Is the Adjustment of Social Security Benefits Actuarially Fair, and If So, for Whom?
dc.contributor.author | Dushi, Irena | |
dc.contributor.author | Friedberg, Leora | |
dc.contributor.author | Webb, Anthony | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-03-03T14:39:20Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-03-03T14:39:20Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-09 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Dushi, Irena, Leora Friedberg, and Anthony Webb. 2021. “Is the Adjustment of Social Security Benefits Actuarially Fair, and If So, for Whom?” Ann Arbor, MI. University of Michigan Retirement and Disability Research Center (MRDRC) Working Paper; MRDRC WP 2021-421. https://mrdrc.isr.umich.edu/publications/papers/pdf/wp421.pdf | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/171785 | en |
dc.description | working paper | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Average Social Security claim ages among male retired-worker beneficiaries have diverged considerably. The 25th percentile claim age remains just above 62, while the 75th percentile claim has reached 66 for recent retiring cohorts. Life expectancy is lower for those who claim at early ages. For the 1931-32 and later birth cohorts, life expectancy at age 62 for age-62 claimants is around 1-2 years lower than for age-66 claimants. Consequently, late claimants are adversely selected. The impact of selective claiming on actuarial fairness of benefit adjustments has been limited by the low rates of these adjustments for most of the cohorts we study. For the 1931-32 birth cohort, the return to delaying claiming was -0.32% for claimants who actually delayed until age 66, versus -2.63% for claimants who claimed at 62. For later cohorts, the return to delay has become systematically positive for those who actually delay. Yet, the fiscal impact on the Trust Fund of selective claiming remains modest, increasing Trust Fund payouts by 0.3-0.5% for recent retiring cohorts that we study. Many of these patterns are magnified when comparing high and low lifetime earners. Selective claiming occurs within all lifetime earning quartiles, but it increases the return to delay by larger margins for high earners. The return to delay has reached around 5% for those in the highest earning quartile who actually delay claiming among cohorts of recently retiring beneficiaries. Consequently, the impact of selective claiming on inequality in lifetime benefits is greater than on overall benefit payouts, raising lifetime benefit payouts by 1.9% for the highest-earning relative to the lowest-earning quartile among recent retiring cohorts that we study. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | U.S. Social Security Administration, RDR18000002-02, UM20-06 | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | WP 2021-421 | en_US |
dc.subject | differential mortality, Social Security, benefit claiming | en_US |
dc.title | Is the Adjustment of Social Security Benefits Actuarially Fair, and If So, for Whom? | en_US |
dc.type | Working Paper | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Population and Demography | |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Social Sciences | |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Michigan Retirement Research Center | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | U.S. Social Security Administration | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | University of Virginia | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | New School for Social Research | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampus | Ann Arbor | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/171785/1/wp421.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://dx.doi.org/10.7302/4176 | |
dc.description.filedescription | Description of wp421.pdf : working paper | |
dc.description.depositor | SELF | en_US |
dc.working.doi | 10.7302/4176 | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Retirement and Disability Research Center, Michigan (MRDRC) |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.