State legislative trends related to biomarker testing
dc.contributor.author | Sadigh, Gelareh | |
dc.contributor.author | Goeckner, Hilary Gee | |
dc.contributor.author | Kazerooni, Ella A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Johnson, Bruce E. | |
dc.contributor.author | Smith, Robert A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Adams, Devon V. | |
dc.contributor.author | Carlos, Ruth C. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-08-02T18:56:15Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-09-02 14:56:14 | en |
dc.date.available | 2022-08-02T18:56:15Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-08-01 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Sadigh, Gelareh; Goeckner, Hilary Gee; Kazerooni, Ella A.; Johnson, Bruce E.; Smith, Robert A.; Adams, Devon V.; Carlos, Ruth C. (2022). "State legislative trends related to biomarker testing." Cancer (15): 2865-2870. | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0008-543X | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1097-0142 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/173083 | |
dc.publisher | American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network and LUNGevity Foundation | |
dc.publisher | Wiley Periodicals, Inc. | |
dc.subject.other | prior authorization | |
dc.subject.other | biomarker testing | |
dc.subject.other | coverage | |
dc.subject.other | insurance | |
dc.subject.other | legislation | |
dc.title | State legislative trends related to biomarker testing | |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.rights.robots | IndexNoFollow | |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Oncology and Hematology | |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Public Health | |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Health Sciences | |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/173083/1/cncr34271.pdf | |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/173083/2/cncr34271_am.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1002/cncr.34271 | |
dc.identifier.source | Cancer | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Sheinson DM, Wong WB, Meyer CS, et al. Trends in use of next-generation sequencing in patients with solid tumors by race and ethnicity after implementation of the Medicare national coverage determination. JAMA Netw Open. 2021; 4: e2138219. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Henderson R, Keeling P, French D, Smart D, Sullivan R, Lawler M. Cost-effectiveness of precision diagnostic testing for precision medicine approaches against non–small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review. Mol Oncol. 2021; 15: 2672 - 2687. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Pennell NA, Mutebi A, Zhou Z-Y, et al. Economic impact of next-generation sequencing versus single-gene testing to detect genomic alterations in metastatic non–small-cell lung cancer using a decision analytic model. JCO Precis Oncol. 2019; 3: 1 - 9. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Chawla A, Peeples M, Li N, Anhorn R, Ryan J, Signorovitch J. Real-world utilization of molecular diagnostic testing and matched drug therapies in the treatment of metastatic cancers. J Med Econ. 2018; 21: 543 - 552. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Kehl KL, Lathan CS, Johnson BE, Schrag D. Race, poverty, and initial implementation of precision medicine for lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019; 111: 431 - 434. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Health equity in biomarker testing and targeted therapy. American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network. Published May 2021. Accessed December 3, 2021. https:// www.fightcancer.org/sites/default/files/FS%20Health%20Equity%20in%20BMT%20and%20Targeted%20Therapy_FINAL.pdf | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Presley C, Soulos P, Chiang A, et al. Disparities in next generation sequencing in a population-based community cohort of patients with advanced non–small cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2017; 35 ( 15 )(suppl): 6563. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Norris RP, Dew R, Sharp L, et al. Are there socio-economic inequalities in utilization of predictive biomarker tests and biological and precision therapies for cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med. 2020; 18: 282. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Improving access to biomarker testing. American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network. Published September 28, 2020. Accessed December 6, 2021. https://www.fightcancer.org/policy-resources/improving-access-biomarker-testing | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Payer Coverage Policies of Tumor Biomarker Testing. American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network and LUNGevity Foundation. Published September 2020. Accessed December 6, 2021. https://www.fightcancer.org/sites/default/files/ACS%20CAN%20and%20LUNGevity_Payer%20Coverage%20Policies%20of%20Tumor%20Biomarker%20Testing.pdf | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Wong WB, Anina D, Lin CW, Adams DV. Alignment of health plan coverage policies for somatic multigene panel testing with clinical guidelines in select solid tumors. Per Med. 2022; 19: 171 - 180. