Show simple item record

Radiotherapeutic alternatives to standard management of adenocarcinoma of the endometrium

dc.contributor.authorAndersen, Willie A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPeters, III, William A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorFechner, Robert E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMorley, George W.en_US
dc.contributor.authorThornton, Jr. , W. Normanen_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-04-07T18:36:24Z
dc.date.available2006-04-07T18:36:24Z
dc.date.issued1983-12en_US
dc.identifier.citationAndersen, Willie A., Peters, III, William A., Fechner, Robert E., Morley, George W., Thornton, Jr., W. Norman (1983/12)."Radiotherapeutic alternatives to standard management of adenocarcinoma of the endometrium." Gynecologic Oncology 16(3): 383-392. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/25049>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6WG6-4C52KXF-FG/2/a85a5352b5a76d3d58c82714b7512c66en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/25049
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=6418622&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractPrimary radiotherapy as an alternative management for adenocarcinoma of the endometrium was chosen for 117 patients treated at the University of Michigan Medical Center and University of Virginia Medical Center. Cases were selected for radiation because of contraindications to surgery (52.2%) or by protocol for disease outside the endometrium (47.8%). An overall 5-year actuarial survival rate of 49.6% was attained for all stages, with 55% 5-year survival for disease limited to the uterus or cervix. Stage and grade were the most significant risk factors. The addition of external-beam irradiation did not improve local failure rates or survival. Heyman's uterine packing technique was slightly more successful than uterine "line sources" in controlling local disease (P = 0.08). Treatment-related mortality (0.8%) and morbidity (6.8%) were minimal. Surgery, whenever possible, remains the "best standard therapy" but the radiotherapeutic alternative is of significant benefit for those deemed nonsurgical candidates.en_US
dc.format.extent733980 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.titleRadiotherapeutic alternatives to standard management of adenocarcinoma of the endometriumen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelOtolaryngologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelOphthalmologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelOncology and Hematologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelObstetrics and Gynecologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNeurosciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInternal Medicine and Specialtiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology University of Virginia Medical Center, P. O. Box 465, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Pathology, University of Virginia Medical Center, P. O. Box 465, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology University of Virginia Medical Center, P. O. Box 465, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908, USAen_US
dc.identifier.pmid6418622en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/25049/1/0000477.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0090-8258(83)90166-Xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceGynecologic Oncologyen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.