Show simple item record

Inhibition in penicillin-induced epileptic foci

dc.contributor.authorAnderson, T. E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRutledge, Lester T.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-07T17:35:13Z
dc.date.available2006-04-07T17:35:13Z
dc.date.issued1979-05en_US
dc.identifier.citationAnderson, T. E., Rutledge, L. T. (1979/05)."Inhibition in penicillin-induced epileptic foci." Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 46(5): 498-509. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/23577>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6SYX-482XHNB-17Y/2/ed1edc9d2b5d061439b6f349627a106cen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/23577
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=88338&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractA previous study indicated that the early surface negative component (associated with recurrent inhibition) of the evoked potential recorded from cat pericruciate cortex, subsequent to pyramidal tract stimulation, was altered after application of penicillin to the cortical surface (Van Duijn et al. 1973). This suggested that decreased effectivess of recurrent inhibition might be the basis for epileptogenicity of penicillin.To verify that recurrent inhibition is functionally decreased in the penicillin epileptic focus and to assess alternative sites for penicillin action, this phenomenon was investigated at the cellular level. Neurons were recorded extracellularly and response to stimuli monitored throughout the transition from normal cortex to epileptogenic cortex. Stimuli employed were peduncular stimulation (to test recurrent inhibitory pathways), epicortical stimulation (to test inhibitory pathways, bypassing the recurrent collateral system), and forepaw footpad shock (to test the responsiveness of neurons to afferent input).In normal cortex, PT cells were inhibited by peduncular or epicortical stimulation and excited by forepaw stimulation, with the excitation followed by a period of inhibition. In the penicillin focus, inhibition was not observed in response to any of the 3 stimuli, and the excitatory response to forepaw stimulation was maintained.The bursting non-PT cells, most likely candidates for interneurons, exhibited excitation in response to peduncular and epicortical stimulation, consistent with involvement in inhibitory pathways. Nonetheless, in the penicillin focus, excitatory response to peduncular and epicortical stimulation was maintained. Excitatory response to forepaw stimulation was also maintained in the penicillin focus.The results demonstrate a loss of effectiveness of recurrent inhibition measured at the PT cell body in the penicillin focus. Further, the reduction in inhibitory feedback occurs in conjuction with maintained or enhanced excitability of the neurons which are most likely candidates for inhibitory interneurons. Thus, penicillin is most likely exerting its effect at the inhibitory synapses onto PT cells in the cortex, thereby allowing excitatory input to have greater influence on neuronal firing.en_US
dc.format.extent826575 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.titleInhibition in penicillin-induced epileptic focien_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychiatryen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumNeuroscience Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich. 48109, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumNeuroscience Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich. 48109, U.S.A.en_US
dc.identifier.pmid88338en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/23577/1/0000538.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(79)90003-8en_US
dc.identifier.sourceElectroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiologyen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.