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Ganesh K, Stadler ZK, Cercek A, et al. Immunotherapy in colorectal cancer: rationale, challenges and potential. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019; 16: 361 - 375. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Andre T, Shiu KK, Kim TW, et al. Pembrolizumab in microsatellite-instability-high advanced colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020; 383: 2207 - 2218. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Casak SJ, Marcus L, Fashoyin-Aje L, et al. FDA approval summary: pembrolizumab for the first-line treatment of patients with MSI-H/dMMR advanced unresectable or metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2021; 27: 4680 - 4684. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Next generation sequencing (NGS) (90.2). Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Published January 27, 2020. https://www.cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/details/ncd-details.aspx?NCDId=372 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Genomic sequence analysis panels in the treatment of solid organ neoplasms. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Revised May 1, 2022. Accessed April 12, 2022. https://www.cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/view/lcd.aspx?lcdid=37810&ver=17 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Sheinson DM, Wong WB, Flores C, Ogale S, Gross CP. Association between Medicare’s national coverage determination and utilization of next-generation sequencing. JCO Oncol Pract. 2021; 17: e1774 - e1784. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | State Scorecard: State Medicaid Coverage Policy and Impact on Lung Cancer Outcomes. LUNGevity Foundation. Published March 2020. Accessed December 12, 2021. https://www.lungevity.org/sites/default/files/state-scorecards/LUNGevity-scorecard-030920.pdf | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Flowers ME. Flowers passes landmark legislation making biomarker testing accessible for Illinoisans. Illinois House Democratic Caucus Published September 27, 2021. Accessed December 17, 2021. https://ilhousedems.com/2021/09/27/flowers-passes-landmark-legislation-making-biomarker-testing-accessible-for-illinoisans/ | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Bill status of HB1779. Illinois General Assembly. Accessed December 17, 2021. https://www.ilga.gov/legislation/BillStatus.asp?DocNum=1779&GAID=16&DocTypeID=HB&SessionID=110&GA=102 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Senate Bill No. 84. Louisiana State Legislature. Accessed December 17, 2021. http://www.legis.la.gov/Legis/ViewDocument.aspx?d=1227189 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Senate Bill No. 535. California Legislative Information. Accessed December 17, 2021. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220SB535 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Brown ML, Riley GF, Schussler N, Etzioni R. Estimating health care costs related to cancer treatment from SEER-Medicare data. Med Care 2002; 40 (suppl 8): IV-104-17. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Short PF, Moran JR, Punekar R. Medical expenditures of adult cancer survivors aged <65 years in the United States. Cancer. 2011; 117: 2791 - 2800. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Finkelstein EA, Tangka FK, Trogdon JG, Sabatino SA, Richardson LC. The personal financial burden of cancer for the working-aged population. Am J Manag Care. 2009; 15: 801 - 806. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | The Costs of Cancer. American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network. Published October 2020. Accessed February 8, 2022. https://www.fightcancer.org/sites/default/files/National%20Documents/Costs-of-Cancer-2020-10222020.pdf | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Yabroff KR, Zhao J, Han X, Zheng Z. Prevalence and correlates of medical financial hardship in the USA. J Gen Intern Med. 2019; 34: 1494 - 1502. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Pisu M, Kenzik KM, Oster RA, et al. Economic hardship of minority and non-minority cancer survivors 1 year after diagnosis: another long-term effect of cancer? Cancer. 2015; 121: 1257 - 1264. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Arbour KC, Riely GJ. Systemic therapy for locally advanced and metastatic non–small cell lung cancer: a review. JAMA. 2019; 322: 764 - 774. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Febbo PG, Ladanyi M, Aldape KD, et al. NCCN task force report: evaluating the clinical utility of tumor markers in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2011; 9 ( suppl 5 ): S1 - S32. quiz S33. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Mok T, Camidge DR, Gadgeel SM, et al. Updated overall survival and final progression-free survival data for patients with treatment-naive advanced ALK-positive non–small-cell lung cancer in the ALEX study. Ann Oncol. 2020; 31: 1056 - 1064. