gynaecologic surgeries in a teaching hospital in Ethiopia: A before and after studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelObstetrics and Gynecology
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopiaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherSchool of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopiaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherNossal Institute for Global Health, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australiaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/151791/1/Teshome et al-2019-BMJ Open.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023408
dc.identifier.sourceBMJ Openen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5541-0088en_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4470-1848en_US
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of Teshome et al-2019-BMJ Open.pdf : Main article
dc.identifier.name-orcidAsefa, Anteneh; 0000-0003-4470-1848en_US
dc.identifier.name-orcidGedefaw, Abel; 0000-0002-5541-0088en_US
dc.owningcollnameInternational Reproductive Health Training, Center for (UM-CIRHT)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.