Cognitive reference points in judgments of symbolic magnitude
dc.contributor.author | Holyoak, Keith J. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Mah, Wesley A. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2006-04-07T17:50:44Z | |
dc.date.available | 2006-04-07T17:50:44Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1982-07 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Holyoak, Keith J., Mah, Wesley A. (1982/07)."Cognitive reference points in judgments of symbolic magnitude." Cognitive Psychology 14(3): 328-352. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/23941> | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6WCR-4D5XC30-2Y/2/6b97f79cb8a1d3e4ec899db733232c24 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/23941 | |
dc.description.abstract | Research on speeded symbolic magnitude comparisons indicates that decisions are made more quickly when the magnitudes of the stimuli being compared are relatively close to an explicit or implicit reference point. Alternative explanations of this phenomenon are tested by seeking similar effects in nonspeeded rating tasks. In accord with the predictions of discriminability models, rated magnitude differences between stimuli in the vicinity of a reference point are expanded relative to differences between stimuli far from it. The inferred locations of cities along a west-east axis varies systematically depending on which coast, Pacific or Atlantic, is specified as the reference point. Scales derived from the rating data are correlated with the pattern of reaction times obtained in a comparable speeded comparison task. In addition, the distance between the cities nearest the locale of our subjects is subjectively stretched. Reference point effects are also observed when the form of the comparative specifies an implicit reference point at either end of a continuum of subjective size; however, these effects are very small and do not clearly support a discriminability interpretation. Stronger evidence for discriminability effects is obtained when an explicit reference point is established at an arbitrary size value. An implicit scaling model, related to range-frequency theory, is proposed to account for the influence of reference points on relative discriminability of stimulus magnitudes. The implicit scaling model is used to develop an account of how symbolic magnitudes may be learned and of how habitual reference points can produce asymmetries in distance judgments. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 1782882 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 3118 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_US |
dc.title | Cognitive reference points in judgments of symbolic magnitude | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.rights.robots | IndexNoFollow | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Psychology | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Social Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | University of Michigan, USA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | University of Michigan, USA | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/23941/1/0000188.pdf | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(82)90013-5 | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | Cognitive Psychology | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.