Show simple item record

How are Researchers Documenting Their Day-to-Day Activities?

dc.contributor.authorLalwani, Leena
dc.contributor.authorBrandenburg, Marci
dc.contributor.authorMartin, Scott
dc.contributor.authorMacEachern, Mark
dc.contributor.authorRosensweig, Merle
dc.contributor.authorSevryugina, Yulia
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-18T19:44:52Z
dc.date.available2021-11-18T19:44:52Z
dc.date.issued2019-06-16
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/170922en
dc.descriptionPoster design by Jamie Niehof, Engineering Librarianen_US
dc.description.abstractWe undertook a pilot project to evaluate the feasibility of launching a full-scale research project to investigate best practices of researchers at our institution for keeping lab notebooks. Our objectives are to learn about practices already present on campus through a series of faculty interviews, and analyze those practices based on their similarities or differences, their compliance with modern technology, and ease of use and access, as well as to suggest other practices based on our review of tools reported in the literature. We focused on a narrowly defined group of researchers to obtain a more useful set of conclusions upon which to launch a full-scale project. After obtaining IRB exemption(HUM00147763), we emailed a biology department at our institution, our sample population, to explain the project and ask for volunteers. We interviewed six research faculty from that department at our institution about their recordkeeping practices, print vs. electronic notebook use, data and protocol sharing within the lab, and standard policies. Interviews were recorded and transcribed, and the transcripts were coded and analyzed. The results provide a snapshot of current disciplinary practice, which is useful as a benchmark for longitudinal studies of this community as campus-supported electronic tools for research documentation are expected to become more widely available in the coming years. They also suggest points of need where the library might productively offer services within the current paradigm to improve access to and preservation of day-to-day research documentation.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipPartially funded by UM Library: Research and Creative Projects Granten_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.titleHow are Researchers Documenting Their Day-to-Day Activities?en_US
dc.typePosteren_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInformation and Library Science
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciences
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/170922/1/SLA Poster.pdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.7302/3718
dc.identifier.sourceSLA Annual Conference 2019 Cleveland, OH 2019en_US
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of SLA Poster.pdf : Poster.pdf
dc.description.depositorSELFen_US
dc.working.doi10.7302/3718en_US
dc.owningcollnameLibrary (University of Michigan Library)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.