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | John A, Yang B, Shah R. Clinical impact of adherence to NCCN guidelines for biomarker testing and first-line treatment in advanced non–small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) using real-world electronic health record data. Adv Ther. 2021; 38: 1552 - 1566. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Gandhi L, Rodriguez-Abreu D, Gadgeel S, et al. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in metastatic non–small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018; 378: 2078 - 2092. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Carbone DP, Reck M, Paz-Ares L, et al. First-line nivolumab in stage IV or recurrent non–small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017; 376: 2415 - 2426. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Survey findings summary: understanding provider utilization of cancer biomarker testing across cancers. American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network. Published December 2021. Accessed December 12, 2021. https:// www.fightcancer.org/sites/default/files/national_documents/provider_utilization_of_biomarker_testing_polling_memo_dec_2021.pdf | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Mack PC, Klein MI, Ayers KL, Zhou X, Guin S, Fink M, Rossi M, Ai-Kateb H, O’Connell T, Hantash FM, Oh WK, Newman S, Schadt EE, Chen R, Hirsch FR Targeted next-generation sequencing reveals exceptionally high rates of molecular driver mutations in never-smokers with lung adenocarcinoma. Oncologist. 2022; oyac035. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Lee SH, Lee B, Shim JH, et al. Landscape of actionable genetic alterations profiled from 1,071 tumor samples in Korean cancer patients. Cancer Res Treat. 2019; 51: 211 - 222. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Fox AH, Jett JR, Roy UB, et al. Knowledge and practice patterns among pulmonologists for molecular biomarker testing in advanced non–small cell lung cancer. Chest. 2021; 160: 2293 - 2303. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Mehta A, Vasudevan S, Sharma SK, et al. Biomarker testing for advanced lung cancer by next-generation sequencing; a valid method to achieve a comprehensive glimpse at mutational landscape. Appl Cancer Res. 2020; 40: 4. doi: 10.1186/s41241-020-00089-8 | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Freedman AN, Klabunde CN, Wiant K, et al. Use of next-generation sequencing tests to guide cancer treatment: results from a nationally representative survey of oncologists in the United States. JCO Precis Oncol. 2018; 2: 1 - 13. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Mileham KF, Schenkel C, Bruinooge SS, et al. Defining comprehensive biomarker-related testing and treatment practices for advanced non–small-cell lung cancer: results of a survey of U.S. oncologists. Cancer Med. 2022; 11: 530 - 538. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Dieguez G, Carioto J. The landscape of biomarker testing coverage in the United States. Milliman, Inc. Published February 15, 2022. Accessed April 8, 2022. https://www.milliman.com/en/insight/the-landscape-of-biomarker-testing-coverage-in-the-US | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Desai K, Hooker G, Gilbert K, Cropper C, Metcalf R, Kachroo S. Real-world trends in costs of next generation sequencing (NGS) testing in U.S. setting. J Clin Oncol. 2021; 39: e18824. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Dalal AA, Guerin A, Mutebi A, Culver KW. Economic analysis of BRAF gene mutation testing in real world practice using claims data: costs of single gene versus panel tests in patients with lung cancer. J Med Econ. 2018; 21: 649 - 655. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Pisu M, Azuero A, Meneses K, Burkhardt J, McNees P. Out of pocket cost comparison between Caucasian and minority breast cancer survivors in the Breast Cancer Education Intervention (BCEI). Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011; 127: 521 - 529. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Messner DA, Al Naber J, Koay P, et al. Barriers to clinical adoption of next generation sequencing: perspectives of a policy Delphi panel. Appl Transl Genom. 2016; 10: 19 - 24. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Lu CY, Loomer S, Ceccarelli R, et al. Insurance coverage policies for pharmacogenomic and multi-gene testing for cancer. J Pers Med. 2018; 8: 10. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Trosman JR, Douglas MP, Liang SY, et al. Insights from a temporal assessment of increases in US private payer coverage of tumor sequencing from 2015 to 2019. Value Health. 2020; 23: 551 - 558. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Survivor views: biomarker testing. American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network. Published September 28, 2020. Accessed April 7, 2022. https:// www.fightcancer.org/sites/default/files/Survivor%20Views%20Biomarker%20Testing%20Polling%20Memo.pdf | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Seo MK, Cairns J. Do cancer biomarkers make targeted therapies cost-effective? A systematic review in metastatic colorectal cancer. PLoS One. 2018; 13: e0204496. | |
dc.working.doi | NO | en |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.