View Item 

Show simple item record

Bile duct involvement by hepatocellular carcinoma: A rare occurrence and poor prognostic indicator in bile duct brushing samples

dc.contributor.authorBhattarai, Shristi
dc.contributor.authorGraham, Rondell P.
dc.contributor.authorSigel, Carlie S.
dc.contributor.authorShi, Jiaqi
dc.contributor.authorGonzalez, Raul S.
dc.contributor.authorXue, Yue
dc.contributor.authorKrasinskas, Alyssa M.
dc.contributor.authorHooKim, Kim
dc.contributor.authorAdsay, Volkan
dc.contributor.authorReid, Michelle D.
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-13T15:17:12Z
dc.date.availableWITHHELD_11_MONTHS
dc.date.available2020-01-13T15:17:12Z
dc.date.issued2019-11
dc.identifier.citationBhattarai, Shristi; Graham, Rondell P.; Sigel, Carlie S.; Shi, Jiaqi; Gonzalez, Raul S.; Xue, Yue; Krasinskas, Alyssa M.; HooKim, Kim; Adsay, Volkan; Reid, Michelle D. (2019). "Bile duct involvement by hepatocellular carcinoma: A rare occurrence and poor prognostic indicator in bile duct brushing samples." Cancer Cytopathology (11): 691-699.
dc.identifier.issn1934-662X
dc.identifier.issn1934-6638
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/153086
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.publisherIARC Press
dc.subject.otherbrushing
dc.subject.othercarcinoma
dc.subject.otherhepatocellular
dc.subject.otherbile duct
dc.titleBile duct involvement by hepatocellular carcinoma: A rare occurrence and poor prognostic indicator in bile duct brushing samples
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelOncology and Hematology
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/153086/1/cncy22185_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/153086/2/cncy22185.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/cncy.22185
dc.identifier.sourceCancer Cytopathology
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDusenbery D. Combined hepatocellular‐cholangiocarcinoma. Cytologic findings in four cases. Acta Cytol. 1997; 41: 903 ‐ 909.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRupp M, Hawthorne CM, Ehya H. Brushing cytology in biliary tract obstruction. Acta Cytol. 1990; 34: 221 ‐ 226.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVadmal MS, Byrne‐Semmelmeier S, Smilari TF, Hajdu SI. Biliary tract brush cytology. Acta Cytol. 2000; 44: 533 ‐ 538.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDusenbery D. Biliary stricture due to hepatocellular carcinoma: diagnosis by bile duct brushing cytology. Diagn Cytopathol. 1997; 16: 55 ‐ 56.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchmelzle M, Matthaei H, Lehwald N, et al. Extrahepatic intraductal ectopic hepatocellular carcinoma: bile duct filling defect. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2009; 8: 650 ‐ 652.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFu LY, Mitchell KA, Cai G. Clear cell hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosed by bile duct brushing cytology. Diagn Cytopathol. 2016; 44: 147 ‐ 151.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTorbenson MS, Ng IOL, Park YN, Roncalli M, Sakamato M. Hepatocellular carcinoma. In: WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board, ed. WHO Classification of Tumours: Digestive System Tumours. 5th ed. IARC Press; 2019: 229 ‐ 239.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDas DK. Cytodiagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in fine‐needle aspirates of the liver: its differentiation from reactive hepatocytes and metastatic adenocarcinoma. Diagn Cytopathol. 1999; 21: 370 ‐ 377.
dc.identifier.citedreferencede Boer WB, Segal A, Frost FA, Sterrett GF. Cytodiagnosis of well differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma: can indeterminate diagnoses be reduced? Cancer. 1999; 87: 270 ‐ 277.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMallory TB, Castleman B, Parris BE. Case records of the Massachusetts General Hospital. N Engl J Med. 1947; 237: 673 ‐ 676.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLin TY, Chen KM, Chen YR, Lin WS, Wang TH, Sung JL. Icteric type hepatoma. Med Chir Dig. 1975; 4: 267 ‐ 270.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOkuda K. Clinical aspects of hepatocellular carcinoma: analysis of 134 cases. In: Okuda K, Peters RL, eds. Hepatocellular Carcinoma. John Wiley & Sons; 1976: 387 ‐ 436.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKew MC, Paterson AC. Unusual clinical presentations of hepatocellular carcinoma. Trop Gastroenterol. 1985; 6: 10 ‐ 22.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceQin LX, Tang ZY. Hepatocellular carcinoma with obstructive jaundice: diagnosis, treatment and prognosis. World J Gastroenterol. 2003; 9: 385 ‐ 391.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNarita R, Oto T, Mimura Y, et al. Biliary obstruction caused by intrabiliary transplantation from hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastroenterol. 2002; 37: 55 ‐ 58.