Show simple item record

We and they: Pronouns as measures of political identification and estrangement

dc.contributor.authorCramer, M. Richarden_US
dc.contributor.authorSchuman, Howarden_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-07T16:35:41Z
dc.date.available2006-04-07T16:35:41Z
dc.date.issued1975-09en_US
dc.identifier.citationCramer, M. Richard, Schuman, Howard (1975/09)."We and they: Pronouns as measures of political identification and estrangement." Social Science Research 4(3): 231-240. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/21996>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6WX8-4D5W37Y-V/2/0415a75c35f89298ad9816c6a5847c86en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/21996
dc.description.abstractSome people refer to the United States government as "we," some people as "they," in responses to an open-ended survey question on American intervention in Vietnam. This seemingly trivial linguistic difference (and perhaps others) can be included as part of a regular coding operation. In the present instance, race seems to be the most important determinant of pronoun usage, with blacks more likely to refer to the United States as "they" rather than "we." The pattern of other associations to pronoun referent also differs by race: white they-sayers tend to be low in education and in personal trust of other people generally, while black they-sayers are not distinctive in education, but give evidence of solidarity with blacks and of alienation from whites. Not all the results fit together neatly, and limitations of the present measure are noted, but the findings suggest the value of content analysis of linguistic style in verbatim responses to survey questions.en_US
dc.format.extent602890 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.titleWe and they: Pronouns as measures of political identification and estrangementen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelSocial Sciences (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USAen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/21996/1/0000408.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0049-089X(75)90013-7en_US
dc.identifier.sourceSocial Science Researchen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.