Show simple item record

Technology-facilitated abuse prevalence and associations among a nationally representative sample of young men

dc.contributor.authorSeewald, Laura
dc.contributor.authorWalsh, Tova
dc.contributor.authorTolman, Richard
dc.contributor.authorLee, Shawna
dc.contributor.authorReed, Lauren
dc.contributor.authorNgo, Quyen
dc.contributor.authorSingh, Vijay
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-31T11:47:32Z
dc.date.available2022-03-31T11:47:32Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationSeewald, L., Walsh, T.B., Tolman, R.M., Lee, S.J., Reed, L.A., Ngo, Q., & Singh, V. (2022). Technology-facilitated abuse prevalence and associations among a nationally representative sample of young men. Annals of Family Medicine, 20(1), 12-17.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/171949en
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE We undertook a study to determine the prevalence and associations of technology-facilitated abuse (TFA)—insults, harassment, coercion, or threats carried out using digital tools such as smartphones and computers—among a US nationally representative sample of young men. METHODS Analyses were based on 1,079 men aged 18 to 35 years who completed questionnaires during August and September of 2014 and reported ever having been in a romantic relationship. We used validated measures to assess demographics, health service use, mental health and substance use, and TFA delivered to and received from partners in the past year. We calculated survey-weighted descriptive statistics and conducted multinomial logistic regression analysis. RESULTS Overall, 4.1% of men reported delivering TFA only, 8.0% receiving TFA only, and 25.6% both delivering and receiving TFA. Men were more likely to report only delivering TFA if they identified as Hispanic (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]=2.72; 95% CI, 1.13 to 6.57), used marijuana (AOR=1.31; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.68), and used prescription opioids for nonmedical reasons (AOR 2.86; 95% CI, 1.48 to 5.54). Men were more likely to report only receiving TFA if they identified as Hispanic (AOR=2.55; 95% CI, 1.01 to 6.43) and used prescription opioids for nonmedical reasons (AOR=2.43; 95% CI, 1.34 to 4.39), whereas a primary care connection appeared protective (AOR=0.43; 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.86). Men were more likely to report both delivering and receiving TFA if they identified as nonHispanic Black (AOR=2.83; 95% CI, 1.44 to 5.58), owned a smartphone (AOR=1.80; 95% CI, 1.05 to 3.09), had ever had mental health care visits (AOR=1.86; 95% CI, 1.16 to 2.98), misused alcohol (AOR=1.10; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.17), and used prescription opioids for nonmedical reasons (AOR=1.79; 95% CI, 1.04 to 3.08). CONCLUSIONS We found that TFA was prevalent among young men, with 1 in 25 reporting delivery only, 1 in 12 reporting receipt only, and 1 in 4 reporting both. Primary care physicians can consider assessing TFA among male patients and developing interventions to mitigate this behavior.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectinterpersonal violenceen_US
dc.subjectdomestic violenceen_US
dc.subjectpartner violenceen_US
dc.subjectfamily violenceen_US
dc.titleTechnology-facilitated abuse prevalence and associations among a nationally representative sample of young menen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelSocial Work
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumMedical School, University of Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/171949/1/2022 seewald annals of family medicine.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1370/afm.2758
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.7302/4250
dc.identifier.sourceAnnals of Family Medicineen_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-0562-2856en_US
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of 2022 seewald annals of family medicine.pdf : main article
dc.description.depositorSELFen_US
dc.identifier.name-orcidLee, Shawna; 0000-0003-0562-2856en_US
dc.working.doi10.7302/4250en_US
dc.owningcollnameSocial Work, School of (SSW)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.