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBuckmaster MJ, Schwartz RW, Carnahan GE, Strodel WE. Hepatocellular carcinoma embolus to the common hepatic duct with no detectable primary hepatic tumor. Am Surg. 1994; 60: 699 ‐ 702.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCho HG, Chung JP, Lee KS, et al. Extrahepatic bile duct hepatocellular carcinoma without primary hepatic parenchymal lesions–a case report. Korean J Intern Med. 1996; 11: 169 ‐ 174.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSoyer P, Laissy JP, Bluemke DA, Sibert A, Menu Y. Bile duct involvement in hepatocellular carcinoma: MR demonstration. Abdom Imaging. 1995; 20: 118 ‐ 121.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSaito M, Hige S, Takeda H, Tomaru U, Shibata M, Asaka M. Combined hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma growing into the common bile duct. J Gastroenterol. 2001; 36: 842 ‐ 847.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJan YY, Chen MF. Obstructive jaundice secondary to hepatocellular carcinoma rupture into the common bile duct: choledochoscopic findings. Hepatogastroenterology. 1999; 46: 157 ‐ 161.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKojiro M, Kawabata K, Kawano Y, Shirai F, Takemoto N, Nakashima T. Hepatocellular carcinoma presenting as intrabile duct tumor growth: a clinicopathologic study of 24 cases. Cancer. 1982; 49: 2144 ‐ 2147.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKunz G Jr, Chung J, Ali SZ. Hepatocellular carcinoma–fibrolamellar variant: cytopathology of an unusual case. Diagn Cytopathol. 2002; 26: 257 ‐ 261.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReddy K, Hooper K, Frost A, et al. Intraductal papillary carcinoma of common bile duct diagnosed by endoscopic ultrasound–guided fine‐needle aspiration. Endoscopy. 2014; 46 ( suppl 1 UCTN ): E248 ‐ E249.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReid MD, Stallworth CR, Lewis MM, et al. Cytopathologic diagnosis of oncocytic type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm: criteria and clinical implications of accurate diagnosis. Cancer Cytopathol. 2016; 124: 122 ‐ 134.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJurczyk MF, Zhu B, Villa C, DeFrias D, Lin X. Cytomorphology of intraductal oncocytic papillary neoplasm of the liver. Diagn Cytopathol. 2014; 42: 895 ‐ 898.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBansal A, Thung SN, Zhu H, Schwartz M, Lewis S. Synchronous pancreatic adenocarcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma arising in the context of intraductal papillary neoplasms. Clin Imaging. 2016; 40: 897 ‐ 901.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVolante M, La Rosa S, Castellano I, Finzi G, Capella C, Bussolati G. Clinico‐pathological features of a series of 11 oncocytic endocrine tumours of the pancreas. Virchows Arch. 2006; 448: 545 ‐ 551.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChen S, Wang X, Lin J. Fine needle aspiration of oncocytic variants of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor: a report of three misdiagnosed cases. Acta Cytol. 2014; 58: 131 ‐ 137.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLayfield LJ, Wax TD, Lee JG, Cotton PB. Accuracy and morphologic aspects of pancreatic and biliary duct brushings. Acta Cytol. 1995; 39: 11 ‐ 18.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLogrono R, Kurtycz D, Molina C, Trivedi V, Wong J, Block K. Analysis of false‐negative diagnoses on endoscopic brush cytology of biliary and pancreatic duct strictures. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2000; 124: 387 ‐ 392.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChoi WT, Swanson PE, Grieco VS, Wang D, Westerhoff M. The outcomes of “atypical” and “suspicious” bile duct brushings in the identification of pancreaticobiliary tumors: follow‐up analysis of surgical resection specimens. Diagn Cytopathol. 2015; 43: 885 ‐ 891.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOkonkwo AM, De Frias DV, Gunn R, et al. Reclassification of “atypical” diagnoses in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography–guided biliary brushings. Acta Cytol. 2003; 47: 435 ‐ 442.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVolmar KE, Vollmer RT, Routbort MJ, Creager AJ. Pancreatic and bile duct brushing cytology in 1000 cases: review of findings and comparison of preparation methods. Cancer. 2006; 108: 231 ‐ 238.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHacihasanoglu E, Memis B, Pehlivanoglu B, et al. Factors impacting the performance characteristics of bile duct brushings: a clinico‐cytopathologic analysis of 253 patients. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2018; 142: 863 ‐ 870.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
cncy22185_am.pdf
Size:
299.6KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
cncy22185.pdf
Size:
970.5KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.