Show simple item record

Gender-Affirming Surgeons’ Attitudes toward Social Media Communication with Patients

dc.contributor.authorMadzia, Jules L.
dc.contributor.authorChuanromanee, Tee
dc.contributor.authorBlasdel, Gaines
dc.contributor.authorDeGuia, Aloe
dc.contributor.authorByrnes, Mary
dc.contributor.authorShakir, Nabeel A.
dc.contributor.authorLane, Megan
dc.contributor.authorHaimson, Oliver L.
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-07T15:42:15Z
dc.date.available2024-03-07T15:42:15Z
dc.date.issued2023-12-15
dc.identifier.citationBulletin of Applied Transgender Studies, Vol. 2, No. 3–4: 151–174en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/192620en
dc.description.abstractOnline spaces are increasingly important for transgender people who are considering gender-affirming surgeries to find information, ask questions, and communicate with each other. While many surgical resources are community-generated, the onus of providing medical information about surgery should be on the surgical team. We sought to understand the potential for an online space for surgeon and community engagement. We assessed gender-affirming surgeon perspectives on online communication and communities by conducting a survey (N = 55) to understand current social media use and gauge surgeons’ opinions related to participating in online spaces. We found that gender-affirming surgeons were not generally in support of a new online platform for patient-surgeon communication, with 67% responding that a new platform was not needed. Participants identified potential negative implications including risks to patients (e.g., misinformation, liability, and platform use in emergency situations) and risks to surgeons (e.g., the additional burden that the platform would place on their already-limited time, changes to surgeon culture, and safety concerns related to online harassment). Potential positive implications include opportunities to improve patient education and enhance patient care. Our results establish empirical understanding of social media use patterns among gender-affirming surgeons and may inform the design of resources to enable trans patients to receive the information and care that they require when considering and undergoing gender-affirming surgery.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversity of Michigan’s Institute for Research on Women and Gender (IRWG) Faculty Seed Granten_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherCenter for Applied Transgender Studies and Northwestern University Librariesen_US
dc.subjecttransgender healthen_US
dc.subjectgender-affirming surgeryen_US
dc.subjectdoctor-patient communicationen_US
dc.subjecthealth communicationen_US
dc.subjectsocial mediaen_US
dc.titleGender-Affirming Surgeons’ Attitudes toward Social Media Communication with Patientsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInformation Science
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumInformation, School ofen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumMichigan Medicineen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Surgeryen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUniversity of Cincinnatien_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherHenry Ford Healthen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/192620/1/Madzia_Gender Affirming Surgeons.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.57814/e1tc-mt51
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.7302/22436
dc.identifier.sourceBulletin of Applied Transgender Studiesen_US
dc.description.mapping-1en_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-6552-4540en_US
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of Madzia_Gender Affirming Surgeons.pdf : Main article
dc.description.depositorSELFen_US
dc.identifier.name-orcidHaimson, Oliver; 0000-0001-6552-4540en_US
dc.working.doi10.7302/22436en_US
dc.owningcollnameInformation, School of (SI)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.