Show simple item record

Implementing immediate postpartum contraception: a comparative case study at 11 hospitals

dc.contributor.authorMoniz, Michelle H.
dc.contributor.authorBonawitz, Kirsten
dc.contributor.authorWetmore, Marisa K.
dc.contributor.authorDalton, Vanessa K.
dc.contributor.authorDamschroder, Laura J.
dc.contributor.authorForman, Jane H.
dc.contributor.authorPeahl, Alex F.
dc.contributor.authorHeisler, Michele
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-10T18:56:25Z
dc.date.available2022-08-10T18:56:25Z
dc.date.issued2021-04-12
dc.identifier.citationImplementation Science Communications. 2021 Apr 12;2(1):42
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-021-00136-7
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/174081en
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background Immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) is an evidence-based practice, but hospitals face significant barriers to its adoption. Our objective was to examine how organizational context (e.g., size, employee attitudes toward the clinical practice) and implementation strategies (i.e., the actions taken to routinize a clinical practice) drive successful implementation of immediate postpartum LARC services, with a goal of informing the design of future implementation interventions. Methods We conducted a comparative case study of the implementation of inpatient postpartum contraceptive care at 11 US maternity hospitals. In 2017–2018, we conducted site visits that included semi-structured key informant interviews informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Qualitative measures of implementation success included stakeholder satisfaction, routinization, and sustainability of immediate postpartum LARC services. Qualitative content analysis and cross-case synthesis explored relationships among organizational context, implementation strategies, and implementation success. Results We completed semi-structured interviews with 78 clinicians, nurses, residents, pharmacy and revenue cycle staff, and hospital administrators. Successful implementation required three essential conditions: effective implementation champions, an enabling financial environment, and hospital administrator engagement. Six other contextual conditions were influential: trust and effective communication, alignment with stakeholders’ professional values, perception of meeting patients’ needs, robust learning climate, compatibility with workflow, and positive attitudes and adequate knowledge about the clinical practice. On average, sites used 18 (range 11-22) strategies. Strategies to optimize the financial environment and train clinicians and staff were commonly used. Strategies to plan and evaluate implementation and to engage patients emerged as promising to address barriers to practice change, yet were often underused. Conclusions Implementation efforts in maternity settings may be more successful if they select strategies to optimize local conditions for success. Our findings elucidate key contextual conditions to target and provide a menu of promising implementation strategies for incorporating recommended contraceptive services into routine maternity practice. Additional prospective research should evaluate whether these strategies effectively optimize local conditions for successful implementation in a variety of settings.
dc.titleImplementing immediate postpartum contraception: a comparative case study at 11 hospitals
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/174081/1/43058_2021_Article_136.pdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.7302/5812
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s)
dc.date.updated2022-08-10T18:56:24Z
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.